「reporting」の検索結果

Expert TSA cybersecurity compliance advisor for critical infrastructure owners and operators. Use this skill whenever a user asks about TSA Security Directives for pipelines, freight railroads, passenger rail, public transit, or bus operators; the TSA Cyber Risk Management Program (CRMP); Cybersecurity Implementation Plan (CIP); Cybersecurity Operational Implementation Plan (COIP); Cybersecurity Assessment Plan (CAP); incident reporting to CISA; designation of a Cybersecurity Coordinator; Critical Cyber Systems (CCS); OT/IT network segmentation; the TSA November 2024 NPRM; or any directive in the SD Pipeline-2021 series, SD 1580-21-01 (freight rail), or SD 1582-21-01 (public transit/passenger rail). Also trigger for questions like "are we covered by TSA directives?", "what does the TSA require for pipeline cybersecurity?", "how do I build a CIP?", "what must I report to CISA?", or any request involving transportation critical infrastructure cybersecurity compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft matter status reports from emails, call notes, and updates. Internal and client-facing formats, RAG logic, variance commentary, escalation flags. Use when asked to draft a status report, write a project update, summarise matter progress, prepare a client report, create a weekly or monthly update, convert emails into a status summary, or produce any kind of matter reporting. Also triggers when the user pastes email threads and asks what the status is, or needs to turn internal updates into client-facing reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess, report, and manage serious incidents involving high-risk AI systems under Article 73 EU AI Act. Covers incident qualification, deadline buckets (2/10/15 days), authority notification, deployer duties (Art. 26(5)), cross-regulation mapping (GDPR/NIS2/MDR), corrective measures, and DACH-specific routing. Use when asked to evaluate whether an AI incident is reportable, draft an Article 73 notification, identify the right authority, or build an AI incident response process.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert agreed scope into a structured matter plan — phases, workstreams, milestones, dependencies, owner assignments, and matter setup decisions. Use when planning a new matter, running a kickoff, building a workstream plan, structuring phases, setting up task codes, or producing a plan to drive status reporting. Trigger on: 'build a plan', 'matter plan', 'project plan', 'what are the phases', 'workstream plan', 'how do we sequence this', 'who owns what', 'task codes', 'matter setup', 'workstream plan', 'matter plan', 'rolling wave', 'plan the next phase', 'what comes first', 'kickoff agenda'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

NIS2 Compliance Navigator — scope classification, Art. 21 gap analysis (0-4 maturity scoring), and compliance roadmap under EU Directive 2022/2555 with deep German BSIG-neu coverage and profiles for Italy, France, Netherlands, Austria, Spain. Use when: (1) User mentions "NIS2", "NIS-2", "BSIG", "BSIG-neu", "NIS2UmsuCG", "Cyberbeveiligingswet", "Loi Résilience", "NISG", "decreto legislativo 138", (2) User asks if their organization falls under NIS2 or needs a cybersecurity compliance assessment, (3) User mentions essential/important entities, Annex I/II, BSI registration, § 30 BSIG, incident reporting, management body liability, supply chain security, (4) User wants a NIS2 gap analysis, readiness assessment, or compliance roadmap, (5) User asks about NIS2 fines, enforcement, or Nachweispflicht, (6) User asks about NIS2 in any EU Member State.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) compliance advisor for essential and important entities: entity classification, Art. 21 risk management measures, Art. 23 incident reporting timelines (24h/72h/1 month), Art. 20 governance obligations, supply chain security (Art. 21(2)(d); coordinated risk assessments Art. 22), gap assessments, policy drafting, ISO 27001 alignment, and penalty exposure analysis. Also covers Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, the technical/methodological sub-requirements for Art. 21(2) and the significant-incident thresholds binding on DNS/cloud/data-centre/MSP/MSSP/trust-service and other digital entities. Use for NIS2 readiness, transposition questions, ENISA technical implementation guidance, significant-incident thresholds, supervisory differences between essential and important entities, and cross-border coordination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Firm-matter matching, matter instruction drafting, firm onboarding checklist, and instruction audit for in-house legal ops teams. Match a new matter to the right panel firm by practice area, jurisdiction, complexity, and