「capability」の検索結果

Statically analyzes Linux ELF malware: ELF header and sections, dynamic symbols and imports, segment permissions, embedded strings, and packing indicators to infer capability without execution. Activates for requests to analyze an ELF binary, Linux malware, or shared object.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes remote access trojan command-and-control by mapping the RAT command set, identifying the C2 transport and beacon parameters, and cataloging operator capabilities from static strings and config. Activates for requests to analyze RAT C2, map a trojan command handler, or identify remote-access capabilities and C2 transport.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Business Continuity Planner — running a business impact analysis (BIA) to derive recovery time objectives, mapping process dependencies to find single points of failure, evaluating whether current recovery capability meets a process's maximum tolerable downtime, designing or debriefing a tabletop exercise, or building the cost-benefit case for a continuity investment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query and answer questions about Volcengine API specifications. Use when the user asks about API parameters, error codes, request methods, enum values, required fields, response structures, pagination, parameter dependencies, service capability lists, API availability, or API comparisons, even if they do not explicitly say "API". Typical intent includes checking what an action supports, which fields are required, what values a parameter accepts, why an API returns a specific error, how to pass nested or body parameters, how pagination works, what an API response contains, whether a batch operation exists, what services or versions expose an operation, or how two APIs differ. Use API Explorer data as the authoritative source and preserve constraints, examples, and caveats found in the spec. Answer in Chinese or English. When the user needs runnable SDK code, language-specific examples, or SDK configuration, hand off to volcengine-sdk-generator. When they need CLI operations, hand off to volcengine-cli.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

List, select, and install Volcengine skills from the volcengine-skills marketplace. Use when a user asks which Volcengine skill or plugin handles a task, wants to browse every available skill, needs an optional skill that is not currently installed, or asks to install or check the installation status of a Volcengine skill. Also use to discover any core skill, including this finder. Use as a fallback during a Volcengine operation when the currently loaded or installed skills cannot cover the required product, tool, or workflow; inspect the full catalog, select the missing capability, and install it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for Tauri v2 plugin permission authoring, capability generation, and platform differences.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safe systematic dependency upgrade with vulnerability scanning and rollback capability. Detects project ecosystem, audits outdated and vulnerable packages, presents a prioritized upgrade plan, and executes upgrades one at a time with test verification after each. Use when updating dependencies, fixing vulnerability alerts, or performing periodic dependency maintenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze manufacturing defect detection and quality control systems — computer vision inspection pipelines, SPC control charts, Six Sigma process capability (Cp/Cpk), defect classification taxonomies, root cause analysis tooling, and measurement system analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify gaps between current and desired state. Use when the user says "gap analysis", "what's missing", "current vs future state", "where are the gaps", "capability gap", "maturity assessment", "fit-gap analysis", "what needs to change", "compare current to target", "readiness assessment" - even if they don't explicitly say "gap analysis".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft or explicitly apply a paid-ad campaign launch through Claude Ads capability-gated adapters. Use for campaign creation, launch plans, publishing ads, activating campaigns, uploading creative, or requests to push a campaign live.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and draft or explicitly apply paid-ad optimizations using evidence, financial constraints, experiments, and capability-gated adapters. Use for campaign optimization, budget reallocation, bid changes, pausing or archiving ads, requests to delete campaigns, search-term or negative-keyword actions, creative rotation, or improving CPA and ROAS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A self-evolution engine for AI agents. Analyzes runtime history to identify improvements and applies protocol-constrained evolution. Communicates with EvoMap Hub via local Proxy mailbox.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Presentation/Core/Engine split control plane — the canonical entry point for any work decomposing the Yuzu server into three binaries (presentation · core · engine) per ADR-0031-presentation-core-engine-decomposition / ADR-0032 (the admission interlock) / ADR-0033 (access-control spine). Use when the user says "/split", "/pce-split", "/decomposition", asks to plan or implement a split workstream (WS-A*, WS-B*, WS-X*), asks "what's our gap to the presentation/core split" or "is it safe to extract presentation/the engine yet", asks to audit split readiness, or starts work touching the seam (handlers calling stores directly, the INV-31-4 contract test, the Drogon port, `server/presentation` or `server/engine`, the `uce` DB grants, component service identity, or the ADR-0032 admission/grant/audit substrate — `use_case_run_id`, the release log, the capability-declaration registry).