「verdict」の検索結果

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Business Officer archetype, covering commercial model, partnerships, deal structure, market positioning, strategic fit and opportunity cost, and returns a DRAFT review with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, commercial risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CBO review", "pressure-test this partnership", "check the deal structure" or "what would a commercial executive say about this". Do not use for pipeline, quota, sales-motion or forecast reviews, use cro-reviewer instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dual-layer PR review tool (Raven's Verdict). Runs adversarial cynical review and edge case hunter in parallel, merges and deduplicates findings into professional engineering output. Use when user asks to 'review a PR' and provides a PR url or id.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-test both Telegram rails on this machine, the MCP connector and the userbot library, with a deterministic zero-token detector plus a real in-session MCP probe, and print a per-rail verdict with the exact fix for whichever is down. Triggers: "/tg-check", "are both tg rails up", "check telegram channels".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review content quality before anything is shown or sent (vault notes, outgoing drafts, dedup merges, service files) and return an explicit pass, fail or manual-review verdict. The counterpart of a post-build test gate: that one asks whether the build works, this one whether the writing is fit to show. Triggers: "/taste-check <path|text>", "/taste", "check this note".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn any hypothesis, however fringe, into an argument map rather than a verdict: five independent lenses (consensus, skeptic, frontier, historian, experimental design), then a synthesis of for and against, evidence quality, a confidence tier and the cheapest decisive experiment. Triggers: "/research-swarm <hypothesis>", "map the arguments on X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Health-check the second brain so failures are not silent: is the local search server alive, is the RAG index fresh, is the session-memory ledger filling, did the nightly distillation run. Read-only, with a green/red verdict per component. Triggers: "/brain", "/memory", "is the reindex alive".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-vendor code review: this agent reviews the other agent's diff and the other agent reviews this one's, so the final check always comes from a different model. Verdicts are APPROVE or REQUEST_CHANGES with file:line references. Triggers: "/codex-review", "cross-review this diff", "have the other vendor check this".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research any open-source repository end to end and answer the core question — SHOULD YOU contribute to it? — with a GO / NO-GO / GO-IF verdict backed by evidence: snapshot, momentum, contribution landscape (PR acceptance rates, outside-contributor merge rates, first-timer outcomes), issue health, governance, community sentiment, and a final go/no-go recommendation. Use when the user asks 'should I contribute to X', wants a before-I-contribute due-diligence check on a project, asks whether a project accepts outside PRs, wants contribution-health numbers like PR merge rates or stale-PR counts, or asks for a deep dive on an open-source codebase's health and dynamics before investing time in it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage acc's open promises and close them with honest real-world verdicts via acc_act(runtime="outcome").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "run the weekly social readout", "which denominator does our engagement rate use", or "which posts won this week and what changes next cycle"; produces the organic-social metric dictionary (every rate names its denominator — ERR engagement-by-reach vs ERI by-impressions vs ER-by-follower — locked across periods), median-not-mean per-post rollups with organic and boosted separated, EMV as labeled exec-translation only (never inside any score), an attributed CHAOSS/Orbit-style community-health readout with employees excluded, and the best/worst-performer write-back the next calendar cycle consumes. Not for dollar-ROI math or the ECHO profile result gate verdict — use roi-calculator and social-quality-auditor. 社媒周报/互动率分母/指标字典/复盘回写

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "find trending topics", "what trends should my brand jump on", or "time a campaign around a cultural moment"; produces a ranked trend report with brand-fit scores, format calls (rising/peak/declining), a cultural calendar, and go/skip recommendations. Not for finding the creators to run those trends — use influencer-discovery; not for building the brand posting calendar from a go verdict — use social-calendar-builder. 热点趋势洞察/借势营销

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build my brand-safety exclusion lists", "set placement / topic / content exclusions before launch", "add network and audience exclusions", or "prep the A1 brand-safety evidence for the auditor"; produces a placement/network exclusion list, a content-suitability & sensitive-topic block list, an audience/negative-audience exclusion set, and a packaged A1 brand/placement-safety evidence file for the gate. Not for building the audiences you target — use audience-segment-builder; not for computing the RQS or issuing the A1 verdict — use ad-account-auditor. 品牌安全/排除位置/否定受众列表

