「exe」の検索結果

Expert guidance for Swift Testing: test structure, #expect/#require macros, traits and tags, parameterized tests, test plans, parallel execution, async waiting patterns, and XCTest migration. Use when writing new Swift tests, modernizing XCTest suites, debugging flaky tests, or improving test quality and maintainability in Apple-platform or Swift server projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and generate Convex database schemas with proper validation, indexes, and relationships. Use when creating schema.ts or modifying table definitions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and execute Convex schema migrations safely, including adding fields, creating tables, and data transformations. Use when schema changes affect existing data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns for scaling read-heavy Convex apps to millions of users. Use when optimizing bandwidth, reducing query costs, fixing slow queries, creating digest tables, replacing reactive subscriptions with one-shot fetches, adding compound indexes, debouncing writes, rate-controlling backfills, or running npx convex insights. Trigger when users mention "scale", "bandwidth", "performance", "optimize", "slow queries", "expensive queries", "digest table", "denormalize", or "thundering herd" in the context of Convex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding WHERE to do work on Syntropic137 itself - "run this through Syntropic", "dispatch a workflow", "should this go in a workspace or local", "kick off a run on the Mini", "dogfood this", "build Syntropic inside Syntropic", "why did the agent's push fail", "can an agent run our QA", "the execution says completed but nothing shipped". Covers what a workspace agent can and cannot do, why `.github/workflows` pushes must come from the local machine, how to write a task prompt that does not repeat a known failure, and how to verify a run actually delivered. Do NOT use for PR/release mechanics (see `devops`), for using the `syn` CLI as an end user (see the syntropic137 plugin skills), or for authoring workflow YAML.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when acting as the orchestrator agent that drives Syntropic137 - running the dogfood loop, deciding what to dispatch next, landing agent PRs, deploying a beta, triaging failed executions, or keeping the scratchpad, paper cuts and retrospectives current. Trigger phrases include "orchestrator tick", "keep the loop running", "what should we dispatch next", "land these PRs", "why are PRs stacking up", "deploy the next beta", "pit stop", "the run failed, what now", "write the retro", "is the system helping", "scale quality", "learning loop for the orchestrator". Do NOT use for deciding whether one task belongs in a workspace or locally (see `dogfooding`), for turning one incident into an eval case (see `learning-loop`), for designing a workflow A/B experiment (see `workflow-experimentation`), or for release-branch and version-bump mechanics (see `devops`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when turning something that happened into something that makes the next run better - "write a retro", "record this paper cut", "this bug escaped verification", "make this an eval", "why do we keep hitting this", "did that change actually help", "scorecard", "what did we learn from that run", "lessons keep getting re-learned". Covers the six-step loop (capture, classify, convert, change, measure, retro), the repo artifact each step produces, and how escaped bugs become eval cases. Do NOT use to design or judge a single workflow experiment (see `workflow-experimentation`, which this loop feeds), to decide where to run work (see `dogfooding`), or to debug one failed execution in the moment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, running, or judging an experiment on a Syntropic137 workflow - comparing prompt variants, fan-out vs single agent, adversarial cross-model review, model selection (can Haiku do this job), phase splits, or tool grants. Trigger phrases include "run a workflow experiment", "A/B the workflow", "does fan-out help", "which model for this phase", "is this prompt better", "measure review quality", "why did the workflow do that". Do NOT use for a one-off workflow run that is just doing work, for authoring a workflow that is not being compared against anything, or for debugging a single failed execution (that is ordinary debugging).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Control Herdr, a terminal multiplexer for coding agents. Use only when the user explicitly mentions Herdr or asks to use Herdr to inspect or control panes, tabs, workspaces, commands, or another agent. Do not use merely because a task could benefit from a background terminal, delegation, or parallel work. Requires HERDR_ENV=1.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: Tester runs a full QA session, processes a Builder handoff, executes test steps, writes a GitHub test report, or aligns ticket state after verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow automation is the infrastructure that makes AI agents reliable. Without durable execution, a network hiccup during a 10-step payment flow means lost money and angry customers. With it, workflows resume exactly where they left off. This skill covers the platforms (n8n, Temporal, Inngest) and patterns (sequential, parallel, orchestrator-worker) that turn brittle scripts into production-grade automation. Key insight: The platforms make different tradeoffs. n8n optimizes for accessibility

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger.dev expert for background jobs, AI workflows, and reliable async execution with excellent developer experience and TypeScript-first design. Use when: trigger.dev, trigger dev, background task, ai background job, long running task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates design workflows by routing work through brainstorming, multi-agent review, and execution readiness in the correct order. Prevents premature implementation, skipped validation, and unreviewed high-risk designs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Planning workflow - OBSERVE → ORIENT → PLAN → APPROVE → EXECUTE → DOCUMENT

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured guide for setting up A/B tests with mandatory gates for hypothesis, metrics, and execution readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BullMQ expert for Redis-backed job queues, background processing, and reliable async execution in Node.js/TypeScript applications. Use when: bullmq, bull queue, redis queue, background job, job queue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a one-line objective into a step-by-step construction plan any coding agent can execute cold. Each step has a self-contained context brief — a fresh agent in a new session can pick up any step without reading prior steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize Bazel builds for large-scale monorepos. Use when configuring Bazel, implementing remote execution, or optimizing build performance for enterprise codebases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BullMQ expert for Redis-backed job queues, background processing, and reliable async execution in Node.js/TypeScript applications. Use when: bullmq, bull queue, redis queue, background job, job queue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute comprehensive web application security testing using Burp Suite's integrated toolset, including HTTP traffic interception and modification, request analysis and replay, automated vulnerability scanning, and manual testing workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure Monitor Query SDK for Java. Execute Kusto queries against Log Analytics workspaces and query metrics from Azure resources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modern .NET execution model with process isolation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。