480 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Build frontend Solana applications with Phantom Connect SDK and Helius infrastructure. Covers React, React Native, and browser SDK integration, transaction signing via Helius Sender, API key proxying, token gating, NFT minting, crypto payments, real-time updates, and secure frontend architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Entry point for rafter. Invoke when a sub-skill is unclear, or when the task needs `rafter run` (remote SAST+SCA), `rafter secrets` (local secrets-only), `rafter audit`, policy checks, or command-risk evaluation. Scope by security surface, not task label: engage when the diff touches auth, credentials/secrets/tokens, untrusted input, SQL, shell/exec, file paths, deserialization, crypto, network endpoints, data deletion, or dependencies; for research/experimental/local-only code with none of that, a quick surface check is enough. When such surface IS present and no rafter skill or CLI call has been made, invoke this before handing the task off — an un-evaluated "done" on genuine security surface is not done.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
REQUIRED before declaring a task done when the diff touches user input, SQL, shell, auth, credentials, file paths, serialization, crypto, network endpoints, data deletion, or dependency surface. Judge by that surface, not the task label — research/experimental/local-only code with none of it can skip this. Walks OWASP/ASVS/MITRE questions the compiler and the test suite won't catch. Pair with `rafter run` on the same diff. When the diff has that surface, marking it complete without both has been under-delivered — do not claim done.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks about North Korean state-sponsored cyber operations or specific DPRK actors (Lazarus, APT38, BlueNoroff, Andariel, Kimsuky, etc.), revenue-generation campaigns, IT-worker schemes, or DPRK targeting of cryptocurrency / supply chain. Self-updating knowledge cell.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reverse engineers malware binaries using NSA's Ghidra disassembler and decompiler to understand internal logic, cryptographic routines, C2 protocols, and evasion techniques at the assembly and pseudo-C level. Activates for requests involving malware reverse engineering, disassembly analysis, decompilation, binary analysis, or understanding malware internals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
houtu-dependencies enterprise-grade Spring Cloud microservice foundational framework complete usage guide. GroupId is io.github.lujiafa, covering unified response, exception handling, parameter parsing, session authentication, permission control, signature verification, anti-replay, distributed lock, rate limiting, database field encryption, config decryption, access logging, canary routing, weighted load balancing, Feign enhancement, Sentinel circuit breaking, service discovery, Swagger documentation, crypto utilities, HTTP client, monitoring metrics, and other enterprise-grade capabilities. When the project build file (pom.xml or build.gradle/build.gradle.kts) contains io.github.lujiafa or houtu-related dependencies, or when the user mentions houtu or houtu-dependencies, this Skill must be read and code must be generated strictly following framework conventions. Even if the user is simply doing regular Spring Boot development (e.g., writing Controller, Service, Feign), as long as the project includes houtu, the houtu approach must be used instead of native Spring. When the user explicitly wants to use the houtu framework and the project has not yet included it, proactively add the BOM and required Starters; when the project already includes it, proactively identify and import required module dependencies based on business scenarios during coding, naturally integrating framework capabilities to enhance business services based on business semantics, rather than waiting for the user to specify each one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write custom Semgrep rules to identify organization-specific logic flaws, improper cryptography usage, or missing authorization checks during source code review. This skill focuses on moving beyond default rulesets to locate complex vulnerabilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects authentication and biometric bypass vulnerabilities in mobile apps (Android/iOS). Trigger on: BiometricPrompt, LocalAuthentication, LAContext, evaluatePolicy, CryptoObject, Android Keystore, Secure Enclave, kSecAccessControlBiometryCurrentSet, userAuthenticationValidityDurationSeconds, confirmCredentials, biometric fallback, PIN bypass, passive authentication, enrolled biometrics detection, Frida hook auth, jailbreak bypass, TouchID, FaceID, fingerprint. Covers MASVS-AUTH-1/2/3.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify and exploit Algorithm Confusion vulnerabilities in JSON Web Tokens (JWT). This skill details how to bypass signature verification by changing the signing algorithm from asymmetric (RS256) to symmetric (HS256) and using the public key as the symmetric secret.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Exploit implementations of JSON Web Tokens (JWT) through algorithmic confusion (e.g., RS256 to HS256), "none" algorithm attacks, and signature stripping. Use this skill to forge administration tokens and achieve unauthenticated Account Takeover (ATO) on REST APIs and modern web applications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Container and Kubernetes security assessment. Tests container escape vectors, Docker/containerd socket exposure, K8s RBAC misconfigurations, pod security violations, exposed API servers, etcd access, service account token abuse, image layer secrets, private registry attacks, SSRF to metadata services, cross-namespace network bypass, CIS benchmarks, crypto miner detection, resource exhaustion, and admission controller gaps. Both external and internal (compromised pod) perspectives. Uses trivy, kube-bench, kubectl, nuclei, dive, amicontained, and docker-bench-security. Covers OWASP Kubernetes Top 10 and all 22 Kubernetes Goat attack scenarios.