1,174 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Transform an output-focused roadmap into an outcome-focused one that communicates strategic intent. Rewrites initiatives as outcome statements reflecting user and business impacts. Use when shifting to outcome roadmaps, making a roadmap more strategic, or rewriting feature lists as outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A GDD changed — scan ADRs and the traceability index for now-stale architectural decisions. Impact report, guides resolution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and design control flows and data structures. Produces compact ASCII tree diagrams showing triggers, call chains, payload shapes, state mutations, and re-render effects. Use when user asks to diagram, trace, visualize, or design a flow or data structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous rule adherence checker. Scans the codebase for rule violations, fixes the highest-impact ones in an isolated worktree, runs full validation, creates a PR. Uses memory to track progress across runs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Commit, push, branch, and manage version control with GitButler. Use for commits, selective dirty-file or hunk commits, branches, diffs, PRs, history edits, squashes, amends, undo, merge, apply, and unapply. For selected dirty files or hunks, inspect with `but diff`; use compact `but status` for commit order, branch/stack placement, or conflict overview; use `but status -fv` when file/hunk IDs or per-commit file details matter. Replaces git write commands.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to build and post the weekly ENG/PRODUCT shipping brief to Slack — a compact summary of what shipped, a ranked merged-PR count per person with week-on-week delta and shipping streaks, and an async standup thread prompt. Load this when you are the `leaderboard` agent (the `weekly-leaderboard` cron), or when someone asks for a weekly contributor/shipping summary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hourly error-backlog grooming sweep for {{sentry_project}}. Groups new and spiking errors, dedupes against existing GitHub issues in {{triage_repo}} by Sentry issue ID, drafts a GitHub issue with the stack trace and impact for the top {{max_issues_per_run}}, and posts a sweep summary to {{alert_channel}}. Never resolves, ignores, mutes, or assigns an error.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PUA Shot — compact all-in-one PUA reference for explicit injection into sub-agents or short sessions. Strong flavor, same evidence-first behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PUA Pro extensions: self-evolution notes, compaction state continuity, KPI-style summaries, flavor switching, and feedback tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drives cmux as an agent cockpit to boot, race, and monitor visible agent teams. Mac-only. USE WHEN cmux, agent cockpit, boot an agent team, orchestrate agents, three-tier orchestration, agent race, needle-in-haystack hotfix, agent fleet, 2x2 fleet, watch/monitor my agents, scale compute to scale impact, send a prompt to a running agent, multiplexer, terminal cockpit, orchestrator lead worker. NOT FOR one-shot in-harness subagents with no terminal to watch (use Agent/Workflow), the Pulse dashboard itself (cmux feeds it, use Pulse), browser deploy-verification (use Interceptor), or Linux/Windows (cmux is Mac-only — use tmux).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Defensive threat modeling and risk management for your own estate — map where sensitive data lives across your asset graph, run compromise scenarios (what a hacked asset exposes, its blast radius, how you'd respond), and maintain a persistent risk register with likelihood×impact scoring, owners, mitigations, and review cadence via a deterministic CLI. All real data stays in your private USER tree; this skill is code only. USE WHEN threat model, threat modeling, risk register, risk assessment, what if X got hacked, compromise scenario, blast radius, sensitive data map, where is our sensitive data, data classification, risk review, add a risk, accept a risk, security risk posture. NOT FOR active pentesting or exploitation (use an offensive-security skill), world-scale futures stress-testing of ideas (use WorldThreatModel), or executing incident response (use your incident-response runbooks — this skill plans them).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when a model gets read-write control over its own live context window instead of a harness-scheduled compaction policy: the context exposed as an editable file the model rewrites with code tools, model-driven eviction and in-place updates, the harness invariants that keep self-editing safe (pinned prefix, edit gate, edit receipts, budget readouts, rollback on overflow), the prefix-cache cost of mid-context edits, and steering or training the model's own context-editing strategy. Route note content and fixed-threshold summarization to context-compression, cache-stable layout under harness control to context-optimization, file offloading to filesystem-context, and loop governance to self-improvement-loops.