「mock」の検索結果

Test Temporal workflows with pytest, time-skipping, and mocking strategies. Covers unit testing, integration testing, replay testing, and local development setup. Use when implementing Temporal workflow tests or debugging test failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate BATS test structure and fixtures for shell script testing with setup/teardown, assertions, and mocking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test Temporal workflows with pytest, time-skipping, and mocking strategies. Covers unit testing, integration testing, replay testing, and local development setup. Use when implementing Temporal workflow tests or debugging test failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement comprehensive testing strategies with pytest, fixtures, mocking, and test-driven development. Use when writing Python tests, setting up test suites, or implementing testing best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement comprehensive testing strategies using Jest, Vitest, and Testing Library for unit tests, integration tests, and end-to-end testing with mocking, fixtures, and test-driven development. Use when writing JavaScript/TypeScript tests, setting up test infrastructure, or implementing TDD/BDD workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a reference image, screenshot, or mockup into token-driven, accessible code — infer the design system from the reference (palette, type scale, spacing, radius, layout archetype), map it to the 3-tier tokens, rebuild it, then verify with the kit's gates. Use when the user provides a design/screenshot and wants matching UI code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies proven testing patterns — Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA), Given-When-Then, Test Data Builders, Object Mother, parameterized tests, fixtures, spies, and test doubles — to help write maintainable, reliable, and readable test suites. Use when the user asks about writing unit tests, integration tests, or end-to-end tests; structuring test cases or test suites; applying TDD or BDD practices; working with mocks, stubs, spies, or fakes; improving test coverage or reducing flakiness; or needs guidance on test organization, naming conventions, or assertions in frameworks like Jest, Vitest, pytest, or similar.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract design systems from reference UI images and generate implementation-ready UI design prompts. Use when users provide UI screenshots/mockups and want to create consistent designs, generate design systems, or build MVP UIs matching reference aesthetics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, improve, and review interfaces for websites, apps, dashboards, and components: explore distinct design directions, compare styles side by side, and refine visual hierarchy against real screenshots. Delivers comparison pages, design notes, mockups, or working interfaces. Use for new interface design, style comparison, visual polish, screenshot recreation, or interface review. Not for business logic, APIs, builds, or code cleanup without visible UI changes. If oil-ui-pro is installed, use oil-ui-pro instead. 设计、改进和评审网站、App、后台与组件的界面，完成设计方向探索、多风格同屏比较、视觉层级和基于实际画面的迭代；按请求交付对比页、设计说明、设计稿或可运行界面。当用户需要新界面设计、比较不同设计风格、视觉精修、截图还原或界面评审时使用。只负责设计判断，组件归属、数据流、状态正确性和测试等代码实现质量不在范围内。不用于纯业务逻辑、接口、构建部署、无界面行为变化的代码整理、单独绘制普通插画或操作现有网站。已安装 oil-ui-pro 时交给 oil-ui-pro。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare for recruitment at a Chinese state-owned enterprise (国企 / 央企), including its written test and interview: what these employers assess, the typical stages, answers that show fit and stability, and the questions to ask about the role. Use when asked 国企面试怎么准备, 央企校招, 国企笔试考什么, 国企和互联网怎么选, 国企面试问题, or prepare for a state-owned enterprise interview in China. Produces a stage map to confirm against the recruitment notice, a written-test preparation plan, a question bank with answer points, a mock interview with feedback, and a comparison with private-sector offers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked 质量追溯体系怎么建, 产品追溯方案, 批次追溯, 一物一码, 客户要求可追溯性, 召回演练, 正向追溯和反向追溯, or plan product and batch traceability in a Chinese factory. Produces a traceability plan in Chinese: the trace unit and coding rule, the data to capture at each process step (material lots, work orders, equipment, people, inspection results), forward and backward trace paths, record retention, a mock recall drill with a target time, gaps against the current system, and a phased rollout, with industry rules (food, medical devices, automotive) marked to confirm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare a promotion defence (晋升答辩) for a level-based promotion process common at Chinese technology companies: the materials, the presentation structure, the evidence for the next level, and a rehearsal of the committee's questions. Use when asked 帮我准备晋升答辩, 晋升述职, 晋升 PPT, how do I prepare for my promotion committee, or 答辩问题. Produces a level-gap analysis against the target level's criteria, the defence presentation outline in Chinese, a timed talk track, and a question bank with answer points, then a mock committee round.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