cost tier. Produce a structured matter instruction with scope, timeline, budget, staffing, and reporting requirements. Generate an onboarding checklist covering conflict clearance, engagement letter, OCG acknowledgment, e-billing setup, and platform access. Audit an existing instruction for completeness and produce a remediation note. Trigger on: 'which firm should handle this', 'instruct the firm', 'write the instruction', 'matter instruction template', 'onboard the firm', 'set up the matter', 'conflict check', 'e-billing setup', 'is our instruction complete', 'review our instruction', 'instruction gap', 'allocate this matter'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route selection, CE marking, SBOM requirements, vulnerability and incident reporting to ENISA/CSIRTs, support period obligations, and manufacturer/importer/distributor duties. Trigger for EU CRA, Cyber Resilience Act, PDE compliance, Annex I requirements, SBOM EU, CE marking cybersecurity, or connected product security EU.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU AI Act Knowledge Engine — authoritative regulatory Q&A grounded in 70 official EU source documents (including the 2026 Commission draft guidelines on Art. 6 high-risk classification — general principles, Annex I, Annex III). Answers any question about the AI Act with article-level citations from the full regulation text, Commission guidelines, EDPB/EDPS opinions, codes of practice, harmonised standards, FRIA guides, incident templates, and sector-specific guidance. This skill should be used when the user asks about the "EU AI Act", "AI Act regulation", "Regulation 2024/1689", "KI-Verordnung", asks to "explain an AI Act article", "what does Article X say", "AI Act requirements", "AI Act penalties", "AI Act timeline", "GPAI obligations", "high-risk AI", "prohibited AI practices", "AI Act and GDPR", "fundamental rights impact assessment", "AI Act standards", "AI Act national implementation", "AI literacy", "serious incident reporting", "Digital Omnibus", "AI regulatory sandbox", or any question about EU artificial intelligence regulation. Also triggers on German terms: "KI-Gesetz", "KI-Verordnung", "Hochrisiko-KI", "KI-Kompetenz", "Grundrechte-Folgenabschaetzung", "GPAI-Verhaltenskodex". For assessment workflows that produce a classification decision rather than a knowledge answer, offer to run a structured risk-tier classification in-session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collaboration platform configuration methodology for legal matter sites. Site architecture, workflow identification, dashboard design, data quality governance, and user adoption for SharePoint, Teams, and equivalent platforms. M365 is the reference implementation — outputs are platform-agnostic enough to brief IT or build simple automations without becoming a Power Automate manual. Use when setting up a matter site, identifying workflows to automate, designing reporting dashboards, managing platform data quality, or driving user adoption. Trigger on: 'set up the matter site', 'configure SharePoint', 'build a dashboard', 'what should we automate', 'brief IT on this workflow', 'nobody is using the platform', 'data quality is poor', 'set up Teams channel', 'matter site structure', 'alerts and notifications', 'user training', 'platform governance', 'status dashboard', 'what workflows can we automate', 'matter site template'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user asks what the EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) means for their product, whether and when they must report a vulnerability or incident, or what a specific CVE triggers legally. Maps a product with digital elements to CRA scope, product classification, Annex I vulnerability-handling duties, and Article 14 reporting obligations — every legal claim cited from official regulation text fetched live through the Ansvar Gateway MCP connector, joined with live CVE / CISA-KEV / EPSS vulnerability intelligence from the same connector.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When a solution seems impossible and the path forward is blocked. Refuses to take no for an answer: classifies what kind of "no" you hit, then runs lateral-thinking techniques (assumption autopsy, inversion, first principles, constraint toggling, analogical transfer, and more) until the wall cracks or is proven load-bearing. Generates at least 10 angles before evaluating any. AGENTS: use this on yourself when an API doesn't support what you need, an approach has failed twice, or a "that's not possible" sentence is forming — run the fast path BEFORE reporting a dead end. Archives walls to ~/.config/makerskills/unstuck/archive/. Sits upstream of decide. Triggers on "/unstuck," "I'm stuck," "this seems impossible," "we hit a wall," "there's no way to," "they said no," "dead end," "out of options," "I've tried everything," "work around this."