「compute」の検索結果

Audit, prepare, and deploy PAIDF Orchestration on a Kubernetes GPU cluster - single-GPU H100/L40S hosts, managed Kubernetes, kubeadm, and similar. Select for requests to set up, install, deploy, configure, or check a PAIDF Orchestration environment; run a workflow on a new or unverified GPU host; connect via kubeconfig; validate GPU compute; deploy the Airflow controller; or choose external versus in-cluster model services. A plain SSH host is not a supported backend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Techniques for reducing peak GPU memory in Megatron Bridge — expandable segments, PEFT + SP input re-gather, parallelism resizing, activation recompute, CPU offloading constraints, and common OOM fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate and use MoE expert-parallel communication overlap in Megatron-Bridge, including overlap_moe_expert_parallel_comm, delay_wgrad_compute, and flex dispatcher backends such as DeepEP and HybridEP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Long-context MoE training guidance for Megatron Bridge. Covers CP sizing, selective recompute, dispatcher choices, and practical patterns from DSV3, Qwen3, and Qwen3-Next long-context experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user is doing hands-on DOCA DPA host-side work on a BlueField — creating the `doca_dpa` Core context, loading a DPACC-compiled DPA app image (`doca_dpa_app`), creating DPA threads, launching kernels via `doca_dpa_kernel_launch_update_*`, draining `doca_dpa_completion`, running `doca_dpa_cap_*` discovery, choosing between the DPA comm component (inter-DPA messaging) and the DPA verbs component (in-kernel RDMA), or debugging `DOCA_ERROR_*` from `doca_dpa_*`. Trigger even without "DOCA DPA" or "Data-Path Accelerator": "run compute on the DPA from my host", "DPA kernel hangs, no completion", "DOCA_ERROR_DRIVER on launch", "DOCA/DPACC version skew", or "does this BlueField expose a DPA". Route elsewhere for DPA-side kernel programming itself, DPACC compiler internals, host↔DPU messaging (doca-comch), host-side RDMA (doca-rdma), and GPU-initiated networking (doca-gpunetio).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing or evaluating a startup revenue model, pricing/value metric, packaging/tier design, or calculating unit economics (LTV, CAC, payback, gross margin, NRR), including usage-based/credit/AI pricing and variable compute/COGS constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds an Azure portal deep link to a specific blade/menu item for supported Microsoft.ContainerService, Microsoft.Kubernetes, and Microsoft.Compute resources using the aks-search-direct-mid semantic search API. WHEN: 'find where in the Azure portal to do something', 'search the portal for an operation', 'construct a portal link from a search query and a resource'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure Machine Learning SDK v2 for Python. Use for ML workspaces, jobs, models, datasets, compute, and pipelines. Triggers: "azure-ai-ml", "MLClient", "workspace", "model registry", "training jobs", "datasets".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, deploy, operate, and troubleshoot multi-rack (rack scale) deployments of Azure Local — preintegrated racks scaling to hundreds of machines, built on Network Fabric Controller, Cluster Manager, SAN storage, and managed network fabric. Use for the Microsoft.NetworkCloud and Microsoft.ManagedNetworkFabric control plane. NOT for standard 1-16 node Azure Local, and NOT for rack-aware clusters (two racks as availability zones, up to 8 nodes, synchronous replication) — those are standard scale. WHEN: multi-rack, rack scale Azure Local, aggregation rack, compute rack, Network Fabric Controller, NFC, Cluster Manager, network fabric, isolation domain, az networkcloud, az networkfabric, multi-rack logical network, multi-rack Arc VM.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculates molecular descriptors and fingerprints using RDKit. Computes Morgan fingerprints (ECFP), MACCS keys, Lipinski properties, QED drug-likeness, TPSA, and 3D conformer descriptors. Use when featurizing molecules for machine learning or filtering by drug-likeness criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare Hi-C contact matrices between conditions to identify differential chromatin interactions. Compute log2 fold changes, statistical significance, and visualize differential contact maps. Use when comparing Hi-C contacts between conditions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Balance, normalize, and transform Hi-C contact matrices using cooler and cooltools. Apply iterative correction (ICE), compute expected values, and generate observed/expected matrices. Use when normalizing or transforming Hi-C matrices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify likely causal variants within GWAS loci using SuSiE for sum of single effects regression and FINEMAP for shotgun stochastic search. Computes posterior inclusion probabilities and credible sets to prioritize variants for functional follow-up. Use when narrowing GWAS association signals to candidate causal variants or building credible sets for functional validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test whether two traits share a causal variant at a genomic locus using Bayesian colocalization with coloc. Computes posterior probabilities for shared vs distinct causal variants between GWAS and eQTL signals. Use when determining if a GWAS signal and an eQTL share the same causal variant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect crowded speculative positioning in CFTC futures markets (COT report analysis) to find contrarian setups using Jason Shapiro's methodology. Screens large-speculator ("non-commercial") net positioning across 65 futures markets (indices, rates, FX, metals, energy, crypto) via the FMP Commitment of Traders API, computes a 3-year and 26-week COT Index per market, and classifies extremes as CROWDED_LONG / CROWDED_SHORT. Use when the user asks about COT report analysis, crowded positioning, "who is trapped", speculative positioning extremes, contrarian futures setups, or wants to run Jason Shapiro-style analysis. This skill automates crowding DETECTION only (step 1 of 5) — it does not generate trade signals by itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Model selection by provider health, not task complexity. Tier 0 (local) handles most tasks. Paid models are break-glass only. Fallbacks activate on 429 or timeout — never on perceived task difficulty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "track our share of voice", "what share of the conversation do we own vs competitors", or "trend our SOV this quarter"; computes SOV% = brand mentions ÷ (brand + competitor panel mentions) per platform per period on a LOCKED competitor panel — a panel switch invalidates the trend (restart the series and log the break; the ECHO O3 rule) — plus a sentiment-weighted SOV variant (sentiment labeled Estimated unless human-coded) and a Wikipedia-pageviews attention-share alternative; built from keyless listening connectors, gdelt.py news echo, and user exports — public counts only, closed platforms are never scraped. Not for backlink or offsite SEO signals — use offsite-signal-analyzer. 声量份额/竞品声量对比/提及份额/注意力份额

