「code mode」の検索結果

Infectious disease modeling with SIR/SEIR models — R0, fitting, forecasting, and intervention scenarios.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proven prompts behind viral AI-made videos across 4 models — Claude, Muse AI, ChatGPT, Gemini. Browse by model, category, or tech tag, copy a creator's prompt, adapt it to your own model and renderer. Use when you need a motion-graphic, explainer visual, 3D scene, interactive animation, or AI video-gen prompt that already worked in the wild.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explicit-only last resort. Draws game art from code, with no image model - pixel sprites from a PixelSpec, flat vector props, UI and icons from portable SVG, rigged characters with planted feet, FX with a JS runtime, seam-proven autotiles, playable top-down layouts with collision, stylized parallax and ambient plate motion - palette-exact, with QA and review sheets. Use only when the user explicitly asks for code-drawn art, or when generate2dmedia route_media.py finds no image or video route (no-route, exit 3). Never the default - image generation (generate2dsprite, generate2dmap, video2dsprite) comes first for characters, props, maps and FX. Not for painterly, detailed or likeness art, HD-2D plates or realistic fire, smoke or water. Always disclose the result as code-drawn.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an adversarial two-phase code review of a change with TWO independent reviewers — Claude and Codex — who review alone, then cross-examine each other's findings, then Claude synthesizes a single weighted verdict. Use when the user says "/adversarial-review", "adversarial review", "review this with Codex", "get Codex to review", "two-reviewer review", "cross-examine this PR", or wants a second independent model to grade a change before merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when defining clinical data model requirements for Health Cloud: HL7/FHIR data mapping, interoperability requirements, FHIR R4-aligned object activation, CodeableConcept constraints, and middleware translation requirements. NOT for the field-level mapping work itself — use data/fhir-data-mapping. NOT for choosing legacy HC24__ EHR objects vs standard clinical objects — use data/health-cloud-data-model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the Skmtc CLI to scaffold projects, install or clone generators from JSR, configure schema sources and enrichments, and produce code artifacts from an OpenAPI v3 or GraphQL SDL schema. Teaches the workspace mental model (`<root>/.skmtc/<project>/`, client.json, bundle, manifest) and the agent contract (strict text / strict JSON modes, exit codes, recipe errors, `agent-context` + `doctor`); the command surface itself is discovered from the binary — `skmtc --help`, `skmtc <cmd> -h` — rather than carried in this skill. Use this skill when the user asks to "run skmtc", "generate code from an OpenAPI schema", "install a skmtc generator", "scaffold a skmtc project", "watch a skmtc project", "configure enrichments", "publish a stack", "deploy to skmtc-hub" (the command is `publish`; there is no `deploy`), "skmtc in CI", or invokes any CLI subcommand. For *authoring* a generator package (Projections, Snippets, transform functions), defer to `skmtc-generator`. When something is broken (no output, wrong output, error messages, a failed bundle build), verify before proposing a fix: read the manifest and the parse issues, and reproduce the failure first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MUST USE for ANY work on .py .pyi .rs .ts .tsx .mts .cts .go files. One philosophy: strict types, modern stacks (Pydantic v2 / serde+thiserror / Zod / gin+sqlc+pgx+slog), modern toolchains (uv+basedpyright+ruff / cargo+clippy+miri / Bun+Biome+tsc / gofumpt+golangci-lint v2+nilaway+go-race), parse-don't-validate, exhaustive match, typed errors, no any/unwrap/panic, 250 LOC ceiling, TDD. Routes to references/{python,rust,typescript,rust-ub,go}/. Triggers: write/edit Python/Rust/TypeScript/Go code, new project, gin server, bubbletea TUI, CJK IME, connect-go RPC, sqlc pgx, branded ids, exhaustive match, unsafe Rust, miri, oversized file, refactor, TDD, e2e test, arena, allocator, bumpalo, const fn, const generics, comptime, zero-alloc, bitfield, repr, scopeguard, errdefer, Zig-like, zerocopy, packed struct.