「aims」の検索結果

Verify sources, claims, images, video, documents, interviews, and synthetic media with SIFT and a durable evidence trail. Use before relying on uncertain material.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, organize, name, edit, or review Enterprise developer documentation, specifications, and technical instructions; ground claims in current source and finish with a plain-language cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when doing ANY task involving Supabase. Triggers: Supabase products (Database, Auth, Edge Functions, Realtime, Storage, Vectors, Cron, Queues); client libraries and SSR integrations (supabase-js, @supabase/ssr) in Next.js, React, SvelteKit, Astro, Remix; auth issues (login, logout, sessions, JWT, cookies, getSession, getUser, getClaims, RLS); Supabase CLI or MCP server; schema changes, migrations, declarative schemas, security audits, Postgres extensions (pg_graphql, pg_cron, pg_vector); debugging and troubleshooting errors or unexpected behavior on Supabase projects (HTTP errors, Postgres errors, RLS surprises, permission denied, schema cache issues, timeouts, Edge Function crashes, Realtime drops, Storage failures) and reading or querying logs (Logs Explorer, ClickHouse).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Access USPTO patent data via PatentsView REST API and Google Patents Public Data (BigQuery). Search by inventor, assignee, CPC, or keywords; download metadata and claims; analyze portfolios; track tech trends. For IP landscape analysis, competitor monitoring, prior art search, and tech forecasting in life sciences and biotech.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check, clean, verify, and improve IEEE citations, references, BibTeX entries, citation positioning, related-work logic, DOI metadata, venue names, and reference formatting using routed citation and metadata guidance. Use when preparing IEEE manuscripts, fixing bibliography errors, verifying reference completeness, improving related work, checking whether citations support claims, or identifying missing classic/recent baselines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to claim a result, effect, significance, or that an analysis reproduces, before reporting or writing it up - requires running the analysis fresh and reading the actual output first; evidence before claims always

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze construction schedule delays for claims and recovery. Perform time impact analysis, identify delay causes, calculate damages, and document for disputes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track and manage construction warranties. Monitor expiration dates, claims, and manufacturer documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies anti-sycophancy checklist to override agreement bias. Use when analyzing contested claims or avoiding socially convenient but inaccurate conclusions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aggregate and analyze customer reviews from G2, Capterra, Trustpilot, App Store, and other platforms. Performs sentiment analysis, identifies pain points, extracts feature feedback, generates marketing claims, and compares competitor reviews. Use when users need review analysis, competitive intelligence, or customer feedback insights.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HTTP request smuggling / desync hunting - CL.TE, TE.CL, TE.TE, CL.0, and HTTP/2 downgrade. Timing-based detection, differential confirmation, no-blind-claims. Wiki-first, FIND schema output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a developer value proposition that is specific, provable, and free of puffery. Use when the messaging leans on "powerful," "better," "seamless," or "best-in-class," when claims have no proof, or when the same line is supposed to reach both the developer and the buyer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Position an AI product when everyone claims AI and skeptics call it "just a wrapper." Find the real wedge (data, workflow, trust, domain), make reliability the differentiator, answer "won't the big labs just build this," and stop leading with "AI-powered." Use when your AI or dev tool blends into a sea of similar demos, buyers doubt the accuracy, or you can't say why you win when the model is a commodity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

从传播心理和受众感受检查成稿是否真正有共鸣，定位受众不明确、主张过多、立场漂移和分享动机不足等问题。用户担心内容不打动人、没流量，或发布前想检查共鸣结构时使用。 English: Review a finished draft for audience resonance and communication psychology, identifying vague audiences, too many claims, shifting positions, and weak sharing motives. Use when content may not connect, may underperform, or needs a pre-publish resonance check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an agent, harness, gateway, MCP workflow, or multi-step automation claims completion and the available traces, checkpoints, approvals, tool calls, or deployment records must be judged without trusting self-reported success.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before responding to pressure for agreement, manufactured urgency, authority appeals, or requests to certify unsupported claims; separate evidence from persuasion and state uncertainty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when configuring Spring Boot as an OAuth2 resource server, validating JWTs from an external auth provider (Keycloak, Auth0, Okta, Cognito), extracting claims, or implementing scope-based authorization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review PRD.md for gaps, contradictions and unverifiable claims, write an improved PRD.md and record the findings in PRD-REVIEW.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check agent-produced plans, tests, or code against the owner's actual intent. Find missing meaning, unrequested work, stale truth, unreachable decisions, unsupported completion claims, and implementation debt. Use before approval or merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when users provide YouTube, Bilibili, or X/Twitter lecture URLs and want reader-first Chinese LaTeX/PDF notes with source-faithful claims, fluent authored prose, and verified teaching figures, especially requests phrased as lecture notes, 视频转PDF, 课程笔记, 讲义, YouTube笔记, B站笔记, X/Twitter lecture notes, or BV号; do not produce transcript dumps, quota-padded prose, or screenshot galleries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Athenahealth integration. Manage Patients, Appointments, Providers, Practices, Departments, Claims. Use when the user wants to interact with Athenahealth data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize document text and identify its main claims, evidence, and unanswered questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use database cache when external APIs aren't reliably idempotent. Use when: (1) External API claims idempotency but returns different values for same input, (2) Re-running a script creates duplicate resources, (3) Need stable identifiers across runs but external service generates new ones. Pattern: check database cache first, only call external API for genuinely new items, cache the result.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。