「completion」の検索結果

Use before EZ_math_model declares quality_audit, packaging, or final delivery complete, especially when pass/fail claims must be backed by files, commands, counts, or concrete evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, structure, or improve form interfaces for clarity, completion rates, and user confidence. Use when the user asks to build a form, redesign a form flow, improve form conversion, add multi-step forms, fix form UX, or structure field layouts and validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Claude Code in autonomous iteration loops until task completion — PRD-based feature development, test coverage improvement, lint fixing, documentation generation, dataset creation, or framework migrations. Uses in-session loop mechanism with specialized templates. Triggers on autonomous loop, iterate until done, run until passing, keep going until, ralph, PRD execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing kernel spinlocks versus mutexes, using RCU, seqlocks, completions, or memory barriers, or debugging scheduling-while-atomic. Not for userspace atomics: use concurrency-debugging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when configuring DMA channels, circular buffer mode, double buffering, memory-to-peripheral transfers, or DMA IRQ completion on bare-metal MCUs. Not for cache theory: use cpu-cache-opt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task, feature, or fix is called done, complete, finished, or fixed, or before a commit, PR, or next task. Not for fact-checking: use verify-both-ways. Not for measuring: use verify-this.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Freeze one eligible Proto UI autonomous-maintenance candidate into a bounded mission packet and lease. Use before observation when a current request or governed queue supplies scope, oracle, baseline, capability, risk, budget, completion, and stop conditions. Do not observe, verify, repair, or invent a mission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independently review one Proto UI autonomous-maintenance remediation in a fresh read-only context. Use after pui-remediate produces a packet and actual diff. Classify technical-completion eligibility without making product or integration decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute implementation tasks from the current plan. Works through tasks sequentially, marks completion, and preserves progress for continuation across sessions. Use when user says "implement", "start coding", "execute plan", or "continue implementation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify task completion by demonstrating real value: run the new code on real data, show visible results, find gaps between plan and reality. Not about tests/builds — about proving the feature WORKS end-to-end.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute implementation tasks from the current plan. Works through tasks sequentially, marks completion, and preserves progress for continuation across sessions. Use when user says "implement", "start coding", "execute plan", or "continue implementation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide advance directive completion. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with advance-directive-guide related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing delays that must survive process restarts (e.g., 24-hour cart abandonment, scheduled follow-ups), waiting for human approval or external events with timeouts (review gates, webhook callbacks, async API completion), polling external services without losing state on crashes, calling other functions and awaiting their results, memoizing expensive operations so they don't re-run on retry, or running async work in parallel inside a workflow. Covers Inngest step methods: step.run, step.sleep, step.waitForEvent, step.waitForSignal, step.sendEvent, step.invoke, step.ai, plus patterns for loops and parallel execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews integration completeness including design-implementation consistency, review/test coverage, and completion criteria. Use when performing integration review in Construction Phase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check and process messages from autonomous AILANG agents. Use when starting a session, after agent handoffs, or when checking for completion notifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze context and decide on continuation via Stop hook. Use when determining if work should continue, analyzing completion status, making continuation decisions, or implementing the Two-Claude pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Land a PR by monitoring conflicts, resolving them, waiting for checks, and squash-merging when green; use when asked to land, merge, or shepherd a PR to completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task spans multiple steps, files, or unknowns — before planning the order of work, whenever about to report completion or success in any wording, and when picking the next action after a result, failure, or surprise. Also under deadline pressure, or when resuming work built on questionable foundations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes comprehensive red team exercises that simulate real-world adversary operations against an organization's people, processes, and technology. The red team operates with stealth as a primary objective, employing the full attack lifecycle from initial reconnaissance through objective completion while testing the organization's detection and response capabilities. This differs from penetration testing by focusing on adversary emulation rather than vulnerability identification. Activates for requests involving red team exercise, adversary simulation, adversary emulation, or full-scope offensive security assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。