「cis」の検索結果

Search the web for evidence using the available Exa tools. Prefer concise results and stop when the question is answered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a compelling sales proposal. Use when the user says "write a sales proposal", "put together a proposal", "draft a proposal for this prospect", "create a business case", "write up our recommendation", "how to structure a proposal", "proposal template", "executive summary for a deal", or wants to create a written document that moves a prospect toward a decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract UX tasks from a product spec and save as ux-tasks.md in the same spec folder. Use this skill when: - The user wants to generate UX work items from a spec - The user says "UX tasks", "what does UX need to do", "extract UX work", "UX deliverables" - The user wants to hand off a spec to the UX/design team - The user asks "what screens need designing" or "what UX decisions are open"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scope a milestone to a fixed time window with variable scope. Use when the user says "scope this milestone", "what fits in the sprint", "cut scope for the release", "define the MVP for this milestone", "we need to ship by [date] what do we cut", "shape the work to fit the cycle", or needs to make hard scope decisions under a time constraint - even if they don't explicitly say "milestone scoping". Based on "Shape Up" by Ryan Singer (appetite, shaping, betting table) and "The Art of Project Management" by Scott Berkun (milestones as forcing functions, scope as a variable).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design statistically rigorous experiments to test data science hypotheses. Use when the user says "design an A/B test", "run an experiment", "test this hypothesis", "is this difference significant", "how many samples do I need", "randomized controlled trial", "causal inference", "uplift test", "holdout group", "significance test", "power calculation", "avoid p-hacking", or needs to determine whether an observed effect is real before making a product or model decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a structured client status report for a consulting engagement. Use when a consultant says "write my weekly status update", "I need to send a status report", "draft the client update", "what should be in the weekly report", "client wants a progress update", "help me write the RAG status", "I need to report on blockers", "end of week update to the client", or "help me communicate what's stuck". Also trigger when someone needs to communicate engagement progress, surface blockers to the client, or flag decisions that need to be made by the sponsor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Communicate data insights to non-technical stakeholders in a structured, persuasive format. Use when the user says "present these findings", "explain this analysis to leadership", "make a data presentation", "tell the story behind the data", "translate this into a business narrative", "make this insight actionable", "stakeholder readout", "executive summary of results", or needs to turn analysis output into a decision-ready document or slide deck.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create concise tutorial websites with task-oriented chapters, reusable templates, and coherent examples with matched highlights and margin notes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Judges whether a user's input suits the Vibe Creating style of video-prompt writing, and when it does, distills single-scene prompts, multi-shot descriptions, emotional imagery, or mixed input into prompts that are easier for a video model to generate from — while preserving any user-specified dialogue, voiceover, music, sound effects, and other hard constraints. Use when a user wants to turn an idea, story, feeling, or rough/over-specified prompt into a strong text-to-video prompt (Seedance, Sora, Kling, Veo, Runway, etc.), or asks to "rewrite", "improve", "clean up", or "vibe-ify" a video prompt. Do NOT use for long narrative films that need precise word-for-word dialogue sync, industrial shot lists meant to be executed verbatim, or functional/UI demos and step-by-step tutorials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

**WORKFLOW SKILL** — Understand before implementing. USE FOR: any task where the agent might rush to code — forces understanding WHY/WHAT FOR/FOR WHOM before defining a solution, activates planning and reasoning discipline, prevents technical debt from shallow requests. Use to validate intent, plan before coding, reason before acting, challenge assumptions, prevent premature implementation. DO NOT USE FOR: deep multi-technology analysis (use contextação), persisting decisions across tasks (use task-map).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

