「uat」の検索結果

Fix MSBuild targets that generate files during the build but those files are missing from compilation or output. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: generated source files not compiling (CS0246 for a type that should exist), custom build tasks that create files but they are invisible to subsequent targets, globs not capturing build-generated files because they expand at evaluation time before execution creates them, ensuring generated files are cleaned by the Clean target. Covers correct BeforeTargets timing (CoreCompile, BeforeBuild, AssignTargetPaths), adding to Compile/FileWrites item groups, using $(IntermediateOutputPath) instead of hardcoded obj/ paths. DO NOT USE FOR: C# source generators that already work via the Roslyn pipeline, T4 design-time generation that runs in Visual Studio, non-MSBuild build systems. INVOKES: no tools — pure knowledge skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for organizing MSBuild infrastructure with Directory.Build.props, Directory.Build.targets, Directory.Packages.props, and Directory.Build.rsp. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: structuring multi-project repos, centralizing build settings, implementing NuGet Central Package Management (CPM) with ManagePackageVersionsCentrally, consolidating duplicated properties across .csproj files, setting up multi-level Directory.Build hierarchy with GetPathOfFileAbove, understanding evaluation order (Directory.Build.props → SDK .props → .csproj → SDK .targets → Directory.Build.targets). Critical pitfall: $(TargetFramework) conditions in .props silently fail for single-targeting projects — must use .targets. DO NOT USE FOR: non-MSBuild build systems, migrating legacy projects to SDK-style (use msbuild-modernization), single-project solutions with no shared settings. INVOKES: no tools — pure knowledge skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for optimizing MSBuild build parallelism and multi-project scheduling. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: builds not utilizing all CPU cores, speeding up multi-project solutions, evaluating graph build mode (/graph), build time not improving with -m flag, understanding project dependency topology. Note: /maxcpucount default is 1 (sequential) — always use -m for parallel builds. Covers /maxcpucount, graph build for better scheduling and isolation, BuildInParallel on MSBuild task, reducing unnecessary ProjectReferences, solution filters (.slnf) for building subsets. DO NOT USE FOR: single-project builds, incremental build issues (use incremental-build), compilation slowness within a project (use build-perf-diagnostics), non-MSBuild build systems. INVOKES: binlog MCP server tools (expensive_projects, expensive_targets, project_target_times); falls back to dotnet build -m, dotnet build /graph, binlog replay + grep.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for optimizing MSBuild incremental builds. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: builds slower than expected on subsequent runs, 'nothing changed but it rebuilds anyway', diagnosing why targets re-execute unnecessarily, fixing broken no-op builds. Covers 8 common causes: missing Inputs/Outputs on custom targets, volatile properties in output paths (timestamps/GUIDs), file writes outside tracked Outputs, missing FileWrites registration, glob changes, Visual Studio Fast Up-to-Date Check (FUTDC) issues. Key diagnostic: look for 'Building target completely' vs 'Skipping target' in binlog. DO NOT USE FOR: first-time build slowness (use build-perf-baseline), parallelism issues (use build-parallelism), evaluation-phase slowness (use eval-performance), non-MSBuild build systems. INVOKES: binlog MCP server tools (overview, search, target details); falls back to dotnet build /bl, binlog replay with diagnostic verbosity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure AI Projects SDK for Java. High-level SDK for Azure AI Foundry project management including connections, datasets, indexes, and evaluations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

High-level SDK for Azure AI Foundry projects with agents, connections, deployments, and evaluations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure AI Projects SDK for .NET. High-level client for Azure AI Foundry projects including agents, connections, datasets, deployments, evaluations, and indexes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Best practices for scikit-learn machine learning, model development, evaluation, and deployment in Python

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Supervised & unsupervised learning, scikit-learn, XGBoost, model evaluation, feature engineering for production ML

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Machine learning in Python with scikit-learn. Use for classification, regression, clustering, model evaluation, and ML pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs numerical and symbolic mathematics using NumPy, SciPy, SymPy, and mpmath. Use when the user needs linear algebra, arrays, optimization, integration, ODEs, symbolic expressions, equation solving, or arbitrary-precision arithmetic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffolds eval.yaml test files for agent skills in the dotnet/skills repository. Use when creating skill tests, writing evaluation scenarios, defining assertions and rubrics, or setting up test fixture files. Handles eval.yaml generation, fixture organization, and overfitting avoidance. Do not use for running or debugging existing tests nor for skills authoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Response timing, acknowledgment, and making the interface feel alive. Every action deserves a response at the right speed. Use when designing interactions, evaluating responsiveness, or diagnosing why a product feels sluggish or dead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use taste as a competitive moat and business advantage. In the AI and vibe-coding era, execution is commoditized. Taste is the defensible edge. Use when advising founders on product differentiation, building product culture, evaluating why some products win despite fewer features, or understanding taste as a strategic asset.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Visual weight, attention order, and the decisions that guide the eye. Use when building layouts, evaluating information architecture, or diagnosing why a design feels confusing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rank multiple design solutions and explain why. Separate personal preference from quality judgment. Use when comparing design options, evaluating competing approaches, or making design decisions with clear reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Name what was prioritized, what was sacrificed, and whether the tradeoff was right. Every design decision trades something. Use when evaluating design decisions, defending choices, or helping teams understand what they're giving up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Micro-decision analysis. Catalog the border radii, spacing scales, type sizes, and state coverage that most people miss. Use when auditing design systems, evaluating craft quality, or training granular perception.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The 10-second design audit. Look at any design and name what's working and what's not within seconds. Trains rapid pattern recognition for hierarchy, spacing, type, and color. Use when evaluating designs quickly, giving first-impression feedback, or building perception speed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Density, whitespace, rhythm, and how space communicates relationships between elements. Use when building layouts, evaluating spacing consistency, or diagnosing why a design feels cramped or empty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Task sequences, progressive disclosure, and the pacing of an experience over time. Use when designing multi-step flows, evaluating onboarding, or diagnosing why users get lost.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Palette roles, restraint, semantic consistency, and when fewer colors means better design. Use when building color palettes, evaluating color usage, or diagnosing color-related design problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read a designer's taste through their typography decisions alone. Type is the fastest taste signal in any design. Use when evaluating design maturity, assessing portfolio quality, or understanding what typography reveals about design thinking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。