「gap」の検索結果

Implement, configure, and secure Sign In With Google (SiwG) using Google Identity Services (GIS / `https://accounts.google.com/gsi/client`) across web architectures. Use when creating Google sign-in buttons, implementing Google One Tap with FedCM, integrating GIS in React/Next.js/Angular/HTML, verifying ID tokens on backend runtimes (Python/Node.js/Go/Java), enforcing Google Workspace domain restrictions (`hd`), securing client-side ID tokens via WebCrypto nonces or encrypted IndexedDB, embedding in cross-origin iframes via the Intermediate Iframe API (`https://accounts.google.com/gsi/intermediate`), configuring Content Security Policy (CSP), COOP, and Permissions Policy (`identity-credentials-get`) headers, or handling sign-out and revocation. Don't use for legacy Google Sign-In (`gapi.auth2`), Google Cloud IAM service accounts, or Android/iOS native Credential Manager.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author, validate, test, and deploy YARA-L 2.0 detection rules and evaluate end-to-end detection coverage gaps in Google SecOps. Use when writing new detection rules, tuning existing rules, validating syntax, testing logic against historical telemetry, or evaluating detection coverage against threat intelligence blogs, CVE disclosures, and Threat Detection Opportunities (TDOs) using synthetic UDM events and long-running coverage analysis. Don't use for alert triage (use secops-triage), deep forensic event reconstruction on infected hosts (use secops-investigate), or case management operations (use secops-cases).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automates the end-to-end detection engineering workflow in Google SecOps using MCP tools. Use when fetching threat intelligence from blogs, generating Threat Detection Opportunities (TDOs), simulating attacker behavior with synthetic UDM events, evaluating rule coverage, and deploying gap-closing rules. Don't use for standalone YARA-L 2.0 rule authoring/tuning (use secops-detection-engineering), threat hunting, or SOC investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evolutionary explanation-discovery engine for hard-to-vary causal theories of unknown phenomena. USE WHEN develop a new theory, explain a mystery, solve an explanatory gap, discover a mechanism, consciousness, origin, or scientific breakthrough. Also use for multi-cycle creative exploration. NOT FOR a single-pass divergent brainstorm (use BeCreative) or delivery validation alone (use Evals).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-grounded context refresh: reads constitutional files, TELOS, and CURRENT_STATE/IDEAL_STATE dimension files via TelosFreshness, pulls observed data (Oura sleep/HRV, Conduit app-time, work registry, git, expenses via StateEvidence), and drives a peer conversation that opens with claim-vs-evidence contradictions, drafts corrections for ratification, and closes with a ComputeGap-grounded ideal-state review. Routes to ContextCheckin; Phase0Setup on fresh install. USE WHEN /interview, resume interview, context check-in, telos check-in, what's stale, stale data, freshness check, update current state, update my current state, state sync, statusline says interview due, interview due, review TELOS, update ideal state, quarterly context refresh, fresh LifeOS install, configure DA name. NOT FOR single edits (Telos), bulk intake (Migrate), identity-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover WHICH new skills you should create, from your own work history plus your satisfaction/frustration signals. Read-only and proposal-only: it surfaces recurring pain that no existing skill, loop, or workflow covers, then hands you a ranked shortlist to build with CreateSkill. It never creates or edits a skill itself. Frustration is a first-class signal (a topic can look 'covered' while you keep hitting the same wall inside it), so it reads low ratings and recurrence markers, not just session topics. USE WHEN should I create a skill, what skills do I need, suggest skills, skill gap, based on my recent work, am I missing a skill, what should I build. NOT FOR creating/validating/testing/optimizing an individual skill (use CreateSkill) — this only decides WHAT to build, not how.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze ecommerce SEO across product pages, product schema, Shopping visibility, marketplace signals, and keyword gaps. Use only for stores, catalogs, or product listings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a site's backlink profile, anchors, toxic signals, competitors, gaps, and disavow candidates. Use only when links or referring domains are the requested focus.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes your recent Codex chat history to identify coding patterns, development gaps, and areas for improvement, curates relevant learning resources from HackerNews, and automatically sends a personalized growth report to your Slack DMs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates test files, creates mocking strategies, analyzes code coverage, designs test architectures, and produces test plans and defect reports across functional, performance, and security testing disciplines. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests; creating test strategies or automation frameworks; analyzing coverage gaps; performance testing with k6 or Artillery; security testing with OWASP methods; debugging flaky tests; or working on QA, regression, test automation, quality gates, shift-left testing, or test maintenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Concrete patterns for breaking colony work into parallel worker jobs via run_playbook — when fan-out helps, how to model the goal as a tracker table, write the worker skill, author the playbook, pilot, and let convergence retry/resume the gap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check the full candidate diff, affected consumers, focused tests, evidence identities, and verification gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a codebase or directory for security issues (hardcoded secrets, injection, unsafe deserialization, weak crypto, authz gaps) and produce a structured findings report. Use when the user asks for a security review, an audit, or to check code for vulnerabilities. Report only — never fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retroactively audit and fill Nyquist validation gaps for a completed phase