**WORKFLOW SKILL — MANDATORY for ANY hook work.** Create, configure, edit, debug, or review lifecycle hooks for VS Code Copilot (default) and Claude Code. USE FOR: criar/configurar/editar hook, hook do Copilot/Claude/agente, lifecycle hook, PreToolUse, PostToolUse, SessionStart, SubagentStop, Stop hook, UserPromptSubmit, PreCompact, bloquear comando, validar tool call, injetar contexto, guard, .agent.md frontmatter hooks, hooks.json, .github/hooks, .claude/settings.json, hook Node.js, cross-platform, hook não dispara/silencioso/ignorado, permissionDecision, hookSpecificOutput, additionalContext. **DEFAULT = VS Code GitHub Copilot.** Switch to Claude Code only when user explicitly says "Claude" OR workspace has `.claude/`. NEVER assume Claude. DO NOT USE FOR: general coding, creating agents (use agent-creator), creating skills (use skill-creator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Save a user-selected answer, decision, insight, or session summary into an Obsidian vault as one reviewed transaction. Use only when the user explicitly asks to preserve specific conversation content, not when they supply a file or URL to ingest. Triggers: /save, save this, save that answer, file this conversation, save this analysis, keep this insight, preserve this chat result.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the Fable-derived 10-stage OBSERVE, OBSERVE, LISTEN, THINK, CONNECT, CONNECT, FEEL, ACCEPT, CREATE, GROW loop to consequential or ambiguous reasoning and decisions. Use for think this through, deep think, architecture review, postmortem, tradeoff analysis, or challenges to assumptions. This is a reasoning review, not a deterministic vault health check or repair workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refresh Claude Ads platform, API, policy, regulation, benchmark, issue, pull-request, fork, and repository evidence. Use for ads research refresh, expired refresh_due dates, stale API or platform claims, reverify-or-demote decisions, release-current claim validation, ecosystem review, current platform changes, or updating paid-media knowledge. When tools or sources are unavailable, still demote the stale claim for the current run and block dependent release-current assertions before requesting access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and evaluate paid-ad experiments with hypotheses, randomization units, sample-size and duration assumptions, guardrails, platform experiment tools, analysis, and decision rules. Use for A/B test, split test, experiment design, hypothesis, statistical significance, sample size, test duration, or experiment readout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user wants to create or improve a presentation for an academic context — conference papers, seminar talks, thesis defenses, grant briefings, lab meetings, invited lectures, or any presentation where the audience will evaluate reasoning and evidence. Triggers include: 'conference talk', 'seminar slides', 'thesis defense', 'research presentation', 'academic deck', 'academic presentation'. Also triggers when the user asks to 'make slides' in combination with academic content (e.g., 'make slides for my paper on X', 'create a presentation for my dissertation defense', 'build a deck for my grant proposal'). This skill governs CONTENT and STRUCTURE decisions. For the technical work of creating or editing the .pptx file itself, also read the pptx SKILL.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses GKE nodes reporting NotReady or Unknown status by inspecting node conditions, events, kubelet/containerd logs, and node metrics, then proposing safe remediations. Use when nodes show NotReady, when the kubelet stops posting node status, or when workloads are evicted or stuck Pending due to node health. Don't use for pod-level application failures (use gke-workload-troubleshooting), autoscaler scale-up/scale-down decisions (use gke-cluster-autoscaler), or non-GKE compute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision guide for delegating to caveman-style subagents. Tells the main thread WHEN to spawn `cavecrew-investigator` (locate code), `cavecrew-builder` (1-2 file edit), or `cavecrew-reviewer` (diff review) instead of doing the work inline or using vanilla `Explore`. Subagent output is caveman-compressed so the tool-result injected back into main context is ~60% smaller — main context lasts longer across long sessions. Trigger: "delegate to subagent", "use cavecrew", "spawn investigator/builder/reviewer", "save context", "compressed agent output".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flip core assumptions to reveal hidden constraints and alternative approaches - "what if the opposite were true?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when gathering, structuring, and documenting requirements for a Financial Services Cloud (FSC) wealth management implementation — including financial planning workflow discovery, portfolio review process mapping, client lifecycle requirements, advisor tooling needs, and FSC architecture determination (managed package vs. FSC Core). Trigger keywords: wealth management requirements, FSC requirements gathering, financial planning workflow, portfolio review process, advisor tools setup, FSC data model scoping, wealth management process mapping. NOT for implementation, configuration, or code — use financial-account-setup, fsc-action-plans, or apex/fsc-financial-calculations for those. NOT for FSC architecture decisions — use architect/wealth-management-architecture. NOT for Health Cloud or NPSP requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Requirements for a Salesforce Enterprise Territory Management (ETM) territory design: alignment criteria, coverage model selection, assignment rule logic, hierarchy depth and breadth, and user-to-territory ratios. Trigger keywords: territory design, territory alignment, territory model requirements, sales coverage model, territory criteria, geographic territory, named account territory, overlay territory. NOT for ETM setup steps — use admin/enterprise-territory-management. NOT for loading territory assignment data — use data/territory-data-alignment. Trigger keywords: territory design questionnaire, territory requirements document, assignment rule matrix, territory type priority, realignment plan, territory access level decision, accountAccessLevel, opportunityAccessLevel, ObjectTerritory2Association, UserTerritory2Association, Planning state model, territory acceptance tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-tool decision matrix for field-update automation in Salesforce — Before-Save Flow vs After-Save Flow vs Apex Trigger vs the deprecated Workflow Rule + Field Update. Covers the recursion / re-entrancy rules, governor cost per pattern (Before-Save flow is governor-free for the same record), the order-of-execution slot each tool occupies, and the Workflow-Rule-to-Flow migration playbook for field-update actions. NOT for the full record-save order of execution — use apex/order-of-execution-deep-dive. NOT for building the record-triggered Flow once the tool is chosen — use flow/record-triggered-flow-patterns. Trigger keywords: WorkflowFieldUpdate, reevaluateOnChange, onCreateOrTriggeringUpdate, doesRequireRecordChangedToMeetCriteria, failedMigrationToolVersion, Migrate to Flow, workflow-meta.xml, field update deprecated, double writer, second trigger pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when building or maintaining a Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) on a Salesforce project: one row per requirement, columns for source, user-story id(s), test-case id(s), defect id(s), sprint, release, and status. Covers forward traceability (req → story → code → test) and backward traceability (test → req). Trigger keywords: RTM, requirements traceability matrix, audit trail for salesforce delivery, traceability for steerco, deferred requirement tracking, regulatory traceability. NOT for eliciting the requirements in the first place — use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf. NOT for user-story authoring — use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce. NOT for UAT test design — use admin/uat-test-case-design. NOT for Apex test design — use apex/test-class-standards. NOT for backlog prioritization — use admin/moscow-prioritization-for-sf-backlog. More triggers: traceability.md, build-layer traceability, REQ-XXX and FG-XXX id mapping, artefact-to-requirement orphan report, coverage-gap report, check_rtm.py --manifest-dir, owning run-time agent column, design decision ref column, metadata API name in a traceability row.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。