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "run a deliverability pre-flight before I send", "check my SPF/DKIM/DMARC/BIMI", "why am I landing in spam / promotions", or "score my sender reputation and list hygiene"; runs the ONE-TIME pre-send SEND S1 authentication pre-flight and builds the SEND S (Sender-integrity / Deliverability) evidence read — DNS + DMARC-RUA auth, domain/IP reputation, inbox placement, content/link/render, and point-in-time bounce/complaint hygiene — using Pass/Partial/Fail/Unknown/N/A states and scoring only at complete applicable coverage. Not for the recurring hygiene trend — use list-hygiene-monitor; not for final EQS or veto verdicts — use email-quality-auditor; not for segments/suppression lists — use list-segment-builder. 邮件送达率预检/SPF DKIM DMARC认证/发件域声誉

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute production-readiness gates with applicability control, consolidate validation report, and issue final readiness verdict

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate phase validation across code-quality and production-readiness gates with mandatory reporting and verdicting

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute ambiguity audit document-by-document with implementer simulation, rubric scoring, cross-layer checks, remediation, and verdicting

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare a project for open sourcing: a sanitized fork with secrets and internal references stripped, a sanitizer verdict, README and LICENSE, then a new PRIVATE GitHub repo created and pushed only after GO. The playbook never makes the repo public. Use for "open source this project", "make a sanitized fork", "prepare a public release".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured 3-phase peer review of a diff or PR — intent, issues by severity, then pointed merge-readiness questions and a verdict. Use for general code review. Not for AI workflow self-fix-and-edit (ai-systems-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate threat models (adversarial-challenge). Phase 3 asks questions only; it is not the adversarial-challenge skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convergence loop that iteratively improves work until quality thresholds are met. Use when: (1) "refine this", "make this better", "iterate on this", (2) After /analyst gives a REVISE verdict, (3) Output quality is below 8/10, (4) "run the refinery loop on this". Reads analyst reviews from system/reviews/. Generates, scores, diagnoses, rewrites, re-scores. Stops when all dimensions >= 8/10 or diminishing returns detected. Outputs to system/refinery-log.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Senior engineering analyst for code review, plan review, and automation review. Four-lens review covering architecture, code quality, reliability, and performance, each scored 1-10. Delivers APPROVE, REVISE, or REJECT verdicts. Use when you need a code review, plan review, quality check, or want to verify work before shipping. Part of the architect-system loop. Reads from system/blueprints/ and source code. Outputs to system/reviews/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convergence loop that iteratively improves work until quality thresholds are met. Scores, diagnoses specific weaknesses, rewrites, re-scores, and repeats until all dimensions reach 8/10 or diminishing returns are detected. Use when you want to refine or iterate on work, after the analyst gives a REVISE verdict, or when output quality is below your bar. Part of the architect-system loop. Outputs to system/refinery-log.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Product-research (选品) desk (Busabase App-in-Skill) for a cross-border e-commerce seller. The agent sweeps trend sources — Amazon BSR movers, TikTok viral product videos, Temu/AliExpress rising items, Google Trends terms, competitor new launches — and files product candidates with margin cards (landed cost, fees, breakeven ACOS) and competition reads; Kelly verdicts them develop / watch / drop, and develop items become sourcing and listing briefs handed to kelly-listing. Use when the user invokes $kelly-picks or /kelly-picks, or asks for 选品, product research, a product sourcing radar, BSR movers, TikTok viral products, a margin calculator, breakeven ACOS, competition reads, or product candidate triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Outbound email-marketing desk (Busabase App-in-Skill) for building segments, drafting campaigns, newsletters, and sequences, running pre-send deliverability and subject-line QA, and approving every send before it is scheduled. Structured around the SEND discipline — Setup, Engage, Nurture, Deliver — with an email-quality-auditor gate (EQS score + SHIP/FIX/BLOCK verdict). Use when the user invokes $kelly-campaigns or /kelly-campaigns, or mentions email marketing, campaigns, newsletters, drip/welcome/win-back sequences, broadcasts, segments, subject-line A/B tests, deliverability (SPF/DKIM/DMARC/spam score/inbox placement), or wants to review and approve marketing email before it is sent. This is OUTBOUND marketing to a subscriber list, distinct from kelly-email inbox triage (incoming mail). 出站邮件营销：策划分群、起草营销活动 / 新闻邮件 / 邮件序列，发送前做可送达性与主题行质检，人工审批后再排期发送。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds an automated malware submission and analysis pipeline that collects suspicious files from endpoints and email gateways, submits them to sandbox environments and multi-engine scanners, and generates verdicts with IOCs for SIEM integration. Use when SOC teams need to scale malware analysis beyond manual sandbox submissions for high-volume alert triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。