Use when the user starts a non-trivial coding/building task in Claude Code (e.g. "帮我做个 X", "help me build Y", "add feature Z", "搭一个 Z"). Layers an AI-native pedagogical coat over normal coding work — surfaces implicit assumptions in user intent, annotates non-trivial design decisions inline with brief concept-scaffolding for terms the user may not know, and replaces "should I run it?" handoffs with rigorous AI self-verification plus a clean list of what only the user can verify. Skip for pure Q&A, single-line edits, read-only investigation, or refactoring along an existing pattern.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
THU-MAIC/MAIC-Vibe☆ 82026年4月29日 更新
기능의 external behavior를 Cucumber 인수 테스트(주 검증층)로 구축 — .feature 실행으로 문서↔코드 드리프트를 구조적으로 차단, Four Layer(Steps→Protocol Driver→SUT), 태그 기반 가역 제외, 기존 JUnit 인수 테스트 이관. "인수 테스트 도입", "Gherkin을 실행 가능하게", "cucumber 셋업" 요청 시 사용. /cucumber-acceptance로 호출.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
msbaek/msbaek-claude-plugins☆ 82026年10月1日 更新
TDD Planning (Spec Anchored) - 얇은 앵커 문서(규칙 + 예제 검산표 + 미확정)를 에이전트 1회 + 사용자 리뷰 1회로 작성. --full로 3단계 풀 플로우(도메인 규칙→예시→테스트 목록). "TDD 계획 문서", "앵커 문서 작성", "테스트 목록 뽑아줘", "plan 세우고 TDD", "/tdd-plan" 요청 시 사용. 단, 요구사항 원천 문서를 먼저 만드는 것은 /tdd-plan-input, plan 합의 후 자율 구현까지는 /tdd-feature가 적합. /tdd-plan [plan-doc-path] [--full]로 호출.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
msbaek/msbaek-claude-plugins☆ 82026年10月1日 更新
Systematically explore an unfamiliar codebase and build a reusable architecture summary. Use for repo onboarding, understanding legacy or inherited code, mapping architecture before a migration or refactor, tracing a bug or feature path, or answering "what does this project do?". Documentation-first, then data flow — ends in a concise technical architecture summary with file:line evidence, not a raw file dump.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Mine a codebase for breakthrough, evidence-backed opportunities — features, additions, refactors, simplifications, DX, UX, reliability, performance, or architecture cleanup. Researches project reality first, then forces two escalation gates (reject the merely-adequate idea; expand ambition 10x then collapse to the smallest proof-bearing artifact). Outputs ranked opportunities, an escalation ledger, and one plan seed. Does not implement or create tickets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Conduct a Marty-Cagan-style opportunity assessment interview and produce a ~2-page Opportunity Brief in Confluence. Covers business objective, customer, problem, success metric, current alternatives, assumptions/risks, and what we don't know yet. Triggers on "opportunity brief", "opportunity assessment", "discovery brief", "who is this for", "why are we building this", "validate this idea", "product discovery", or any request to frame a feature before implementation. One question at a time. Records accepted research gaps as structured Confluence Decision pages with bidirectional links.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Post-launch review of a shipped PRD against the brief's success metrics. Did we move the metric? What did the data actually show? Which assumptions held, which broke? Which accepted-gap decisions resolved (confirmed vs. invalidated)? What would we do differently? Triggers on "outcome review", "did it work", "post-launch review", "did we move the metric", "retro the feature", "was it worth it". Produces a Confluence outcome-review page and updates the brief + linked decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Work on a Technical Project Plan. Use when starting complex features, cross-platform changes, native module modifications, or multi-session work that needs persistent context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
photostructure/fs-metadata☆ 82026年10月6日 更新
Validate bugs and features that depend on local hosts, localhost, filesystem home state, auth, polling, installed apps, real conversations, or signed native helpers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
clawic/Clawix☆ 82026年6月6日 更新
Load when the user asks for CTO advice on feature strategy, architecture direction, build-vs-buy, infrastructure, market positioning, roadmap, self-hosting, cost, or organizational tradeoffs; not for reviewing an existing implementation-plan workstream.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
islamu-ngo/Event☆ 82026年10月14日 更新
Load for behavior-preserving rename, move, decomposition, dead-code removal, dependency cleanup, record/class conversion, or immutable contract migration that needs caller, flow, test, and impact analysis; not for feature work or one-line cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
islamu-ngo/Event☆ 82026年10月14日 更新
Load when evaluating an Islamic software feature, provider policy, AI behavior, moderation, monetization, privacy, defaults, ranking, self-hosting, or deployment model for provider responsibility and Islamic value-sensitive design; not for generic fiqh rulings or ordinary technical implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
islamu-ngo/Event☆ 82026年10月14日 更新
Load when asked where code lives, how modules relate, what calls a symbol, what implements a feature, or for an architecture/codebase tour using the knowledge graph; not for bug diagnosis, diff review, or refactoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
islamu-ngo/Event☆ 82026年10月14日 更新
Break a feature or project area into frontier items and update `memory/PLAN.md`. Re-run to retire completed work, reorder priorities, or add new items.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