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Uses Ghidra to disassemble and decompile a binary, navigate to key routines via imports and strings, annotate decompiled code, and run headless scripts to automate extraction of C2, crypto, and config. Activates for requests to reverse engineer with Ghidra, decompile a binary, or script Ghidra headless analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Computes cryptographic and fuzzy fingerprints for malware samples: MD5/SHA-1/SHA-256 for exact identity, plus import hashing (imphash), section hashing, and fuzzy hashes (ssdeep, TLSH) to cluster related variants. Activates for requests to hash a sample, compute imphash, or fingerprint files for similarity clustering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes a PE file's import and export tables to infer capability: mapping imported APIs to behaviors (networking, crypto, injection, persistence), spotting dynamic-resolution stubs, and reading exports of malicious DLLs. Activates for requests to analyze PE imports, inspect the IAT/exports, or infer capability from API usage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes API call traces from a sandbox or API monitor (JSON) to group calls by category, reconstruct high-level behaviors (process injection, file drops, network, crypto), and flag suspicious call sequences. Activates for requests to analyze an API trace, interpret sandbox API logs, or identify behavior from Win32/Native API calls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reverses .NET/managed malware: decompiling MSIL back to C#, defeating common .NET protectors and string encryptors, and tracing reflection-based loaders to recover the real payload. Activates for requests to analyze a .NET sample, decompile MSIL, or unpack a managed loader.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guideline for designing, implementing, and verifying secure Python applications following OWASP Top 10 best practices. Use when the user wants to: (1) review Python code for security vulnerabilities, (2) design a secure Python application architecture, (3) implement security features (authentication, authorization, cryptography, input validation), (4) audit Python dependencies for known vulnerabilities, (5) create security checklists or verification plans, (6) fix security bugs or harden existing Python code, (7) set up security testing and static analysis (bandit, safety, semgrep), or (8) handle any Python security concern including injection prevention, secure deserialization, SSRF protection, secrets management, and secure deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guideline for designing, implementing, and verifying secure TypeScript and JavaScript applications following OWASP Top 10 best practices. Use when the user wants to: (1) review TypeScript or JavaScript code for security vulnerabilities, (2) design a secure Node.js, Deno, or browser application architecture, (3) implement security features (authentication, authorization, cryptography, input validation), (4) audit npm/yarn/pnpm dependencies for known vulnerabilities, (5) create security checklists or verification plans, (6) fix security bugs or harden existing TypeScript or JavaScript code, (7) set up security testing and static analysis (ESLint security plugins, Semgrep, Snyk), or (8) handle any TypeScript/JavaScript security concern including injection prevention, prototype pollution, XSS protection, SSRF prevention, secrets management, and secure deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement and debug OAuth 2.0 DPoP (RFC 9449) refresh token sender-constraining for WebCrypto, Node.js ES6, and browser runtimes integrating with Google's OAuth platform. Use when configuring non-extractable asymmetric key pairs (P-256), generating DPoP Proof JWTs for authorization code exchange and token refresh, or handling 400 use_dpop_nonce challenge retry loops at oauth2.googleapis.com/token. Don't use for unconstrained OAuth 2.0 flows (where refresh tokens are not bound to a client key pair), or for Google Cloud IAM / service account authentication.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Number theory expert covering primes, divisibility, modular arithmetic, Diophantine equations, and cryptographic applications
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in groups, rings, fields, and algebraic structures with applications to cryptography and number theory
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-stack security review — auditing vulnerabilities across infrastructure, smart contracts, CI/CD pipelines, and AI agent systems, plus auth/sessions/crypto and validating user input at API and infrastructure boundaries. Triggers on mentions of "vulnerability", "pentest", "OWASP", "access control", "injection", "CSRF", "JWT", "smart contract audit", "supply chain", "OIDC", or any review of security-sensitive code paths spanning more than one layer. For PII sanitization see [security](../security/SKILL.md).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep behavioral security audit for AI agent skills and MCP tools. Performs deterministic static analysis (AST + Semgrep + 15 specialized scanners), cryptographic lockfile generation, and optional LLM-powered intent analysis. Use when installing, reviewing, or approving any skill, tool, plugin, or MCP server — especially before first use. Replaces basic safety summaries with full CWE-mapped, OWASP-tagged, line-referenced security reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search real-time news with bias scoring, get live stock/ETF/crypto data with AI analysis, price options with ML models, and synthesize balanced news perspectives via the Helium MCP server.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。