4,028 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Specialized skill for building production-ready serverless applications on AWS. Covers Lambda functions, API Gateway, DynamoDB, SQS/SNS event-driven patterns, SAM/CDK deployment, and cold start optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured guide for setting up A/B tests with mandatory gates for hypothesis, metrics, and execution readiness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate autonomous AI development pipelines through your Kanban board (Asana, GitHub Projects, Linear). Manages multi-worker Claude Code dispatch, deterministic quality gates, adversarial review, per-task cost tracking, and crash-proof pipeline execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit local AI coding-agent sessions with agenttrace for cost, tool failures, latency, anomalies, health, diffs, and CI gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
investigation-scout と investigation-diver による2フェーズ調査。 不具合の原因調査やコード探索など、未知の領域を掘り下げたいときに使う。 scout が候補を広く洗い出し、diver が高優先の候補を深掘りする。
Cascade merge changes through a chain of dependent branches. Use when updating stacked/chained PRs, propagating changes from a parent branch to all downstream branches, or when the user mentions "cascade merge", "propagate changes", "update dependent branches", or "merge to downstream branches".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Targeted deep research to fill a specific gap in an existing thesis. Use when user says "deepen", "flesh out", "expand on", "fill in", or specifies a thesis section to improve. Also supports --sync-metrics mode — detects stale financial metrics across every in-scope analytical section of a thesis (not just Key Metrics or Summary) and coherently updates every sentence that depends on them, using a Key-Metrics-table / FMP / web-search waterfall. Use when user says "sync metrics", "update the numbers throughout the note", or "fix stale figures across the whole thesis". The batch form `--sync-metrics --all-flagged` syncs every thesis flagged by the latest `$numbers --all-open` in one operation — detection fanned out to capped READ-ONLY agents, one consolidated confirmation gate, direct sequential writes (agents never write).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Propagate a hypothetical macro scenario through the entire portfolio. Use when user says "what if", "scenario", "what happens to my portfolio if", or describes a macro event to model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refresh the Key Metrics table in a thesis with current data from Financial Modeling Prep, with a scoped web-search fallback (Step 4b) when FMP has no data or resolved the wrong company. Use when user says "numbers", "refresh metrics", "update key metrics", or "refresh [TICKER]" with no other action implied. Surgical edit only — does NOT create research notes or propagate via $sync. Also flags (never auto-edits) stale price/valuation framing in the thesis Summary — see Step 10b.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Targeted deep research to fill a specific gap in an existing thesis. Use when user says "deepen", "flesh out", "expand on", "fill in", or specifies a thesis section to improve. Also supports --sync-metrics mode — detects stale financial metrics across every in-scope analytical section of a thesis (not just Key Metrics or Summary) and coherently updates every sentence that depends on them, using a Key-Metrics-table / FMP / web-search waterfall. Use when user says "sync metrics", "update the numbers throughout the note", or "fix stale figures across the whole thesis". The batch form `--sync-metrics --all-flagged` syncs every thesis flagged by the latest `/numbers --all-open` in one operation — detection fanned out to capped READ-ONLY agents, one consolidated confirmation gate, direct sequential writes (agents never write).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refresh the Key Metrics table in a thesis with current data from Financial Modeling Prep, with a Quartr standardized-statement tie-break for Revenue Growth / Gross Margin gaps (Step 4b-Q) and a scoped web-search fallback (Step 4b) when FMP has no data or resolved the wrong company. Use when user says "numbers", "refresh metrics", "update key metrics", or "refresh [TICKER]" with no other action implied. Surgical edit only — does NOT create research notes or propagate via /sync. Also flags (never auto-edits) stale price/valuation framing in the thesis Summary — see Step 10b.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synchronize recent research learnings across all affected theses, sector notes, and macro documents. Use after a research session or when user says "sync", "propagate", or "update everything".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate implementation failures using root-cause-first debugging. Use when an implementer is blocked, verification fails, or repeated remediation does not converge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conversational AI-first interface with minimal controls, clear outcomes, and delegated task flows for agentic workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, revise, or resolve applicability for SDD Composy user stories (US/SC) from an approved PRD and domain evidence, stopping at the human gate. Use after the PRD is approved — 'gerar as histórias de usuário', 'cenários de aceite', 'stories for prd-SLUG', 'is stories NOT_APPLICABLE here'. Do NOT use before the PRD is approved, for the TechSpec, or for user-story writing outside SDD.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or revise the problem-first SDD Composy PRD (tasks/prd-SLUG/prd.md) with stable RF/CA identifiers, stopping at the human approval gate. Use when a user problem needs a product contract — 'criar o PRD', 'documento de requisitos', 'revisar o PRD do slug X', 'write the requirements for…'. Do NOT use for user stories (sdd-stories), technical design (sdd-techspec), or PRDs outside an initialized SDD workspace.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial verification of one SDD Composy task in verify_required: reproduce every claim with fresh commands, build the truth table, refute stale evidence, and produce the verdict that gates complete. Use when review is done and the task claims to be finished — 'verificar a TASK-003', 'a task está pronta mesmo?', 'is this task really complete'. Do NOT use for QA, code review, or a general 'verify my work' outside an SDD task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or revise the SDD Composy technical specification (tasks/prd-SLUG/techspec.md) from the approved PRD, resolved stories, and mapped codebase, with DEC/RISK and TU/TI/E2E traceability and a human gate. Use when the product contracts are approved and architecture is needed — 'criar a spec técnica', 'techspec do prd-SLUG', 'design the solution for…'. Do NOT use to change product scope, before PRD and stories approval, or for design notes outside SDD.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design deterministic CI quality gates that read the normalized manifest verdict independently from report-export process status.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an approved PRD must become an executable roadmap — 'gerar roadmap do PRD', 'quebrar o PRD em épicos e features', 'cadeia de dependências', 'roadmap with dependencies' — Phase/Epic/Feature/Task with explicit dependencies, waves and critical path, validated by a deterministic checker, with an approval gate. Do NOT use for a PRD that is not approved (prd- create/prd-refine first).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants a new Product Requirements Document — 'criar um PRD', 'escrever os requisitos de', 'new PRD for', 'documento de requisitos' — through a 12-step interview, one question at a time, ending with an approval gate. Do NOT use to change an existing PRD (prd- refine) or to plan implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a code diff or explicit file set through independent correctness and QA lenses. Use when the user asks for a code review, test-coverage assessment, pre-merge audit, or review gate in a PWDEV Flow workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarially verify an implementation against its objective, acceptance criteria, definition of done, and prohibitions using fresh evidence. Use for completion gates, release readiness, or independent verification after implementation and review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。