Inspect repository session replay and verify configured MetaHarness field memory boundaries before reusing outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
523 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Inspect repository session replay and verify configured MetaHarness field memory boundaries before reusing outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect repository session replay and verify configured MetaHarness field memory boundaries before reusing outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for parser differentials, HTTP normalization gaps, ambiguous headers, path decoding drift, transfer-framing mismatches, and request smuggling routes. Use when the user asks to trace proxy and backend parse differences, conflicting path normalization, Host or forwarded-header ambiguity, CL/TE issues, or routing outcomes that differ across hops. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Customer discovery framework using Jobs-To-Be-Done theory — uncover the functional, social, and emotional jobs customers hire products to do. Produces JTBD canvases with job statements, outcome metrics, and competing solutions. Use alongside cm-brainstorm-idea for evidence-based product decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect repository session replay and verify configured MetaHarness field memory boundaries before reusing outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strategic Customer Success leadership guidance for CS org design, customer segmentation and tiering (tech touch, low touch, high touch), success metrics and KPIs (NRR, GRR, NPS, CSAT, CES), playbook development, executive stakeholder management, CS technology stack strategy, value realization frameworks, and customer journey mapping. Use when building CS teams, defining customer segments, designing playbooks, measuring success outcomes, or implementing CS platforms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The Mileva Method (CRISP) — Phase 3: Investigate. Process mapping for existing or greenfield processes, user journey mapping, UX discovery, project goals, system architecture (integration map + data flow). Use after outcome alignment. Triggers on "investigate", "phase 3", "map the process", "process mapping", "user journey", "as-is process", or after Phase R exit checklist is complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The Mileva Method (CRISP) — Phase 2: Results. Outcome alignment, stakeholder register, baseline measurement, success metrics, tradeoff negotiation. Use after problem definition is complete. Triggers on "results", "phase 2", "define success", "success metrics", "what does done look like", or after Phase C exit checklist is complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research, implement, modify, and audit behavior inside Bricks Builder sites using the bundled Bricks Academy corpus, stable development workflows, and version-aware verification against an authorized active Bricks installation. Use when the requested outcome concerns Bricks elements, controls, schema, hooks, templates, styling, responsive settings, dynamic data, queries, forms, interactions, custom elements, or page JSON. Do not use merely because Bricks Builder is mentioned, for generic WordPress, PHP, CSS, or JavaScript work, or for maintaining, naming, versioning, documenting, or releasing this Skill repository.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pin a measurable, outcome-based Definition of Done for a diamond — a behaviour-change that creates value, not a build-list. Problem-first Socratic sequence; writes definition_of_done to the diamond at birth or retrofits it when missing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Render `.claude/canvas/cycle-history.yml` as a Gantt chart + outcome distribution pie (or ascii / json). Read-only. Consults the attribution registry per `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/engine/render-conventions.md` consent + privacy gate. Third specialist in the render fleet.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds probability-weighted valuation models with multiple exit scenarios, timing assumptions, and risk-adjusted returns. Use when building growth equity valuations, modeling scenario-weighted outcomes, or analyzing risk-adjusted returns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds growth equity return models with minority/majority economics, participation rights, and preference stack analysis. Use when modeling growth equity returns, projecting minority investment outcomes, or analyzing preference structures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates master and special servicer performance with delinquency management, modification outcomes, and loss mitigation effectiveness. Use when assessing servicer quality, monitoring servicing metrics, or evaluating servicer transfers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Constructs accretion/dilution analysis with pro forma financials, synergy phasing, and purchase price allocation. Use when modeling merger outcomes, calculating EPS accretion, or analyzing deal structures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates SPAC de-SPAC transaction economics with sponsor dilution, redemption risk, PIPE analysis, and warrant impact. Use when analyzing SPAC deals, evaluating sponsor economics, or modeling de-SPAC outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Constructs venture return models with entry valuation, follow-on reserve, multiple scenario exits, and portfolio-level fund math. Use when modeling VC returns, calculating fund economics, or projecting portfolio outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates proxy fight mechanics with shareholder base analysis, ISS/Glass Lewis recommendations, and vote probability modeling. Use when analyzing proxy contests, assessing vote outcomes, or evaluating director nomination campaigns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates activist investor campaigns with thesis assessment, proposed changes, and likely outcome analysis. Use when analyzing activist situations, evaluating campaign theses, or assessing activist track records.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates distressed debt opportunities with recovery analysis, liquidity assessment, and potential restructuring outcomes. Use when screening distressed situations, analyzing stressed credits, or evaluating workout scenarios.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve router-facing pipeline and reflection narration to reduce noisy status churn and make Step 0/Reflection outcomes explicit. Use when updating Router output contract, reflection reminder wording, or post-pipeline notification batching.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate and scientifically interpret completed research runs, including negative, null, boundary, confounded, failed, and inconclusive outcomes. Use after execution to assess evidence and claim impact; not to edit methods or schedule experiments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create consistent nn_cfd W&B experiment comparison reports from selected run IDs using wandb and wandb_workspaces. Use this whenever the user asks to report experiment results, create a W&B Report, compare CFD training/eval runs, document baseline-vs-variant outcomes, reproduce the project experiment report template, or publish a leaderboard-style report for milieu/nn_cfd.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-step recovery strategy to turn a specific negative review into a positive outcome
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。