「proposal」の検索結果

Economic analysis of government intervention -- taxation (incidence, efficiency, optimal design), regulation (cost-benefit, market failure correction), externalities (Pigouvian taxation, cap-and-trade, Coasian bargaining), and public goods provision (non-rivalry, non-excludability, free-rider problem). Covers welfare analysis of policy interventions, government failure, and the institutional context of policy-making. Use when evaluating policy proposals, analyzing tax effects, assessing regulatory design, or reasoning about the appropriate scope of government action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform transcript analysis findings into actionable improvements. Triggers on "generate hooks from findings", "improve agent", "fix anti-pattern", "kaizen improvement", "generate hook proposals", or "create improvement plan". Provides templates for hook generation, agent prompt refinement, skill patches, CLAUDE.md updates, and script automation from analysis data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Institution ratings, consensus price targets, EPS/revenue forecasts, finance calendar, shareholder data, fund holders, insider trades (SEC Form 4), short interest, industry rankings, peer group analysis via Longbridge. Frameworks: investment proposals, coverage initiation, stock research, competitive analysis, financial planning, and DeFi/on-chain analysis. Triggers: "机构评级", "目标价", "一致预期", "EPS预测", "内部人交易", "空头", "行业排名", "投资提案", "首次覆盖", "竞争格局", "财务规划", "DeFi收益", "链上数据", "機構評級", "目標價", "一致預期", "內部人交易", "空頭", "投資提案", "首次覆蓋", "競爭格局", "鏈上數據", "analyst rating", "price target", "consensus", "insider trades", "short interest", "coverage initiation", "DeFi yield", "on-chain", "earnings calendar", "finance calendar", "财报日历", "下周谁财报", "下周财报", "下周有哪些财报", "哪些财报", "谁财报", "FOMC", "非农", "股东", "谁持有", "股東", "基金持仓", "基金持倉", "機構評級", "目標價", "財務規劃"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a GitHub issue title and body using the target repository's issue templates under .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE. Use when the user asks to create, draft, or file a GitHub issue, bug report, feature request, chore, documentation issue, or RFC proposal, or wants issue text that matches the repo's template.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect and govern local Skills: inventory, usage evidence, duplicates, broken links, Core/On-demand proposals, Plans, Receipts, Apply, and Undo. Also find a specialized local Skill when the user requests one or the task would benefit from instructions beyond the visible catalog. Ordinary work can proceed with the Agent's existing capabilities. Not for installing third-party Skills or migrating, distributing, synchronizing, or repairing shared Skill-manager directories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic sales leadership guidance for B2B SaaS and enterprise software companies. Covers sales strategy, team building, pipeline management, enterprise selling, discovery calls, demos, proposals, negotiations, and sales operations. Use when building sales teams, designing sales processes, improving win rates, or scaling revenue operations. Use for "sales strategy", "sales process", "pipeline review", "deal strategy", "sales hiring", "quota planning".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop evidence-backed structural and architectural security hardening proposals from vulnerability disclosures, supplied findings, incident or assessment documents, source code, or a completed Codex Security scan. Use when a user asks for systemic improvements, alternatives beyond per-finding patches, before-and-after security architecture views, engineering tradeoff analysis, or an implementation-ready plan for a selected hardening option. Also use automatically after a Codex Security scan with reportable findings when the top-level scan workflow requests final-report hardening guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and decompose a product topic into a text-only proposal for the repository's .pm board. Use when the user wants to pressure-test scope, size milestones, identify dependencies, or prepare exact PM board commands without writing board files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic root-cause isolation and minimal fix proposal for software bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses conglomerate break-up activism with segment valuation, separation feasibility, and tax-free qualification analysis. Use when evaluating SOTP activism, analyzing break-up proposals, or modeling separation value.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures credit committee packages with borrower analysis, risk assessment, structuring proposal, and recommendation documentation. Use when preparing credit committee materials, presenting loan opportunities, or documenting credit decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates management buyouts and take-private proposals with fairness assessment, minority squeeze-out mechanics, and appraisal rights analysis. Use when analyzing going-private deals, evaluating MBO fairness, or assessing minority shareholder protections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a new feature with proposal, retrospective, and branch. Use when starting new development work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when stress-testing a proposal, plan, architecture or decision before committing to it, such as pre-mortems, assumption audits, "should we even do this?" questions, or when everyone agrees too easily. Not for code review; it challenges strategy, approach and hidden risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a peer review of research methodology, experimental design, and manuscript quality. Covers methodology evaluation, statistical appropriateness, reproducibility assessment, bias identification, and constructive feedback. Use when reviewing a manuscript, preprint, or internal research report, evaluating a research proposal or study protocol, assessing evidence quality behind a claim, or reviewing a thesis chapter or dissertation section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Redact reverse-engineering findings for public disclosure while preserving methodology, generalizable patterns, and teaching value. Covers the private-vs-public repo split, deny-list pattern maintenance, orphan-commit publish pattern that prevents `git log` leaks, category-based redaction calibration (methodology/pattern/version-finding/internal), and the `check-redaction.sh`-style CI gate that blocks merges when a deny-listed pattern appears. Use when publishing findings about a CLI harness you don't own, when preparing upstream proposals to an unrelated project, or when archiving a private research repo for public reference.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a Quarto-based tour report with embedded maps, daily itineraries, logistics tables, and accommodation/transport details. Produces a self-contained HTML or PDF document suitable for offline use during travel. Use when compiling a planned tour into a shareable document, creating an offline-accessible travel guide, documenting a completed trip with photos and statistics, or producing a professional tour proposal for a group or client.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically interpret nuclear magnetic resonance spectra (1H, 13C, DEPT, and 2D experiments) to elucidate molecular structure. Covers chemical shift assignment, coupling pattern analysis, integration, and correlation of multi-dimensional data into coherent structural proposals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evolve SKILL.md files from agent execution traces using a three-stage pipeline: trajectory collection from observed runs, parallel multi-agent patch proposal for error and success analysis, and conflict-free consolidation of overlapping edits via prevalence-weighting. Based on the Trace2Skill methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Construct well-structured arguments using the hypothesis-argument-example triad. Covers formulating falsifiable hypotheses, building logical arguments (deductive, inductive, analogical, evidential), providing concrete examples, and steelmanning counterarguments. Use when writing or reviewing PR descriptions that propose technical changes, justifying design decisions in ADRs, constructing substantive code review feedback, or building a research argument or technical proposal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Achieve distributed agreement without central authority using bee democracy, threshold voting, and quorum sensing. Covers proposal generation, advocacy dynamics, commitment thresholds, deadlock resolution, and consensus quality assessment. Use when a group must decide between options without a designated leader, when centralized decision-making is a bottleneck, when stakeholders have different perspectives to integrate, or when designing automated systems that must reach consensus such as distributed databases or multi-agent AI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when any bounded workflow starts or reaches an action, path, proposal, or merge boundary. Refuses rather than default-allow on an unreadable constraint set.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when independent proposals on a contested decision need cross-critique before choosing, reusing the original authors. Not for parallel multi-stance investigation: use council.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。