319 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
研究概要・中間発表予稿の「研究としての筋」を、論理の鎖(L1背景→L2関連研究と限界→L3課題(差分)→L4仮説→L5評価→L6位置づけ)として1リンクずつ採点し、さらに端点間の整合(掲げた構成概念=旗と評価指標=物差しのズレ=construct validity)を照合するスキル。各文の綺麗さ(→articulation-check)でも汎用の弱点(→weakness-analyze)でもなく「リンク間が繋がっているか／旗と物差しが一致しているか」を見る。骨子・位置づけ・仮説・課題設定・研究の一貫性を見てほしい、research framing を見て、と言われたとき。旧名 research-framing-check。
Use when a problem or issue needs explicit framing before deeper analysis begins — establishing the Problem statement, Current state, Desired state, Stakeholders, and Success criteria. This should trigger when an issue's Problem Framing point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to frame a problem before root-cause analysis, design, or planning begins. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a raw idea into ONE honest recommendation: interview one question at a time until the problem, requirements, goals, non-goals, and constraints are CONFIRMED, then deliver a single verdict — do, don't, cheaper alternatives, trade-offs, ordered checklist, success metrics. Required: the user wants exactly ONE recommendation — not options, not a debate — and their framing is open to challenge (advise may answer a different question than the one asked). Triggers on "what should I do about X", "advise me on X", "am I approaching this right", "is this the right move". Do NOT use to be interrogated with no recommendation (→ mk:grill) — advise also interviews one question at a time, but only to reach a verdict. Do NOT use when the framing is settled and only the options are open (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to decide whether something is worth building (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when you want several perspectives to argue it out (→ mk:party).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Change what something MEANS before you change what it IS — Rory Sutherland's cheapest lever. Use when a product, price, feature, or message is objectively fine but feels cheap, generic, boring, overpriced, or unjustified; when the user says 'how do we make this feel more premium/valuable/exciting', 'people don't get why it's worth it', 'how do we reposition/rename/repackage this', or wants to raise perceived value without changing the product or cutting the price. Covers renaming, recategorising, mental accounting (price framing), creating artificial value, and context-shifting. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic. 日本語の相談（「高いと言われる」「安っぽく見える」「値下げせずに高級感を出したい」）にも使う。中文咨询（“被说太贵”“显得廉价”“不降价也想显得高级”）也适用。
機械学習のない既存アプリに、推薦・分類・予測などを追加するための手順を整理します。課題とデータの確認から、最初のモデルの学習・評価・組み込みまでを支援します。
When the user wants to apply psychological principles, mental models, or behavioral science to marketing. Also use when the user mentions 'psychology,' 'mental models,' 'cognitive bias,' 'persuasion,' 'behavioral science,' 'why people buy,' 'decision-making,' 'consumer behavior,' 'anchoring,' 'social proof,' 'scarcity,' 'loss aversion,' 'framing,' or 'nudge.' Use this whenever someone wants to understand or leverage how people think and make decisions in a marketing context. For applying psychology to specific pages, see cro; for pricing tactics, see pricing; for copy framing, see copywriting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for custom binary or text protocol recovery, handshake reconstruction, framing, sequence control, checksums, stateful replay, and accepted-session reproduction. Use when the user asks to decode an unknown protocol, recover custom framing, build a replay harness, satisfy sequence or checksum rules, replay a captured session, or prove the smallest message order that reaches an accepted branch. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide teams through MITRE's Problem Framing Canvas. Use when you need a clearer problem statement before jumping to solutions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clarifies a vague clinical or biomedical research idea into a structured, bounded, searchable, researchable, and testable question. Always use this skill whenever a user has an early-stage clinical or research thought, an over-broad topic, an ill-defined evidence question, or an unclear problem statement that must be translated into a question framing suitable for literature retrieval, evidence synthesis, gap analysis, study design, or downstream protocol planning. Never jump straight to answering the substantive medical question unless the user explicitly asks for that. Focus first on question framing, boundary setting, and downstream-ready formulation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Experiment design reference for problem-class framing, Minimum Viable Experiment coaching, hypothesis formation, vetting and red flags, and experiment readiness. Use when translating a stated business outcome into candidate data-science problem classes, or when framing, vetting, scoping, or evaluating an experiment of any kind, including data feasibility, architecture, LLM, performance, use-case, UX, prototyping, and hardware experiments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a framing document from conversation transcripts. Use when the user has transcripts (VTT, call notes, etc.) and wants to produce a frame that captures the problem worth solving and why it was chosen over alternatives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when framing the system and describing the model for an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript — defining system boundaries, components, hierarchical levels, and feedbacks, then choosing, describing, and calibrating the model (process/simulation, whole-farm, bio-economic, agent-based, or integrated assessment). This is the distinctive core of an AgSy paper. Structures the model and system; it does not run code for you.