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when writing, enhancing, or evaluating the launch prompt for a long-running autonomous agent or a parallel multi-agent orchestration attacking a hard problem: pseudo-formal task briefs that define terms and an exact success predicate linguistically, enumerate non-counting outcomes, set persistence rules with explicit stop and return conditions and effort floors, manage a diverse portfolio of parallel approaches with an approach registry and blocked-route bookkeeping, and gate the return on adversarial audit. Route agent topology and coordination protocols to multi-agent-patterns, runtime control surfaces and loop governance to harness-engineering, evaluator and quality-gate construction to evaluation, judge design to advanced-evaluation, and compaction or memory mechanics to context-compression and memory-systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when long-running agent sessions need context compression, structured summarization, compaction, token-per-task optimization, or durable handoff summaries that preserve decisions, files, risks, and next actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ambient Memori long-term memory for Claude Code via local Bash. MUST TRIGGER on essentially every non-trivial user turn: run recall before drafting any substantive response, whether or not the user mentioned memory, a prior session, or past work. The default is to check memory first; do not wait to be asked. Always fire before external lookups (WebSearch/WebFetch) and before answering any question about preferences, prior decisions, constraints, project history, status, past work, or any non-trivial coding/research task. Skip only for trivial acknowledgements/closings, purely self-contained turns where prior context cannot possibly help, or when the user explicitly opts out. Use Advanced Augmentation after drafting the final response for every non-trivial turn, as the last memory step. Use recall.summary only for broad session summaries/orientation, compaction after context loss, feedback for memory quality, quota for limits, and signup only when explicitly requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides researchers through structured ideation frameworks to discover high-impact research directions. Use when exploring new problem spaces, pivoting between projects, or seeking novel angles on existing work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess an immutable patch artifact's program impact, regression risk, and auto-merge eligibility. Use for generated patch files, provider pull-request diffs, or commit ranges when reviewers need evidence about affected runtime paths, contracts, tests, and recoverability. This skill is read-only and does not generate, edit, apply, push, or merge the patch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check the full candidate diff, affected consumers, focused tests, evidence identities, and verification gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guided customization of your AI governance practice profile — change one thing without re-running the whole cold-start interview. Adjust risk posture, escalation contacts, use-case registry entries, vendor AI positions, AI policy commitments, impact-assessment house style, or matter workspace paths. Use when the user says "change my [thing]", "update my profile", "edit my config", "tune my playbook", or "customize".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diff a proposed handbook change against the current version, flag ripple effects and state supplement impacts. Use when user says "update the handbook", "add this to the handbook", "handbook change", or has a policy ready for insertion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the cold-start interview — learns your AI governance practice and writes `~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/ai-governance-legal/CLAUDE.md` from your AI policy, a reference impact assessment, and key vendor AI agreements. Use when the practice profile is missing or contains `[PLACEHOLDER]` markers, or when user says "set up ai governance plugin", "onboard me", "configure ai governance".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Ontoly's deterministic Software Graph and MCP capabilities for architecture review, request tracing, dependency analysis, configuration lookup, and impact analysis before falling back to source-file search.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs a Semgrep security scan over a codebase: detects languages, selects rulesets, presents the plan for explicit approval, then runs every approved ruleset through scripts/run-scans.sh, which batches the semgrep processes and writes scans.json, and merges the output to SARIF. Supports two scan modes, "run all" for full ruleset coverage and "important only" for security findings at medium-to-high confidence and impact. Uses Semgrep Pro for cross-file taint analysis when it is available. Use when asked to scan code for vulnerabilities, run a security audit with Semgrep, find bugs, or perform static analysis. For the same scan without the approval gate, use the /static-analysis:semgrep-scan workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Penetration test and red team report writing methodology. Covers executive summary structuring (risk-led narrative for non-technical readers), technical finding format (title, severity, affected scope, narrative, reproduction steps, impact, remediation, references), CVSS v3.1 / v4.0 scoring with vector justification, OWASP risk rating, evidence hygiene (redacting credentials, hashing client data, time-stamping every action), screenshot and PoC artifact management, finding chain narratives, scope/limitations/assumptions documentation, retest evidence and remediation tracking, deliverable formats (PDF, DOCX, HTML, JSON for SIEM ingestion), client-customer-deliverable separation, and common report mistakes (over-CVSSing, undermining the triager, missing the 'so what'). Use at the end of an engagement when authoring a deliverable, when restructuring a draft for executive readability, or when establishing a reusable report template for a consulting practice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。