393 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Load this skill whenever the project contains navigation components — primary navigation menus, dropdown menus, mega menus, breadcrumbs, pagination, mobile hamburger menus, or in-page jump navigation. Under no circumstances create navigation without proper landmark roles, keyboard support, and accessible labels. Absolutely always wrap navigation in <nav> with a unique aria-label.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load this skill whenever the project contains SVG graphics — inline SVGs, external SVG files, SVG icons, SVG illustrations, or SVG-based data visualizations. Under no circumstances use SVG without proper accessible titles, descriptions, and ARIA roles where required. Absolutely always add <title> and <desc> to meaningful SVGs and set role="img" with aria-labelledby pointing to those elements. Also apply this skill whenever the project accepts untrusted or user-uploaded SVG content, which requires sanitization before rendering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Move issues and external PRs through a state machine of triage roles — categorise, verify, grill if needed, and write agent-ready briefs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run evidence-disciplined Xiaohongshu social listening for foreign pharma employee pain points. Use when the user asks to collect and analyze notes/comments about pharma companies, aliases, roles, compliance, medical affairs, or AI topics, then produce a cited and scored sampled-insight report. Includes independent-evidence counting, MediaCrawler batch collection, and CAPTCHA/461 fallback to Agent Reach/OpenCLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decision transparency, feedback collection, and debate invitations for AID methodology. Active in ALL phases for ALL roles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when work needs Scrum roles, ceremonies, backlog refinement, sprint planning, story delivery, release readiness, or role handoffs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sets up Convex auth, identity mapping, and access control. Use for login, auth providers, users tables, protected functions, or roles in a Convex app.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sets up Convex auth, identity mapping, and access control. Use for login, auth providers, users tables, protected functions, or roles in a Convex app.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inter-agent communication protocol for C-suite agent teams. Defines invocation syntax, loop prevention, isolation rules, and response formats. Use when C-suite agents need to query each other, coordinate cross-functional analysis, or run board meetings with multiple agent roles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search 8,400+ AI and ML jobs across 489 companies, inspect listings and employers, match roles, and view salary and market stats via AI Dev Jobs MCP
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy cloud-native deception across AWS, Azure, and GCP using decoy (honey) resources whose only purpose is to generate a high-fidelity alert the instant an attacker touches them: canary IAM access keys, permission-less decoy users/roles/service principals, honey object-storage buckets, and decoy secrets in Secrets Manager / Key Vault / Secret Manager. Wires detection through CloudTrail + EventBridge, Azure Sentinel honeytoken watchlists + Defender, and GCP Cloud Audit Logs, so any use of a decoy is routed to the SOC with near-zero false positives. Use when protecting cloud accounts and data stores, when an org has only on-prem honeypots and needs cloud coverage, when seeding fake AWS keys to catch credential theft and code-leak exposure, or when detecting cloud reconnaissance and lateral movement. Keywords: cloud deception, canary token AWS, honey S3 bucket, decoy IAM credentials, CloudTrail alert, GuardDuty, Sentinel honeytoken, decoy secret, honey service account, cloud honeypot, breach detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find over-permissive RBAC roles and service-account token abuse paths in Kubernetes using kubectl auth can-i, rbac-police, kubectl-who-can, and rakkess during authorized cluster security reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auditing Kubernetes cluster RBAC configurations to identify overly permissive roles, wildcard permissions, dangerous ClusterRoleBindings, service account abuse, and privilege escalation paths using kubectl, rbac-tool, KubiScan, and Kubeaudit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply bottom-up and top-down role mining techniques to discover optimal RBAC roles from existing user-permission assignments, reducing role explosion and enforcing least privilege.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinate Codex work across the current task, internal subagents, user-owned tasks, worktrees, handoffs, formal review gates, or recurring automation. Use for delegation, parallel roles, another Codex task, cross-repo work, QA/review handoffs, scheduled follow-up, or task inspection and continuation. Chinese triggers include 子Agent/子进程/子对话, 另一个对话接手, 并行处理, 分给QA, 多仓库收口, 巡检, 持续推进, 定时自动继续, 创建/读取/转交任务.