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "review this influencer content" or "check if this post meets brand guidelines"; runs the typed STAR pre-publish gate, scores Trust and Appeal on the deliverable, folds in the creator Suitability read, computes the profile-weighted SQS, checks the disclosure/claim/brand-safety and fraud/fake-engagement vetoes, and writes constructive revision feedback. Not for drafting the brief — use brief-generator; not for partnership terms — use contract-helper. 达人内容审核/发布前质检

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show session analytics, learning patterns, correction trends, heatmaps, and productivity metrics. Computes stats from project memory and session history. Use when asking for stats, statistics, progress, how am I doing, coding history, or dashboard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry point for AI-agent work on AWS: pick a runtime, plan a migration for existing workloads, and build an executable POC — one phased flow. Triggers on: which runtime for my agent, AgentCore vs ECS vs EKS vs Lambda, AgentCore vs Lambda MicroVMs, deploy an AI agent on AWS, agent architecture on AWS, I have an agent idea what do I build, move/migrate my agents to AWS, agent migration plan, add AgentCore services (memory, gateway, identity, policy, observability) to an agent already on AWS, Temporal on AWS (migrate/run Temporal workers on AWS, a service orchestrated by Temporal, Temporal Cloud vs self-hosted). Temporal Workflow code is never rewritten into Step Functions. Requires at least one agentic component — a purely non-agent system (plain services, batch jobs, HTTP endpoints, non-agent Temporal Activities) is out of scope, redirected to gcp-to-aws / heroku-to-aws / llm-to-bedrock. Not for: compute/data migration with no AI agent; pure LLM SDK rewrite (use llm-to-bedrock); per-model pricing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate workloads from Microsoft Azure to AWS. Triggers on: migrate from Azure, Azure to AWS, move off Azure, migrate AKS to EKS, migrate App Service or Azure VMs to AWS compute, migrate Azure SQL or Azure Database to RDS, migrate Cosmos DB to DynamoDB, migrate Azure OpenAI to Bedrock, move Azure AI or agentic workloads to AWS, estimate AWS costs for my Azure infrastructure, what-if workshop. Runs a 6-phase process: discover Azure resources from Terraform, the live `az` CLI, app code, and billing exports, then clarify, design, estimate costs, optionally reprice scenarios, generate artifacts, and collect feedback. Clarify gates Design, Estimate, and Generate; Generate is opt-in at the post-Estimate decision gate. Bicep/ARM discovery is not yet implemented; a Bicep/ARM-only workspace halts. Do not use for: GCP migrations (see gcp-to-aws), Heroku migrations (see heroku-to-aws), general AWS architecture advice (see architect-for-startups), AWS-to-Azure reverse migration, or Azure-to-Azure refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate workloads from Heroku to AWS. Triggers on: migrate from Heroku, Heroku to AWS, move off Heroku, migrate Heroku Postgres to RDS, migrate Heroku Redis to ElastiCache, migrate Heroku Kafka to MSK, migrate dynos to Elastic Beanstalk, migrate dynos to Fargate, migrate Heroku Private Space, Heroku to ECS, leave Heroku, what-if workshop, compare migration scenarios, workshop mode. Runs a 6-phase process: discover Heroku resources live via the authenticated Heroku CLI (read-only, consent-gated) and/or from Terraform, Procfile/app.json, and billing exports, then clarify, design, estimate costs, generate artifacts, and collect feedback. Clarify must finish before Design, Estimate, or Generate. An optional post-Estimate what-if workshop reprices region/HA/compute/Graviton scenarios. Do not use for: GCP migrations (see gcp-to-aws), Azure migrations (see azure-to-aws), AWS-to-Heroku reverse migration, general AWS architecture advice without migration intent, or Heroku-to-Heroku refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connects AI agents to remote Windows desktop applications on Amazon WorkSpaces Applications (AppStream 2.0) through the managed Agent Access MCP server, and guides reliable desktop automation. Covers connecting an agent to the MCP endpoint (SigV4, streaming URL, and Active Directory SAML/Domain Join), BLOCKING vs POLLING connect modes, the computer-use tools (screenshot, click, type, key, scroll), screenshot-budget and action-batching discipline, MCP tool forwarding (forwarded___ tools), session lifecycle and expire-on-delete, and troubleshooting connection errors. Use when building or debugging an agent that drives a remote Windows desktop or GUI application via WorkSpaces Applications / AppStream — including "dcv session not ready", "client_disconnected", 400 signing-region, POLLING/connection_status, SAML assertion, or forwarded tool questions. Not for Amazon WorkSpaces Personal/Core virtual desktops or general AppStream fleet administration unrelated to agent access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze AWS costs, find savings, manage budgets, evaluate Savings Plans and Reserved Instances, right-size EC2/Lambda/RDS/EBS with Compute Optimizer, look up service pricing, query CUR with Athena, detect cost anomalies, scope costs to billing views, and monitor Free Tier usage. Triggers on: AWS bill, cost analysis, reduce spend, savings plan, reserved instance, right-size, budget alert, cost optimization, pricing, free tier, cost anomaly, CUR, cost audit, billing view, billing view ARN.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。