「cis」の検索結果

Use when a user asks for a concise Solana token research snapshot with market, trade, and security context

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Control Claude Code via MCP protocol. Trigger with "plan" to write a precise execution plan then feed it to Claude Code. Also supports direct commands, persistent sessions, agent teams, and advanced tool control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Periodic repository health check — install, full validation, unused-code scan, outdated/vulnerable dependencies, and docs drift — ending in a concise report and, when there are safe fixes, a single PR. Designed to run unattended from a scheduled routine; also usable on demand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Development methodology rules (Clean Architecture, TDD flow, 3-Strike rule, decision priority) that govern planning, implementation, and review. Load before designing, staging, implementing, or reviewing code changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explicit-only interview loop for stress-testing a plan, decision, or idea. Use only when the user asks to grill, interrogate, interview, or stress-test their thinking before action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use only when actively changing glossary or ubiquitous-language terms, or recording a durable architectural decision; merely reading a glossary is not a trigger.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize user interviews, observations, surveys, support tickets, reviews, or feedback into traceable themes, insights, tensions, opportunities, and research gaps; use when evidence must inform product or design decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a product requirement, PRD, brief, or meeting note before design or development; expose missing decisions, contradictions, edge cases, dependencies, and validation gaps without inventing business rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review WBS (Work Breakdown Structure) Excel files against requirements docs, hearing sheets, and prior decisions to identify gaps, inconsistencies, and deviations. Add review comments to Excel cells and generate summary reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-reference project artifacts (WBS, meeting minutes, requirements docs) by date, participant, and action items. Extract commitments from meeting minutes and link to WBS tasks. Generate traceability reports showing which decisions were captured in which documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review meeting minutes documents for completeness, action item clarity, decision documentation, and consistency with source materials like hearing sheets. Use when validating meeting minutes quality or preparing minutes for distribution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Professional financial analysis skill for investment decisions, budgeting, financial statement analysis, and business plan evaluation. Use this skill when you need to analyze financial ratios (profitability, safety, efficiency), calculate DCF/NPV/IRR valuations, perform budget variance analysis, or conduct sensitivity/scenario analysis. Triggers include "analyze financial statements", "calculate DCF", "investment evaluation", "budget variance", "財務分析", "投資評価", "予算差異分析".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bootstrap a new or existing project with a small, file-based documentation system so Claude Code keeps context, lessons, and decisions across session restarts instead of starting cold every time. Sets up a handful of markdown files under .claude/ (standing rules, a free-form note to your next session, a phased roadmap, a prioritized backlog, and searchable history/changelog archives) sized and split so the files read every session stay small while the archives grow without ever costing context. Use this whenever someone is starting a new project and asks how to structure it for long-running AI-assisted work, wants Claude to "remember" things between sessions without relying on chat history, asks for a CLAUDE.md + backlog + changelog setup, mentions "session continuity", "persistent context", "project memory system", or is retrofitting an existing codebase that has no such system yet. Also use to explain or extend an already-bootstrapped bottle system (add a rule, start the archival script, add a new backlog section).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user explicitly invokes the `if` skill or asks for a concise, laconic, no-fluff, or to-the-point answer. Do not trigger on the ordinary word or programming keyword `if`. Detailed, step-by-step, exhaustive, educational, or fixed-length requests activate only when they also include an explicit invocation or brevity request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, verify, transfer, and resume compact project handoff packets for long-running Codex work. Use after a second observed automatic context compaction, immediately after a third compaction, when attention or constraints degrade, a major phase ends, the user asks to move work into a fresh task, work must pause, or an existing handoff needs to be imported. Do not interrupt after the first normal compaction. Always ask before creating a new task, transfer the global roadmap only after explicit consent, preserve the old task title when available, then require the fresh task to ask what work matters most. Preserve objectives, constraints, decisions, evidence, approval boundaries, workspace state, validation, and risks without treating an old summary as current truth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user starts a non-trivial coding/building task in Claude Code (e.g. "帮我做个 X", "help me build Y", "add feature Z", "搭一个 Z"). Layers an AI-native pedagogical coat over normal coding work — surfaces implicit assumptions in user intent, annotates non-trivial design decisions inline with brief concept-scaffolding for terms the user may not know, and replaces "should I run it?" handoffs with rigorous AI self-verification plus a clean list of what only the user can verify. Skip for pure Q&A, single-line edits, read-only investigation, or refactoring along an existing pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create concise checklist cheatsheets from official tool docs. Use for docs URLs, setup guides, or updating existing cheatsheets. Don't use for long tutorials or API references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a Marty-Cagan-style opportunity assessment interview and produce a ~2-page Opportunity Brief in Confluence. Covers business objective, customer, problem, success metric, current alternatives, assumptions/risks, and what we don't know yet. Triggers on "opportunity brief", "opportunity assessment", "discovery brief", "who is this for", "why are we building this", "validate this idea", "product discovery", or any request to frame a feature before implementation. One question at a time. Records accepted research gaps as structured Confluence Decision pages with bidirectional links.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user deeply about a plan, probing technical implementation, UI/UX, risks, tradeoffs, and missing decisions before writing or refining a spec. Use when the user says "interview me" or asks to be questioned about a plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarify ambiguous or conflicting requests by researching first, then asking only judgment calls. Use when prompts say "grill me", ask hard questions, request relentless interrogation, pressure-test assumptions, clarify scope/requirements, define success criteria, or request system-design/optimization decisions before implementation; stop before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply Steven's Bash script style rules: strict mode, minimal validation, concise logic, executable scripts, and no unnecessary comments or echoes. Use when creating, reviewing, or refactoring shell scripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically explore an unfamiliar codebase and build a reusable architecture summary. Use for repo onboarding, understanding legacy or inherited code, mapping architecture before a migration or refactor, tracing a bug or feature path, or answering "what does this project do?". Documentation-first, then data flow — ends in a concise technical architecture summary with file:line evidence, not a raw file dump.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative deep planning with critiques and alternatives. Use when facing complex design decisions, cross-platform changes, native module modifications, or API changes requiring thorough analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a new or changed ADR into implemented behavior, routing docs, tests, and guardrails rather than leaving it as standalone prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。