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate client-facing performance reports for Chinese wealth management clients. Adapted from the original client-report skill for A-share portfolios, Chinese regulatory requirements, and local reporting conventions. Triggers on "A股客户报告", "客户持仓报告", "client report China", "wealth report A-share", "客户业绩报告", or "portfolio report for [client]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write variance commentary for A-share fund performance and portfolio changes. Adapts the original variance-commentary skill for fund accounting and Chinese fund reporting conventions. Triggers on "基金业绩点评", "组合表现分析", "variance commentary fund", "基金表现分析", "业绩归因", or "commentary on [fund] performance".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Roll forward A-share financial models for new periods. Adapts the original roll-forward skill for Chinese financial statements, CAS conventions, and A-share reporting calendars. Triggers on "A股模型滚动", "模型更新", "roll forward model China", "roll forward", "更新财务模型", or "project [company] [period]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates protocol-based error/crash monitoring with swappable providers (Sentry, Crashlytics). Use when user wants to add crash reporting, error tracking, or production monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate affiliate performance reports with KPIs and recommendations. Triggers on: "show my affiliate report", "how are my programs doing", "performance review", "earnings report", "monthly affiliate report", "weekly report", "analyze my affiliate earnings", "which program is best", "EPC report", "conversion rate analysis", "revenue breakdown", "campaign performance".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing crash reporting, capturing fatal/non-fatal errors, recording isolate/async exceptions, customizing reports, or uploading obfuscated symbols.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs B2B pipeline work — ICP and account lists, prospecting, cold email and LinkedIn outbound sequences, lead scoring, MQL to SQL handoff, sales decks, objection handling, demo scripts, CRM pipeline hygiene, and RevOps reporting. Trigger on 'find leads', 'prospect list', 'cold email sequence', 'outbound campaign', 'lead scoring model', 'our pipeline is empty', 'sales deck for enterprise buyers'. Also use when the user has a strong product and no route to the companies that need it. Not for — consumer lifecycle email, see `14-email-marketing-global`; the offer being sold, see `31-offer-design-global`; positioning against rivals, see `58-positioning-global`; inbound content, see `36-content-brief-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cyber threat intelligence and OSINT analysis toolkit. Runs structured investigations and delivers analyst-grade intelligence products with sourced, trust-scored findings. Use for OSINT and CTI cases, digital-footprint and exposure review, domain/subdomain/DNS/certificate recon, web-infrastructure pivoting (favicon hashes, tracker IDs, TLS certs, phishing-kit fingerprinting, campaign clustering), username/email/phone enumeration, breach and infostealer-log triage, image forensics, geolocation, crypto-wallet and IBAN/bank-account tracing, darknet search, M365/Azure and SaaS tenant recon, China/Sinophone recon (ICP filings, PRC corporate registries, Baidu/FOFA/Quake/ZoomEye), vulnerability and ransomware lookup, threat modeling, PII redaction, and structured reporting. Commands include /case, /sweep, /query, /webpivot, /username, /phone, /email-deep, /breach-deep, /icp, /cn-corp, /iban, /stealer-log, /exposure, /threat-model, /report, /brief, /redact, /apikeys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Toolkit for styling artifacts with a theme. These artifacts can be slides, docs, reportings, HTML landing pages, etc. There are 10 pre-set themes with colors/fonts that you can apply to any artifact that has been creating, or can generate a new theme on-the-fly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define the delivery metrics contract for agent-assisted SDLC — DORA four plus per-stage indicators derived from artifact and git history, and the control bands that turn metric drift into a routed intake. Use when reporting cycle time, plan adherence, or defining response thresholds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn one confirmed security finding into a disclosure-ready GitHub advisory with root cause, proof of concept, impact, and source evidence. Use for reporting an established vulnerability, not discovering or validating one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。