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route protection with beforeLoad, redirect()/throw redirect(), isRedirect helper, authenticated layout routes (_authenticated), non-redirect auth (inline login), RBAC with roles and permissions, auth provider integration (Auth0, Clerk, Supabase), router context for auth state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 (NIST AI 100-1). Use for AI risk management, trustworthiness characteristics, GOVERN/MAP/MEASURE/MANAGE functions, bias management, AI actor roles, TEVV, AI RMF profiles, and socio-technical risk framing. Does not cover sector-specific regulations, EU AI Act, ISO 42001 in depth, or the AI RMF Playbook tactical detail.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NASA System Safety Handbook Volume 2 (NASA/SP-2014-612). Use for risk-informed safety cases (RISC), integrated safety analysis (ISA), adequate safety concepts, safety objectives and requirements, acquirer/provider roles, graded safety analysis, claims-evidence-argument structure, SSMP development, and RISC evaluation. Does not cover nuclear or chemical safety domains, occupational health regulations, or NASA-specific programmatic requirements beyond system safety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 3 (Incident Response Recommendations for Cybersecurity Risk Management). Use for CSF 2.0-aligned incident response life cycles, IR roles, Community Profile priorities for DE/RS/RC and preparation, playbooks, coordination, and continuous improvement. Covers 800-61r3 only; does not replace CSF 2.0 full text, SP 800-61r2 tactical playbooks, or sector-specific breach-notification law.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NASA NPR 7123.1D — Systems Engineering Processes and Requirements. Use for the 17 common SE processes (SE Engine), life-cycle reviews and entrance/success criteria, SEMP structure and content, ETA roles and tailoring/customizing rules, Technology Readiness Levels (TRL 1–9), SE work product maturity terminology, contracted project oversight, and MOE/MOP/TPM measurement frameworks. Does not cover NASA programme financial management, human spaceflight medical standards, or software engineering requirements in depth (see NPR 7150.2 for the latter).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the DoD Risk, Issue, and Opportunity (RIO) Management Guide for Defense Acquisition Programs (OUSD R&E, Sep 2023 incl. Change 2.2). Use for the defense-acquisition mechanics of program risk management: the RIO definitions (risk/issue/opportunity), the five-step risk process (plan-identify-analyze-mitigate-monitor), 1-5 likelihood/consequence scoring and the 5x5 risk matrix, the four mitigation options (accept/avoid/transfer/control), burn-down plans, issue management (probability=1), opportunity management toward should-cost, cross-program/interface risk, tailoring RIO to the six AAF acquisition pathways (UCA/MTA/MCA/Software/DBS/Services), specialized methods (RMF, MBCRA/Cyber Table Top, Agile metrics, FMECA, ITRA/DTRAM), and institutionalizing RIO via the PRMP, boards (RMB/JRMB/ROMB/RWG), tools, tiered roles, and WBS/IMP/IMS/EVM/TPM integration. This is the DoD-acquisition complement to nasa-risk (general CRM/RIDM theory) and dau-se-guidebook (the SE process frame). Does NOT teach general risk theory from scratch, and defers specialized risk regimes (system safety/ESOH, HSI, detailed cyber/RMF, spectrum) to their own DoD instructions and the relevant packs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the DoD Test & Evaluation Enterprise Guidebook (August 2022 edition 8.02) with DOT&E-facing enterprise emphasis. Use for T&E enterprise roles (DOT&E vs USD(R&E)), DT&E/OT&E/LFT&E, cybersecurity T&E, MOSA/automation/digital enablers, suitability/reliability growth, and TEMP/Strategy/STE planning. Distinct routing from dod-te-guidebook (same guidebook family, pathway-deep pack). Guidance only—defer to DoDI 5000.89 and Title 10 for binding requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the DoD Test & Evaluation Enterprise Guidebook (OUSD R&E, August 2022). Use for DoD test and evaluation (T&E) across the Adaptive Acquisition Framework — the four test communities (contractor testing, developmental DT&E, operational OT&E, live-fire LFT&E); the five operational events (Operational Demonstration, EOA, OA, IOT&E, FOT&E) and the OTRR gate; the T&E Strategy / TEMP and its IDSK, with the upstream documents that feed it and the test plans that decompose it; the T&E organizations and oversight roles (USD(R&E), DOT&E, TRMC, the Service Executives and OTAs, the T&E WIPT, CDT); and pathway-specific T&E for all six acquisition pathways (Urgent Capability, Middle Tier, Major Capability, Software, Defense Business Systems). Statutory anchors include 10 U.S.C. §4171 (IOT&E) and §4172 (LFT&E/FUSL). This is guidance, not policy: it points outward to DoDI 5000.89 and the DoDI 5000-series for binding detail, and is thin on detailed test statistics/design-of-experiments methodology, cost estimating, the Acquisition of Services pathway, and any CUI/CAC-gated companion guides.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from DAFMAN 63-119 (15 April 2021), Mission-Oriented Test Readiness Certification. Use for continuous MOTRC replacing single-point OTRR thinking: framework/applicability, Certification Official vs PM roles, review cycle and exit criteria, certification memo/decertify gates, DT&E/contractor evidence, ITT integration and cyber resiliency, and the 31-template matrix. DAF T&E readiness process only—does not replace DoDI 5000.89, AFI 99-103, or multi-service lead policies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。