「gather」の検索結果

Use when coaching hypothesis-driven debugging that requires the learner to gather evidence and reason about root causes before applying fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep, iterative internet research for current facts, source triangulation, contradiction checks, due diligence, competitive analysis, claim verification, "latest" lookups, and cited reports. Use when the user asks to browse, search, research the web, verify claims, compare sources, gather primary sources, investigate companies, people, products, technical topics, news, events, markets, or create AKBP-ready durable research evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic ambiguity resolution through tiered information gathering. Use when facing unclear requirements, unknown context, uncertain implementation choices, or any situation where guessing would be risky.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an expert requirements gatherer and agent builder. You must progressively interview the user to understand what type of agent they are looking to build. You should ask one question at a time w

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Ansible — ansible automation and configuration management. Covers playbook execution, inventory management, role management, vault secrets, ad-hoc commands, fact gathering, and task debugging. Use when running playbooks, managing inventories, debugging task failures, or auditing Ansible configurations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture the findings as a Markdown file in the repo. Use when the user wants a topic researched, docs or API facts gathered, or reading legwork delegated to a background agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Best practices for gathering requirements using AskUserQuestion before taking action

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-time setup that gathers design context for your project and saves it to your AI config file. Run once to establish persistent design guidelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automates SOC 2 Type II audit preparation including gap assessment against AICPA Trust Services Criteria (CC1-CC9), evidence collection from cloud providers and identity systems, control testing validation, remediation tracking, and continuous compliance monitoring. Covers all five TSC categories (Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy) with automated evidence gathering from AWS, Azure, GCP, Okta, GitHub, and Jira. Use when preparing for or maintaining SOC 2 Ty...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides open source intelligence techniques for CTF challenges. Use when gathering information from public sources, social media, geolocation, DNS records, username enumeration, reverse image search, Google dorking, Wayback Machine, Tor relays, FEC filings, or identifying unknow

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture the findings as a Markdown file in the repo. Use when the user wants a topic researched, docs or API facts gathered, or reading legwork delegated to a background agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform) is an open-source threat intelligence platform for gathering, sharing, storing, and correlating Indicators of Compromise (IOCs) of targeted attacks, threat

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Traces ransomware cryptocurrency payment flows using blockchain analysis tools such as Chainalysis Reactor, WalletExplorer, and blockchain.com APIs. Identifies wallet clusters, tracks fund movement through mixers and exchanges, and supports law enforcement attribution. Activates for requests involving ransomware payment tracing, bitcoin wallet analysis, cryptocurrency forensics, or blockchain intelligence gathering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares meeting materials by gathering context from Notion, enriching with Claude research, and creating both an internal pre-read and external agenda saved to Notion. Helps you arrive prepared with comprehensive background and structured meeting docs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigates a session recording by gathering metadata, person profile, same-session events, and linked error tracking issues in one pass. Use when a user provides a recording or session ID and wants to understand what happened — who the user was, what they did, what errors occurred, and whether there are related error tracking issues. Replaces the manual chain of session-recording-get, persons-retrieve, execute-sql, and query-error-tracking-issues-list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authors bioinformatics pipelines in WDL (Workflow Description Language) run by Cromwell or miniwdl, targeting the GATK/Broad and Terra/AnVIL/BioData Catalyst cloud ecosystem, with tasks, workflows, scatter-gather parallelism, structs, and a runtime block that sizes the cloud VM. Use when deciding to target Terra/AnVIL/GATK/WARP (chosen for the ecosystem, not the language); sizing runtime disks dynamically for a fresh-per-task cloud VM (ceil(size(f)*factor)+buffer); choosing preemptible vs on-demand VMs by task length and idempotency; picking Cromwell (production, cloud, call-caching) vs miniwdl (local dev, miniwdl check linting, readable errors); enabling and debugging call-caching silent-miss modes; pinning Docker by digest for reproducibility and cache stability; or scattering an array for parallel fan-out.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical research methodology with YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles. Phases: scope definition, information gathering, analysis, synthesis, recommendation. Capabilities: technology evaluation, architecture analysis, best practices research, trade-off assessment, solution design. Actions: research, analyze, evaluate, compare, recommend technical solutions. Keywords: research, technology evaluation, best practices, architecture analysis, trade-offs, scalability, security, maintainability, YAGNI, KISS, DRY, technical analysis, solution design, competitive analysis, feasibility study. Use when: researching technologies, evaluating architectures, analyzing best practices, comparing solutions, assessing technical trade-offs, planning scalable/secure systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lay out how a job search will actually run alongside a current job: the hours available each week and what they go to, how weekday daytime slots for interviews will be found, which routes to use (direct applications, job boards, scout sites, agents, referrals, public employment services) and what each one discloses to whom, how to keep the search from reaching the current employer through public profiles or workplace equipment, a single tracker of every application's stage, next action, and deadline, and a date and conditions for reviewing, reducing, or pausing the search. Use when someone has decided to start looking, or to gather information while employed, and asks how to fit it in, which routes to use, whether the applications they are running fit the time they have, or how to keep track of them; do not use to decide whether to change jobs, to pick or rate employers or job postings, to predict outcomes, or to send applications, publish profiles, or contact agents on the user's behalf.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a specific company before applying or interviewing by gathering facts from primary and official sources, recording the source and date behind every claim, and keeping anonymous or unverifiable material clearly separated from confirmed fact. Use when a user asks what a company actually does, how it makes money, what its published conditions are, whether a posting matches the company's own disclosures, or what to verify before an interview; do not use to predict hiring outcomes, to repeat review-site content as fact, or to bulk-crawl sites that prohibit automated access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-time setup that gathers design context for your project and saves it to your AI config file. Run once to establish persistent design guidelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Memory consolidation pass: orient on existing memories, gather signal from logs/transcripts, merge updates into topic files, prune index. Use on 'dream', 'consolidate memory', 'clean up memories', 'prune memories', 'memory maintenance', or when memories feel stale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research topics thoroughly and write comprehensive, well-structured content including articles, documentation, blog posts, and technical writing with proper citations and sources. Use when writing blog posts, creating technical articles, researching topics, gathering sources, writing documentation, creating educational content, or producing research-backed content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build personas," "customer personas," "jobs to be done," "JTBD," "what do customers say," "what are customers struggling with," "Reddit mining," "G2 reviews," "review mining," "digital watering holes," "community research," "forum research," "competitor reviews," "customer sentiment," or "find out why customers churn/convert/buy." Use for both analyzing existing research assets AND gathering new research from online sources. For writing copy informed by research, see copywriting. For acting on research to improve pages, see page-cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage AEM Workflow issues on AEM as a Cloud Service by classifying symptoms, gathering the right logs and metrics, and mapping to runbooks or Splunk searches. Use when the user asks for workflow activity/errors on a Cloud Service host, needs to classify a Jira ticket, or wants to know what to collect for workflow debugging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。