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research competitor paid-ad presence, messaging, creative, formats, landing pages, keyword and auction signals, transparent ad libraries, and strategic gaps across supported platforms. Use for competitor ads, ad libraries, ad spy, competitive PPC analysis, competitor creative, Google Ads Transparency, Meta Ad Library, or paid-media competitor research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research roadmap for a legal issue — statutes to check, case law areas to investigate, regulatory frameworks, Westlaw search terms. Leads and frameworks, NOT authoritative citations; students verify and develop everything. Use when a student asks where to start researching, wants a research roadmap for an issue, or needs gaps identified in existing research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided customization of your regulatory practice profile — change one thing without re-running the whole cold-start interview. Adjust watched regulators, policy library index, materiality threshold, gap response process, feed configuration, or matter workspace paths. Use when the user says "change my [thing]", "add a regulator", "update my watchlist", "edit my threshold", or "customize".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or review an element chart — a patent claim chart (infringement, invalidity, or review) or a civil element chart for any cause of action or defense — with every cell pin-cited and gap detection as the priority output. Use when the user asks for a claim chart, element chart, proof chart, infringement or invalidity contention, element-by-element mapping, or asks "what are we missing to prove [claim]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft an employment policy with state supplements where law differs across the jurisdictional footprint. Use when the user says "draft a [topic] policy", "we need a policy on", "update our [topic] policy", or names a policy gap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

IRAC-scaffolded case analysis memo with research gaps flagged — the scaffold, not the analysis. Rule blocks are RESEARCH NEEDED, Application is STUDENT ANALYSIS prompts, Conclusion is blank. Use when a student needs to scaffold a case analysis memo, write up their analysis, or build an IRAC memo for a case.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track the IP portfolio — registrations, renewals, maintenance fees, and use declarations. Use when checking what's renewing, adding or updating an asset, recording a maintenance filing, or auditing the register for gaps, lapses, and use-in-commerce questions. Receives handoffs from prosecution and clearance work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify a proposed worker engagement — employee, IC, temp, or vendor — by running the applicable jurisdiction tests and flagging misclassification gaps between the intended arrangement and what the facts actually support. Prospective use only. Use when someone says "we want to bring on a contractor", "is this a vendor or a temp", "how should we classify this person", or describes a proposed working arrangement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference: implementation-planning framework for international hiring — EOR vs. entity decision framing, cross-functional triggers for tax/finance/HR, structured outside-counsel briefing requests, and a persistent gap tracker. Loaded by /expansion-kickoff and /expansion-update; not invoked directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ask questions against an open investigation log — what witnesses said, where accounts conflict, what gaps exist, what the strongest evidence is on each issue. Use when the attorney needs to query the investigation record without re-reading every entry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。