**WORKFLOW SKILL** - Evaluate AI agent skills using structured benchmarks with YAML specs, fixture isolation, and pluggable validators. USE FOR: run waza, waza help, run eval, run benchmark, evaluate skill, test agent, generate eval suite, init eval, compare results, score agent, agent evaluation, skill testing, cross-model comparison. DO NOT USE FOR: improving skill frontmatter (use waza dev), creating new skills from scratch (use skill-creator), token counting or budget checks (use waza tokens). INVOKES: Copilot SDK executor, mock engine, code/regex validators. FOR SINGLE OPERATIONS: use waza run directly for a single benchmark.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users build functional product prototypes from natural language or visual mocks using AI coding tools. This skill enables product leaders to bypass engineering bottlenecks and validate ideas through hands-on building.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral guardrails for Codex coding work based on common user complaints. Use when Codex is asked to implement, modify, debug, review, test, or operate on a codebase and should avoid unsafe scope expansion, stale edits, fake completion, brittle edits, shallow debugging, superficial patch-on fixes, one-off special-case code, short-term design choices that hurt maintainability, blindly following incorrect user assumptions, poor dependency choices, generic product or UI output, over-mocked tests, noisy approvals, verbose status reports, or leaking internal reasoning into project artifacts or user-facing UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write integration tests using TestContainers for .NET with xUnit. Covers infrastructure testing with real databases, message queues, and caches in Docker containers instead of mocks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Three modes for CS-conference papers (CVPR/ICCV/ECCV vision, ACL/EMNLP/NAACL NLP, ICLR/NeurIPS/ICML/AAAI ML). DIRECT-EDIT mode (common): the user describes a change in Chinese or English and the manuscript (LaTeX or Markdown) is edited directly through a CS-venue writing toolkit with author sign-off (use for 改这段 / 把中文想法写成 latex / polish / de-AI / translate / compress a passage). REVIEW mode (occasional, pre-submission): harden the paper through an adversarial courtroom review engine (N holistic domain reviewers / contestability routing / two-sided trial / three-way verdict / clerk-converged multi-round loop) with consensus-gated, author-signed revisions (use for review / critique / 审稿 / 评审 / mock-review). AUTO mode (unattended, opt-in via /goal): run the review-revise loop toward a verifiable goal, applying safe fixes under a drift-bounded policy and queueing risky ones. Resolves all inputs at runtime, no hardcoded paths. Not a from-scratch drafter (use ml-paper-writing) and not an official-venue rebuttal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-driven development for behaviour a unit test cannot reach, by writing the expectation against the running app before writing the code. Declare the consequence first, watch it fail, implement, watch it pass. Use when building a user-facing feature, when the user asks for TDD on UI or full-stack work, when a unit test cannot express the outcome that matters, or when you want a red-green loop that runs against the real app instead of mocks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find out why the tests pass but the app is broken. Catches false greens: a green suite over a feature that does not work, a mocked API standing in for a real one, an assertion that holds no matter what the app does, a click handler wired to nothing. Use when the suite is green and the user says it is broken, when a test never fails, when coverage looks fine but bugs still ship, or before trusting a passing run you did not watch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes and migrates Swift Testing framework tests with @Test, @Suite, #expect, #require, confirmation, traits, withKnownIssue, Attachment.record, processExitsWith exit tests and capture lists, Test.cancel, Issue.record warnings/manual failures, XCTest-to-Swift Testing migration, Xcode 27 interoperability modes, XCUITest UI-test boundaries, performance/snapshot boundaries, mocking, async patterns, and test organization. Use when writing tests, converting XCTest assertions such as XCTUnwrap or XCTFail, reviewing advanced Swift Testing API availability, or deciding when to keep XCTest/XCUITest.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes turn-level tests for a LiveKit agent in the user's normal test suite: pytest (Python) or Vitest (Node.js). Use when the user asks to "write tests for my agent", "add a test for this tool", "test the handoff", "pin this bug", "why does my agent test fail", or after building or changing agent behavior that needs regression coverage. Covers the SDK's test session harness, assertions on messages, tool calls and handoffs, LLM judging of a reply against an intent, mocking tools, multi-turn tests, and judging whole conversations with the built-in judges. For interactive poking use debugging-livekit-agents. For grading whole conversations at scale use running-livekit-simulations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

POD integration — Printful, Printify, mockups, niche selection, margin optimization

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up Vitest testing in any project — detects type (Cloudflare Workers, React, Node, library), generates vitest.config.ts, test setup, utilities, and a sample test. Covers mocking patterns, coverage config, workspace setup, Jest migration. Use whenever the user mentions adding tests, setting up Vitest, configuring tests, migrating from Jest, fixing testing infrastructure, or asks 'how do I test this'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building a visual identity or brand kit with Scenario: a logo, wordmark, or icon as editable SVG, a color palette and typography spec, logo variants (mono, reversed, favicon), and brand applications like social templates, avatars, banners, or merchandise mockups. Also for a rebrand or refreshing an existing mark. Keywords: brandkit, brand kit, visual identity, logo, monogram, wordmark, SVG, vectorize, color palette, typography, brand guidelines, brand board, launch kit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。