hashintel/brunch☆ 82026年10月13日 更新
Start work on a Jira ticket by fetching ticket details, creating a properly named feature branch, and beginning codebase investigation. Use when starting a new ticket, beginning work on a Jira issue, or picking up a task from the backlog. Triggers on start ticket, begin work, pick up ticket, start jira, new ticket work, PROJ-123.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mParticle/aquarium☆ 82026年10月14日 更新
Guidance on writing high-quality requirements: the requirement quality characteristics and the EARS (Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax) patterns — ubiquitous, event-driven, state-driven, optional-feature, unwanted-behaviour — for unambiguous, singular, verifiable requirements, plus defect/anti-pattern review and verification & traceability. Use when authoring or reviewing requirements. Original synthesis citing EARS (Mavin et al.) and NASA public-domain guidance; not a reproduction of ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148 or the EARS paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs☆ 82026年10月9日 更新
Knowledge base from the DoD M&Q BoK (the Manufacturing and Quality Engineering Body of Knowledge), v3.0 of July 2025, published by OUSD(R&E). Use for the manufacturing-and-quality view of the defense acquisition life cycle: what M&Q engineers do across the Adaptive Acquisition Framework phases (Pre-MDD, Materiel Solution Analysis, Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and Deployment, Operations and Support); the twelve M&Q threads (A–L) built on the '5 Ms'; manufacturing feasibility and producibility; Manufacturing Readiness Levels and assessments; Key/Critical Characteristics and process capability (Cp/Cpk, SPC); the standards stack (AS6500, AS9100/ISO 9001, AS9103, AS9145); technical reviews (ASR/PDR/CDR/PRR) and milestone gates; DCMA surveillance; industrial base and supply chain; and sustainment (LCSP, IPS, ILA, ISR). Scope is DoD acquisition M&Q practice on the Major Capability Acquisition path — it is a best-practice compilation, not policy, and is thin on detailed shop-floor process engineering, contract law, and the full text of the cited industry standards (which it names but does not reproduce).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs☆ 82026年10月9日 更新
Graded exposure for anxiety disorders: Fear hierarchy, SUDs scale, exposure planning and guidance. Psychoeducation only, not implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ellmos-ai/skills☆ 82026年10月14日 更新
Standard procedure for onboarding new software projects: Feature analysis, code quality review, onboarding checklist, and task creation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ellmos-ai/skills☆ 82026年10月14日 更新
8-phase development cycle: Feature requests, current state, functional planning, frontend, backend planning, backend code, tests, use cases. Iterative framework for systematic software development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ellmos-ai/skills☆ 82026年10月14日 更新
Turns a list of merged changes, closed work items or commit messages the user provides into DRAFT release notes under the version heading and date the user supplies, grouped as features, fixes and other, in the organisation's tone from the style guide or prior notes given, with every entry traced to its source item, breaking changes and required actions flagged first, and internal-only items held back for the release owner to confirm. Use when the user asks to "write the release notes for this version", "turn these merged pull requests into a changelog", "summarise what shipped this sprint for customers", "draft the what's new for this release" or "group these closed tickets into release notes". Do not use for an announcement email or intranet post about a launch, use announcement-drafter instead; for a change ticket, use change-request-pack; for a how-to article about one fix, use knowledge-article-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
kesslernity/awesome-copilot-agent-skills☆ 82026年9月19日 更新
Produces a DRAFT product requirements document from the discovery notes, interview summaries, support themes, analytics notes and stakeholder messages the user provides: problem statement, target users, goals with measures as stated, numbered requirements each with a testable acceptance criterion, non-goals, constraints, dependencies and open questions, with every statement tagged evidenced, assumed or UNKNOWN so each assumption is visible for the product owner to confirm. Use when the user asks to "write a PRD", "draft the product requirements", "turn these discovery notes into requirements", "document what this feature needs to do" or "build the requirements doc for this epic". Do not use for supplier-facing requirements in a tender, use rfp-requirements-pack instead; for a technical design decision, use architecture-decision-record; for the change ticket that ships the work, use change-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
kesslernity/awesome-copilot-agent-skills☆ 82026年9月19日 更新
Use when starting creative work (features, components, functionality, or behavior changes) to clarify user intent, requirements, and design before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
thedaviddias/ai-vs-human☆ 82026年6月2日 更新
Use when implementing features or fixing bugs with strict Test-Driven Development (TDD). Activate for coding tasks that require new functionality, refactoring, or comprehensive test coverage, especially when the user mentions TDD or Test Driven Development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
thedaviddias/ai-vs-human☆ 82026年6月2日 更新