Maintain AuthCrunch's YAML HTTP contract, deterministic JSON/YAML exports, Scalar reference and local server. Use after HTTP-facing source/configuration changes, source-review drift, or API reference tooling changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
2,997 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Maintain AuthCrunch's YAML HTTP contract, deterministic JSON/YAML exports, Scalar reference and local server. Use after HTTP-facing source/configuration changes, source-review drift, or API reference tooling changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent adversarial code review. Spawns three reviewer subagents (Auditor, Adversary, Pragmatist) on a single model, runs a cross-examination round, then deterministically synthesizes a single ranked report. Use this for non-trivial PRs, security-sensitive changes, refactors that touch many files, or any change where one perspective has obvious blind spots. Trigger phrases include "adverse review", "adversarial review", "multi-perspective review", "review my changes from multiple angles", "panel review". NOT suitable for trivial diffs (typos, dependency bumps, formatting).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a holistic, human-reviewer-style critique of the currently staged Git changes (or, with `--working-copy`, of all uncommitted changes, with `--branch`, of a branch against its base, or, with `--commit`, of a single commit) and emit an approve/reject verdict with prioritized, severity-tagged, line-cited findings. Use when the user wants the staged diff, a branch, or a commit "reviewed", "critiqued", or "code-reviewed".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug Streamlit frontend and backend changes using make debug with hot-reload. Use when testing code changes, investigating bugs, checking UI behavior, or needing screenshots of the running app.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user says "minimize this ty ecosystem change", "reproduce this ecosystem result", "investigate a primer difference", "investigate a mypy_primer difference", "investigate a mypy-primer difference", or asks to reproduce, investigate, or minimize behavior changes in ty ecosystem/primer/mypy_primer/mypy-primer projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review changes in samples/book-app-web for accessibility, responsive layout, tests/build validation, and small beginner-safe changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a self-contained HTML changelog report showing recent documentation changes with interactive course generation buttons. Use this skill when the user asks for a docs changelog, documentation report, what changed recently, recent doc updates as a report, or runs `/docs --report`. Discovers changes via git history, categorizes them, summarizes what's new, and produces a stunning Obsidian & Amber themed HTML report where each entry has a "Create Course" button that copies the course command to clipboard.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create and manage Architecture Decision Records (ADRs). Use when making architectural changes (refactoring, API versioning, new domain layers, schema changes), when reviewing recent commits for documentation needs, or when the user mentions ADR, architecture decisions, or documenting technical decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when uncommitted changes need to be split into atomic, conventional commits ordered for review. Triggers on "commit this", "make commits", "clean up commits", "commit the changes". In Hedgehog, each Loop step is already meant to be its own commit — this skill matters most when a Correction Protocol fast-forward touches several steps at once and those fixes need splitting back into per-step commits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a markdown report documenting codebase changes from the current session — files added, modified, deleted, and a summary of what was done.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or update an ADR under `docs/ADR/` for architectural decisions, dependency changes, data-model changes, or cross-cutting policy shifts. Use when the user asks to write, update, or document an ADR, record a design decision, capture architecture trade-offs, or justify a repo-wide technical policy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured workflow for summarizing code changes after completing tasks. Creates clear, actionable summaries of what was changed, why, and what to verify.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Independent re-derivation gate for proposed changes during autonomous execution. Evaluates a change (code diff, config edit, engine evolution, schema change) against the work's authority matrix and a 4-check protocol: invariant compliance, scope authorization, detection narrowness, and regression risk. Returns structured JSON with pass/fail per check, an overall verdict (APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES / REJECT), and blockers. Profile-driven thresholds (strict for unattended runs, lenient for desk supervision). Use when an autonomous agent proposes an engine change, when reviewing a Claude Code-authored modification before merge, or when an unattended profile requires independent re-derivation. Trigger on: "review/approve this proposed change," "critic-gate this," "is this change safe," "is this safe to merge," "should I let this land," "run the critic." Do NOT use for handoff-readiness checks (use rootnode-handoff-trigger-check), general code review, or design-time correctness. Authority matrix required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage change control for validated computerized systems. Covers change request triage (emergency, standard, minor), impact assessment on validated state, revalidation scope determination, approval workflows, implementation tracking, and post-change verification. Use when a validated system requires a software upgrade, patch, or configuration change; when infrastructure changes affect validated systems; when a CAPA requires system modification; or when emergency changes need expedited approval and retrospective documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage maintenance problems by severity, document findings with context, route to appropriate specialist agent or human, and create actionable issue reports. Use when a maintenance task encounters problems beyond automated cleanup: code that is unsafe to delete, configuration changes requiring domain expertise, breaking changes detected during cleanup, complex refactoring needed, or security-sensitive findings such as hardcoded secrets or vulnerabilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create and manage pull requests using GitHub CLI. Covers branch preparation, writing PR titles and descriptions, creating PRs, handling review feedback, and merge/cleanup workflows. Use when proposing changes from a feature or fix branch for review, merging completed work into the main branch, requesting code review from collaborators, or documenting the purpose and scope of a set of changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply semantic versioning (SemVer 2.0.0) to determine the correct version bump based on change analysis. Covers major/minor/patch classification, pre-release identifiers, build metadata, and breaking change detection. Use when preparing a new release to determine the correct version number, after merging changes before tagging, evaluating whether a change constitutes a breaking change, adding pre-release identifiers, or resolving disagreement about what version bump is appropriate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain and publish the advisor-owned current research state, durable research-ideas syntheses, and dataset analysis. Use when evidence or human guidance changes the research focus or direction, durable research ideas should be recorded, or dataset understanding changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Incrementally update Mintlify documentation (.mdx) from Python source changes only. Use when: (1) Python files referenced in doc_code_map frontmatter have changed, (2) a PR touches Python modules documented in docs/mintlify/key_modules/ or docs/mintlify/mcp/, (3) the user asks to sync docs after Python code changes. Prefer minimal diffs and leave correct content untouched.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create conventional commit messages by analyzing staged changes. Generates semantic commit messages following the Conventional Commits specification. Use when user says "commit", "save changes", or "create commit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Force `rust-embed` to re-embed assets from `$GRAFEMA_UI_DIST` (or any env-driven path) when cargo's incremental compilation skips the macro re-expansion. Use when: (1) you rebuilt the GUI bundle but the rust-server binary still serves the OLD bundle, (2) `cargo build --release` finishes in seconds (incremental hit) and `strings target/release/binary | grep <new-hash>` finds nothing, (3) any rust-embed pipeline where assets live outside the cargo source tree and are picked up via env var or symlink. Cargo only re-runs the proc macro when the rust file declaring `#[derive(RustEmbed)]` changes — env var changes alone don't trigger it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes upstream fork PR changes and ports selected items into the local branch. Use when checking upstream PRs, porting upstream changes, or planning selective upstream integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create conventional commit messages by analyzing staged changes. Generates semantic commit messages following the Conventional Commits specification. Use when user says "commit", "save changes", or "create commit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply product-grounded visual quality constraints during user-visible UI changes. Use for layout, styling, content hierarchy, theming, responsive behavior, or interaction affordances. Stay inactive for logic-only changes that preserve the rendered interface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。