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designing or reviewing Agentforce actions: Flow actions, Apex invocable actions, prompt-template actions, action naming, input and output contracts, confirmation requirements, and safe error behavior. Triggers: 'agent actions', 'build an agent that can look up an order', 'make the agent able to check order status', 'give the agent a capability', 'agent that can retrieve a record', 'flow action for agent', 'agent invocable action', 'action schema design'. NOT for writing the Apex class itself — use agentforce/custom-agent-actions-apex. NOT for the reason_code error envelope that stops an agent retry loop — use agentforce/agent-action-error-handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Eliciting, documenting and structuring requirements for a Salesforce implementation: stakeholder discovery interviews, As-Is and To-Be process mapping, and gap analysis against standard Salesforce capability. Trigger keywords: requirements gathering, user story, As-Is To-Be, gap analysis, stakeholder interview, process mapping, business requirements, fit gap. NOT for authoring the user stories themselves - use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce. NOT for scoring requirements against a specific org - use admin/fit-gap-analysis-against-org. NOT for technical design decisions - use architect/solution-design-patterns. Also covers the requirements catalogue itself (one row per requirement, MoSCoW priority, source stakeholder, downstream target) and Salesforce non-functional requirements: record volume, sharing layer, integration pattern, reporting joins, mobile/offline, and licence implication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrating Classic Custom Buttons (Detail Page Buttons, List Buttons, Mass Action Buttons) and JavaScript Buttons to Lightning Quick Actions, Screen Flow Actions, LWC Quick Actions, and headless Quick Actions. Covers JavaScript-button-to-action translation patterns (sforce.apex.execute → Apex action, navigation alerts → toast events, MassAction.update → record-collection processing), URL button translation, and the irreversible loss of Classic JavaScript button capability in Lightning. NOT for new Quick Action design (use admin/global-actions-and-quick-actions) or Lightning record page composition (use admin/lightning-app-builder-advanced).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete MCP engineering work on the live path: build or repair servers and Apps, debug stdio or Streamable HTTP, migrate protocol/SDK/transport versions, reconcile source with package and activated runtime, inspect capability/effect authorization, and verify named-host claims without promoting weaker evidence. Use for real Model Context Protocol implementation, review, migration, runtime, or host-integration tasks. Do not use for ordinary non-MCP APIs, generic frontend work, or incidental product copy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, audit, harden, review, or upgrade MCP servers and MCP Apps with revision-aware protocol profiles, explicit HTTP/deployment boundaries, capability-centered validation, bilingual reporting, and reproducible evidence. Use for MCP server architecture, JSON-RPC or Streamable HTTP bugs, security hardening, protocol-version migration, MCP Apps widget boundaries, review reconciliation, test planning, and public engineering evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design or implement reusable capability in the dygo framework, Core App, Studio App, runtime, or public SDK. Use when changing dygo itself rather than building a Business App.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-activate for litestar_security, SecurityPlugin, SecurityConfig, SecureController, CurrentUser, Principal, SecurityContext, or requires_role/scope/tenant/capability/assurance. Not for basic Litestar Guards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when publishing a local PRD Markdown file to DingTalk Docs or Drive with version-history preflight and read-back, or when validating an approved Product Delivery Package through its fail-closed dry-run path. Package mode real writes require a trusted host approval capability and are unavailable in the current Agent runtime.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit agent runtimes and their tests for lifecycle inference, capability overload, context pollution, correlated verification, prompt-only control, false success, dead compatibility paths, test-only seams, and complexity without contribution. Use for whole-repository agent audits, slop or dead-code triage, test contribution reviews, large refactors, tool/context simplification, and cleanup requests that need proof before deleting code or tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, implement, or evaluate GEODE's GEO capability with source-grounded stage diagnosis, frozen measurement contracts, and no-model preflight before live engine runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add or update a GEODE model or provider from current primary documentation and repository call-site evidence. Use for model IDs, context limits, pricing, reasoning controls, provider routes, capability gates, or fallback changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。