542 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when analyzing failing test cases to determine whether failures indicate genuine bugs or test implementation issues. Activates on "analyze failing tests", "debug test failures", "investigate test errors", or when provided with specific failing test names or output. Applies balanced investigative reasoning — does not auto-fix tests without establishing root cause.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Activates Standard of Excellence enforcement for the current session. Load before starting any task to apply completion standards: finish the whole thing, fix the root cause, ship the complete working result. Blocks partial solutions, workarounds, deferred threads, and invented content limits when the permanent solve is within reach. Triggers: 'do the whole thing', 'boil the ocean', 'standard of excellence', 'finish it completely', before starting any implementation, refactoring, or multi-step task where partial output is a risk. Does NOT apply to: read-only queries, one-line typo fixes, pure knowledge questions, or single-output summarize requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic debugging specialist focused on root cause analysis
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Five-Whys Root-Cause Analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate an alert, page, or production symptom in an incident channel or a team's oncall / monitoring channel, and report findings a human can verify. Ordinary conversation and chatter are not alerts; leave those alone. Use when an alert or page lands, when error rate, latency or saturation is up, when someone asks "why is X broken", "investigate", "what changed", "root cause this", pastes a monitor, dashboard, trace or error-tracker link, or reports production trouble; also by default when an alert lands in a covered channel unasked. Feed-level asks land here too ("which alerts matter", "triage today's alerts"), plus the scheduled alert-review routine and the ticket path ("customer X can't check out"). Runs a fast first pass posted as a short interim update with a TL;DR, every finding carrying the query or link to verify it, then proposes the fix and — with connector access and confirmation — carries it out, never unattended. Afterwards `incident-postmortem` writes it up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Uses AWS SDK CloudWatchClient GetMetricData and CloudWatch Logs Insights StartQueryExecution to automate incident triage. Correlates alarms via DescribeAlarms with X-Ray trace segments for root cause analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triages AWS CloudWatch alarms by correlating alarm state changes with CloudTrail events and EC2 instance health using boto3. Classifies alarms by severity, identifies root cause candidates, and updates OpsGenie alerts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triages AWS CloudWatch alarms using the CloudWatch DescribeAlarms API, GetMetricData for historical analysis, and CloudTrail LookupEvents for root cause correlation. Prioritizes alerts by blast radius and provides remediation playbooks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses firing AWS CloudWatch alarms by querying CloudWatch Metrics, alarm history, and related AWS Config resource snapshots via the AWS SDK. Correlates metric anomalies with recent infrastructure changes to suggest root cause hypotheses. Outputs a structured incident summary with remediation options.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for debugging and system comprehension. Triggers: debug this, root cause, how does X work, reverse engineer, 왜 안 돼, 디버깅, 원인 분석, 로직 파악, 뜯어봐.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Living catalogue of 7 known hazard entries (SE-01 through SE-07) specific to agent-studio: Windows backslash paths, prototype pollution, hook exit codes, async swallowing, ReDoS in glob-to-regex, DST arithmetic, array mutation during iteration. Each entry: symptom, root cause, fix, test assertion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write effective blameless postmortems with root cause analysis, timelines, and action items. Use when conducting incident reviews, writing postmortem documents, or improving incident response processes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic 4-phase debugging with root cause investigation. Use when fixing bugs to prevent random fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when EZ_math_model coder or packaging fails repeatedly with the same error and needs root-cause analysis instead of another blind retry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
