5,561 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when starting any conversation involving bundle-plugins — blueprinting, scaffolding, authoring, auditing, testing, optimizing, or releasing. Also use when feeling unsure which bundles-forge skill applies
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing, completing, improving, or adapting SKILL.md and agents/*.md in a bundle-plugin — integrating external skills, filling scaffolded stubs, or rewriting for better triggering and token efficiency
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the weak-agent adversarial test harness against docx-cli. Spawns weak exercise agents (Haiku by default, Sonnet to probe, or a local agent harness's pre-produced runs) to perform real document tasks over six scenarios — five editing (MNDA form-fill + font fidelity, invoice table-edit/restructure + logo replace, résumé styling, contract redlining + commenting, contract finalize via accept/reject + comment reply/resolve) and one authoring (T. S. Eliot poetry journal: multi-column, verse, footnotes, links, figure) — renders every result with Word, has opus judge them against ground-truth rubrics, measures each exercise's tool economy, token cost, wall-clock, and correctness (from transcripts for Claude, the exercise.json ledger for the local harness), and synthesizes a prioritized ergonomics report. Use when the user says 'adversarial review', 'test docx-cli with weak agents', 'run the haiku harness', 'weak agent test', or wants to re-run yesterday's adversarial process.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect an unfamiliar repository, interpret a broad Markdown user journey at runtime, operate the real product through its supported web, API, CLI, desktop, or mobile surface, and produce an auditable pass, fail, or blocked judgment with screenshots, logs, recordings, and a step timeline when available. Use when asked to run smoke tests, validate an end-to-end user journey, dogfood a product, test a release candidate, or execute a non-deterministic workflow that may include authentication or human checkpoints. Do not use as a substitute for deterministic unit, integration, or scenario tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create truthful, human-centered marketing campaigns for an app or product, including positioning, channel copy, original artwork, editable layouts, README banners, and selective website integration. Use when asked to make launch materials, promotional artwork, social assets, campaign kits, ads, or marketing content from an existing product; to adapt a visual reference without copying it; or to add approved campaign art to product surfaces. Do not invent claims, fake UI, publish, deploy, or replace product proof without explicit evidence and authorization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Vulnerability and security scan (defensive, your own repo): dependency CVEs plus risky code patterns (secrets, injection, weak authz), severity x reachability triaged and remediated without suppressing. Complements the built-in /security-review. Triggers on "absolute audit", "security audit", "are we vulnerable", "scan for CVEs", "check for secrets/injection", "harden this".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refine a Stage2 NeurIPS rebuttal draft into polished, reviewer-facing prose in the author's style; preserve factual grounding, optionally prepend a courteous opening phrase, and normalize tables/code/formulas into Markdown.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refine a Stage2 ICML rebuttal draft into polished, reviewer-facing prose in the author's style; preserve factual grounding, optionally prepend a courteous opening phrase, and normalize tables/code/formulas into Markdown.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refine a Stage2 ARR (ACL Rolling Review) rebuttal draft into polished, reviewer-facing prose in the author's style; preserve factual grounding, optionally prepend a courteous opening phrase, and normalize tables/code/formulas into Markdown.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refine a Stage2 ICLR rebuttal draft into polished, reviewer-facing prose in the author's style; preserve factual grounding, optionally prepend a courteous opening phrase, and normalize tables/code/formulas into Markdown.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify the accuracy of claims and statements by extracting individual assertions, identifying authoritative sources, cross-referencing evidence, and assigning confidence-scored verdicts. Use when the user requests fact checking or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a broad, authorized security audit across application, infrastructure, identity, dependencies, and operations. Use when the user needs a scoped security posture review; use the SAST, DAST, dependency-scanning, or threat-modeling skill when the request is limited to one specialist activity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a preliminary, evidence-based EU AI Act readiness assessment across AI-system inventory, territorial scope, operator roles, prohibited-practice screening, risk classification, transparency, high-risk controls, general-purpose AI obligations, governance, and implementation milestones. Use when an organization needs to triage an AI use case, vendor, model, product, or portfolio for Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; prepare an AI inventory, gap register, implementation roadmap, or counsel briefing; assess provider, deployer, importer, distributor, product-manufacturer, authorised-representative, or GPAI-provider responsibilities; or re-check readiness after regulatory or product changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and verify auditable human oversight, approval gates, escalation paths, and safe state transitions for AI agent workflows. Use when deciding which agent actions require review, adding approve/reject or dual-control flows, preventing unauthorized autonomous effects, creating decision records, reducing rubber-stamping, or recovering safely from rejected, expired, or failed actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, execute, document, and retest authorized security assessments of AI agents and multi-agent workflows using safe adversarial cases, synthetic identities, canaries, and evidence-based findings. Use when defining red-team rules of engagement, assessing prompt injection or excessive agency, testing tool and identity boundaries, evaluating memory or cross-agent attacks, scoring a campaign, or verifying remediation in an approved environment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, implement, harden, and verify Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers with precise tool contracts, least-privilege authorization, safe transports, structured errors, and interoperability tests. Use when creating a new MCP server, exposing an API or data source through MCP, reviewing an MCP server design, adding or revising MCP tools, or preparing an MCP server for production.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Integrate with external APIs using REST clients, webhook consumers, SDK wrappers, and polling patterns with proper authentication, error handling, and retry logic. Use when the user requests api integration or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Flavor & Fragrance Chemist. Use when a task calls for Flavor & Fragrance Chemist judgment. Reasons from odor activity values, threshold perception, matrix release, and degradation kinetics through GC-MS with retention indices, GC-O/AEDA, chiral GC authentication, ISO 8586 trained sensory panels, and IFRA/FEMA regulatory limits while treating aldehyde oxidation, citral cyclization, top-note fade, and allergen exceedance as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Environmental Policy Analyst. Use when a task calls for Environmental Policy Analyst judgment. Reasons from statutory authority, baseline definition, and monetization boundaries through NEPA/ESA compliance, Circular A-4 RIAs, EPA SC-GHG and benefit transfer, IAM/IPCC scenario use, and APA regulatory comment while treating discount-rate dominance, weak transfer extrapolation, IAM structural uncertainty, and baseline inflation as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Cell Biologist. Use when a task calls for Cell Biologist judgment. Reasons from compartment thermodynamics, membrane electrophysics, and necessity-plus-sufficiency logic through STR authentication, confocal/TIRF imaging, CRISPR and siRNA perturbation with rescue, and Western blot, treating mycoplasma, passage and serum-lot drift, edge effects, antibody cross-reactivity, siRNA seed off-targets, and well-as-n pseudoreplication as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Composite any two HTML screens into a locked photo plate of hands holding an open foldable phone — a 1448×1086 still with two blank 495×849 / 498×849 screen slots (left and right) — to make side-by-side meme and comparison videos: TikTok vs Reels, ChatGPT vs Claude, "me vs my friend", before/after, two apps racing. Trigger on: "foldable phone meme", "put X on the left screen and Y on the right", "two-screen comparison video", "the dual-screen phone meme", or any request that names two apps/feeds/chats to show at once. The plate, geometry, and camera are finished — the agent only authors what plays INSIDE the two screens and renders.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Kerberos-based Active Directory attacks driven by hand with standard tooling (Kerberoasting, AS-REP roasting, and delegation abuse: unconstrained, constrained/S4U, RBCD). Use when the target has SPN-bearing service accounts, accounts without pre-authentication, or delegation configured on computer/user objects, and you want the exact impacket/Rubeus/bloodyAD command, the hash format and hashcat mode, the Windows Event IDs that fire, and the remediation to write up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A high-level conceptual mapping from Active Directory attack techniques to the compliance controls they touch. Kerberoasting relates to authentication and logging, so it brushes ENS op.acc.5 / op.exp.8, NIS2 Art.21(2)(h), DORA RTS Art.9 / Art.21. Use this when a reader wants to understand which regulatory control an AD finding relates to, or to add an orientation note to a technical finding. This is a conceptual, orientative mapping only; it is NOT an auditor-defensible, curated, ID-by-ID control matrix. Covers ENS (op.acc.*, op.exp.*), NIS2 (Directive 2022/2555 Art.21), and DORA (RTS 2024/1774).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The telemetry each Active Directory technique generates and what alerts a defender: Kerberoasting produces Event 4769 with RC4 encryption (0x17) and an MDI alert, DCSync produces Event 4662 with the DS-Replication-Get-Changes GUID, AS-REP roasting produces Event 4768 with no pre-auth, LSASS dumping is blocked by EDR, plus a lateral-movement telemetry table by protocol (SMB/WMI/WinRM/RDP/DCOM). Use this whenever you run or plan an offensive AD technique and need to know what noise it makes, when writing the engagement's detection notes, or when a defender wants to know what to monitor. Teaches red teamers what is loud and blue teamers what to watch. Standard-tooling knowledge, no vendor engine.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。