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The Jobs-to-be-Done framework as applied product methodology. Job statements, struggling moments, hire and fire criteria, the difference between feature-thinking and job-thinking. Honest about where JTBD adds clarity (discovery, prioritization, positioning) and where it becomes performative ritual (job-statement workshops that do not drive decisions, persona-theater disguised as JTBD). Triggers on jobs-to-be-done, JTBD, job statements, struggling moments, hire criteria, fire criteria, switch triggers, functional emotional social jobs, outcome-driven innovation. Also triggers when a team is over-relying on feature-request lists or persona archetypes that do not drive product decisions, when a positioning conversation needs the framing JTBD provides, or when discovery is producing outputs that do not connect to product strategy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to apply psychological principles, mental models, or behavioral science to marketing. Also use when the user mentions 'psychology,' 'mental models,' 'cognitive bias,' 'persuasion,' 'behavioral science,' 'why people buy,' 'decision-making,' 'consumer behavior,' 'anchoring,' 'social proof,' 'scarcity,' 'loss aversion,' 'framing,' or 'nudge.' Use this whenever someone wants to understand or leverage how people think and make decisions in a marketing context. For applying psychology to specific pages, see cro; for pricing tactics, see pricing; for copy framing, see copywriting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to generate a cinematic still image on Higgsfield, asks about shot framing, camera angle, or composition for image prompts, needs a specific shot type (close-up, wide shot, cowboy shot, etc.), or is working with [img] reference-based image generation. Covers distance & size shots, camera angles, and camera movement keywords optimized for AI image models (Soul 2.0, Nano Banana, Seedream, GPT Image, Flux, etc.).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shapes agent behavior via instruction framing and style transfer. Use when composing dispatch prompts or writing skill instructions for parallel review agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create text-based wireframes at low, mid, and high fidelity with component inventories, interaction annotations, and responsive breakpoint specifications. Use when the user requests wireframing or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform validated pain points into articulated user value statements for PRD v0.1 Spark. Triggers on completing problem framing, defining user outcomes, articulating value propositions, or requests like "what value do users get", "define outcomes", "articulate the benefit", "finish v0.1", "pain to value", "what do they gain". Outputs CFD- entries tagged as value hypotheses with evidence tiers. Follows Problem Framing skill in workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
产品营销 (PMM, Product Marketing) — 拥有「产品如何被定位 / 表达 / 发布 / 卖进市场」的从业者认知操作系统: 是产品 / 销售 / 市场 / 客户之间的连接组织, 负责把产品能力翻译成市场价值, 并把市场声音带回产品。覆盖 (a) 定位与差异化 (April Dunford 「刻意选择语境」框架 + 竞争性替代方案 + 卖价值不卖功能 + 选择「让你优势成立的市场参照系」, 对照 Ries & Trout 经典「定位是占领心智」), (b) 信息传递与叙事 (messaging 层级 / 信息屋 + 价值主张 + 收益导向 vs 战略叙事「换框架」Andy Raskin + 表达清晰度 Emma Stratton / Punchy + 初创 homepage 定位 FletchPMM), (c) 进入市场 (GTM) 策略与产品发布 (发布分级 T1/T2/T3 + 发布流程与跨职能编排 + GTM 打法 PLG vs SLG vs 混合 + 滩头细分选择), (d) 市场与竞争情报 (竞品分析 + battlecard 战卡 + 输赢分析 win/loss + 竞争赋能 Klue/Crayon/Clozd), (e) 买家与客户研究 (ICP 理想客户画像 + 买家 / 用户 persona + Jobs-to-be-Done 任务理论 Christensen/Moesta/Ulwick ODI + 客户之声 VoC + 用真实买家测信息 Wynter/Peep Laja), (f) 销售赋能 (战卡 + pitch / 销售 deck + 一页纸 + demo 叙事 + 异议处理 + 销售培训 + 内容采用率 — 你的产出只值销售实际用到的那部分), (g) 定价与打包 (价值定价 + 打包分层 + 《Monetizing Innovation》Ramanujam/Simon-Kucher + PLG 定价 — 常与产品 / 财务共担), (h) 细分与品类 (市场细分 + TAM/SAM/SOM + 技术采用生命周期与跨越鸿沟 Geoffrey Moore + 品类设计与叙事 Play Bigger / Christopher Lochhead — 稀有且昂贵, 不是默认选项), (i) 需求生成与内容协同 (campaign 信息 + 思想领导力 + 漏斗内容 TOFU/MOFU/BOFU + ABM 基于客户营销), (j) 分析师与影响者关系 (Gartner 魔力象限 + Forrester Wave + 分析师 briefing — To B 场景, 对 pay-to-play 影响诚实标注), (k) 客户营销与倡导 (参考客户 + case study + 评测站 G2/TrustRadius/Capterra 运营 + 社区), (l) PMM 运营与度量 (影响管道 + 赢率 + 发布采用率 + 信息穿透率 + 角色汇报线「向产品还是向市场」之争 + PMM 作为战略职能 vs 接单工具人陷阱); 跨 B2B SaaS (该学科重心) / B2C 消费 / 开发者 PLG / 平台产品。不含 产品管理 (PM 造产品 / 拥有 roadmap, PMM 拥有市场 — 相邻且极易混淆) / 增长 / 效果营销 / 付费投放 (平行学科) / 品牌 / 企业传播 / 公关为终点 / 需求生成为终点 (PMM 与之协同但不等同) / 平面设计 /「做 slide 和周边的团队」(PMM 抗争的接单工具人窄化) / 泛泛「市场营销」。 (Product Marketing (PMM) — the cognitive operating system of practitioners who own how a product is positioned, messaged, launched, and sold into a market: the connective tissue between product, sales, marketing, and customers, responsible for translating product capability into market value and bringing the voice of the market back into product. Covers (a) positioning & differentiation (April Dunford's deliberate-context framing, competitive alternatives, value-not-features, framing the market in which your strengths matter — vs Ries & Trout classic perception-in-the-mind positioning), (b) messaging & narrative (messaging hierarchy / house, value proposition, benefit-led vs strategic-narrative / change-the-frame messaging Andy Raskin, clarity craft Emma Stratton/Punchy, homepage & startup positioning FletchPMM), (c) go-to-market (GTM) strategy & product launches (launch tiers T1/T2/T3, launch process & cross-functional orchestration, GTM motion PLG vs SLG vs hybrid, beachhead segment selection), (d) market & competitive intelligence (competitive analysis, battlecards, win/loss analysis, competitive enablement Klue/Crayon/Clozd), (e) buyer & customer research (ICP ideal customer profile, buyer & user personas, Jobs-to-be-Done Christensen/Moesta/Ulwick ODI, voice of customer, message testing with real buyers Wynter/Peep Laja), (f) sales enablement (battlecards, pitch & sales decks, one-pagers, demo narratives, objection handling, sales training, content adoption — output is only as good as what sales actually uses), (g) pricing & packaging (value-based pricing, packaging & tiering, Monetizing Innovation Ramanujam/Simon-Kucher, PLG pricing — often shared with product/finance), (h) segmentation & category (market segmentation, TAM/SAM/SOM, technology adoption lifecycle & crossing the chasm Geoffrey Moore, category design & narrative Play Bigger / Christopher Lochhead — rare and expensive, not a default), (i) demand-gen & content partnership (campaign messaging, thought leadership, funnel content TOFU/MOFU/BOFU, ABM account-based marketing), (j) analyst & influencer relations (Gartner Magic Quadrant, Forrester Wave, analyst briefings — for B2B, with honest read on pay-to-play perception), (k) customer marketing & advocacy (references, case studies, reviews G2/TrustRadius/Capterra presence, community), (l) PMM operations & metrics (influenced pipeline, win rate, launch adoption, message pull-through, the role's reporting line product-vs-mark
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design audience-specific framing, drafts, and communication sequence for stakeholder updates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to apply psychological principles, mental models, or behavioral science to marketing. Also use when the user mentions 'psychology,' 'mental models,' 'cognitive bias,' 'persuasion,' 'behavioral science,' 'why people buy,' 'decision-making,' 'consumer behavior,' 'anchoring,' 'social proof,' 'scarcity,' 'loss aversion,' 'framing,' or 'nudge.' Use this whenever someone wants to understand or leverage how people think and make decisions in a marketing context. For applying psychology to specific pages, see cro; for pricing tactics, see pricing; for copy framing, see copywriting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comparative framing across contemplative and mind-body traditions — Sōtō Zen and Rinzai Zen, Theravada vipassana, Tibetan Vajrayana, classical yoga and its eight limbs, Daoist internal cultivation, secular MBSR and MBCT, engaged mindfulness as Thich Nhat Hanh teaches it, Christian contemplative prayer, Sufi dhikr, the Hesychast tradition of the Eastern Orthodox church — for the routing agent who has to understand where a user is already standing before recommending a practice. Covers the pedagogical voice of each tradition, the places they overlap, the places they genuinely disagree, and the non-sectarian framing the college department uses. Use when a user arrives with a prior tradition, when a query spans more than one tradition, or when the agent needs a vocabulary for what is shared and what is lineage-specific.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when reviewing, designing, or improving a workshop, lesson, training session, facilitation plan, talk, or educational explanation. Use it when the user provides a topic, concept, or explanation and wants better framing questions, curiosity hooks, opening prompts, discussion questions, learner reflection prompts, or ways to make participants think before being taught.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a theory into falsifiable, pre-registerable hypotheses, covering the DGP and DAG, identification, SATE versus PATE, counterfactual and directional framing, named estimands, justified SESOIs, the choice among NHST, equivalence, interval, and minimum-effect tests, scope conditions, and primary, secondary, and exploratory tiers. Use when the user asks to turn a research question or theory into hypotheses, whether a prediction is falsifiable, what the estimand is, or how to predict a null. Framing goes to narrative-building, the plan to pre-registration-writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。