用户面对多个相互关联的问题, 不知道先解决哪个时; 当需要区分根本原因 与表面症状时; 当问题有先后因果链需要追溯源头时。 不适用于: 只有一个简单问题的场景、问题之间没有因果关系的场景。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sustained neutral pattern recognition across systems without urgency or intervention. Maps naturalist field study methodology to AI reasoning: framing the observation target, witnessing with sustained attention, recording patterns, categorizing findings, generating hypotheses, and archiving a pattern library for future reference. Use when a system's behavior is unclear and action would be premature, when debugging an unknown root cause, when a codebase change needs its effects witnessed before further changes, or when auditing own reasoning patterns for biases or recurring errors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Instrument applications with OpenTelemetry for distributed tracing, including auto and manual instrumentation, context propagation, sampling strategies, and integration with Jaeger or Tempo. Use when debugging latency issues in distributed systems, understanding request flow across microservices, correlating traces with logs and metrics for root cause analysis, measuring end-to-end latency, or migrating from legacy tracing systems to OpenTelemetry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI solution exploration using ant colony optimization — deploying scout hypotheses, reinforcing promising approaches, detecting diminishing returns, and knowing when to abandon a strategy. Use when facing a problem with multiple plausible approaches and no clear winner, when the first approach is not working but alternatives are unclear, when debugging with no obvious root cause requiring parallel hypothesis investigation, or when previous attempts have converged prematurely on a suboptimal approach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement AI-powered anomaly detection for operational metrics using time series analysis (Isolation Forest, Prophet, LSTM), alert correlation, and root cause analysis. Reduce alert fatigue by intelligently identifying true anomalies in system metrics, logs, and traces. Use when operations teams are overwhelmed by alert volume, when detecting complex multi-metric anomalies beyond static thresholds, when seasonal patterns make thresholds ineffective, or when needing to predict issues proactively before they impact users.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unify metrics, logs, and traces for cohesive debugging. Implement exemplars for log-to-trace linking, build unified dashboards using RED/USE methods, and enable rapid root cause analysis across observability signals. Use when investigating complex incidents spanning multiple systems, reducing mean time to resolution, implementing distributed tracing, or moving from siloed tools to a unified observability platform.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when landing a queue of open PRs: gate each PR, sweep its review feedback to root cause, then merge, repair, hold, or close it. Human-only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
RFDB server becomes unresponsive (60s+ timeouts) during enricher addEdges write storms. Use when: (1) RFDB CPU spikes to 60-90% after addEdges calls; (2) subsequent reads time out at 60s; (3) server stays catatonic for 5-15 min after a write storm; (4) Tokio main thread parked (write-lock contention). Root cause: add_edges() calls maybe_auto_flush() which has a memory-pressure path that fires on NODE count — not edge count — and holds the exclusive write lock during disk I/O. Fix: separate maybe_auto_flush_edges() uses byte-limit only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix stale Haskell analyzer binaries silently being used by the orchestrator even after a successful rebuild. Use when: (1) modified `packages/js-analyzer/` or other Haskell analyzer source, ran `scripts/build-native.sh ... cabal install`, but a subsequent `grafema analyze` shows old behavior (missing new edges, no new node types, etc.), (2) `~/.cabal/bin/grafema-analyzer` has fresh timestamp but `grafema analyze` produces output as if the change didn't happen, (3) a test verifying new analyzer output passes locally in unit tests but fails in end-to-end runs that go through the orchestrator. Root cause: the Rust orchestrator's `resolve_binary` checks `~/.grafema/bin/<name>` BEFORE `~/.cabal/bin/<name>`, so any stale copy that was once installed there (possibly months ago) shadows the fresh `cabal install` output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix nodes silently disappearing from RFDB when an enricher or post-resolution pass writes new nodes via BatchHandle. Use when: (1) writing a TypeScript enricher that should ADD nodes/edges to existing files, (2) after calling `client.createBatch()` + `batch.addNode({file: 'X', ...})` + `batch.commit()` the original nodes in file X have vanished, (3) tests that load a graph fixture, run an enricher, then query original nodes get empty results, (4) a verification step shows expected nodes pre-enrichment but 0 post-enrichment. Root cause: `BatchHandle.commit()` invokes RFDB's `commit_batch` which AUTO-POPULATES `changed_files` from each added node's `file` field, then the server DELETES all existing nodes whose `file` matches before inserting new ones — file-level upsert semantics. This is correct for the JS/Haskell analyzers (which fully re-emit a file's contents) but catastrophic for enrichers that only ADD to existing files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。