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prospective failure imagination for a plan, decision, or running system. Operates in two modes — **plan mode** (a plan has not yet been committed to; imagine its catastrophic failure broadly) and **scenario mode** (a specific catastrophic scenario is posed against an existing system; investigate causes against the actual code and architecture). Spawns parallel pre-mortemers in isolation across three categories of lens: standard failure classes (technical, operational, estimation, scope, adoption, dependency, team, incentive, detection, reversibility, adversarial), 0-3 ad-hoc target-specific lenses the orchestrator names when warranted, and a first-principles lens that always runs to catch what the prescribed taxonomy misses. Synthesizes into a prioritized risk register with early-warning signals. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate implementation to Codex, grok, or cursor-agent, then review the diff, send it back to iterate, gate on the full test suite, and ship it as a PR. Use this whenever the user wants Codex, the grok 后端, or cursor-agent to write code, mentions handing off / delegating implementation to one of those backends, asks to work through a plan or spec unit-by-unit with an implementation backend doing the coding, or wants a review-and-merge loop wrapped around delegated output — and also when resuming such a loop ("keep going", "next unit", "继续下一个"). It encodes constraints that are expensive to rediscover: the implementer runs in the real environment behind backend-specific git and publication boundaries, must not be pointed at a full test suite by default, and its self-report is a claim rather than evidence. This loop expects an approved plan or an equivalently precise spec; settle an unsolved high-level goal into a plan first, using the engineering-mode skill when it is installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-pass structural code review with adversarial analysis, scope-aware dispatch, adversarial persona passes, and forced-finding protocol. Supports input modes: branch diff (default), PR number (#123), commit hash, pending changes (--pending). Use when asked to "review this PR", "code review", "pre-landing review", "check my diff", or "review #123". Proactively suggest when the user is about to merge or land code changes. NOT for behavioral verification against a running build (see mk:evaluate); NOT for post-implementation simplification (see mk:simplify).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when refining a draft user prompt before sending it to a coding agent. Decomposes goal/context/constraints/acceptance/output-format, detects ambiguity and model-coupled framing, then emits a model-agnostic rewrite. Supports --analyze, --score, and --deep. NOT for prompts from scratch (mk:brainstorming), plans/reviews (mk:elicit), implementation plans (mk:plan-creator), or general codebase scouting (mk:scout).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Predict RBP binding from RNA sequence using deep learning models (RBPNet sequence-to-signal, RNAProt RNN, GraphProt2 GCN with structure, DeepCLIP, DeepRiPe multi-modal CNN) for variant-effect prediction, in silico binding-site discovery, model interpretation, and transfer learning from CLIP and RBNS datasets. Use when computational prediction of RBP binding from sequence is needed, evaluating variant effects on binding without further wet-lab experiments, comparing model performance, or training a custom model on ENCODE eCLIP data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modelo de espaço de estados com complexidade O(n) versus O(n²) dos Transformers. Inferência 5× mais rápida, sequências de milhão de tokens, sem cache KV. SSM seletivo com design aware de hardware. Mamba-1 (d_state=16) e Mamba-2 (d_state=128, multi-head). Modelos 130M-2.8B no HuggingFace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rastreie experimentos de ML, gerencie registro de modelos com versionamento, implante modelos em produção e reproduza experimentos com MLflow - plataforma agnóstica a frameworks para ciclo de vida de ML

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reduza o tamanho de LLMs e acelere a inferência usando técnicas de pruning como Wanda e SparseGPT. Use para comprimir modelos sem retreinamento, alcançando 50% de esparsidade com perda mínima de acurácia, ou ativando inferência mais rápida em aceleradores de hardware. Cobre pruning não estruturado, pruning estruturado, esparsidade N:M, pruning por magnitude e métodos one-shot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Documentation] Use when (re)generating the DERIVED technical spec view over code + tests, or reporting canonical §8 TC/test-code drift. A GENERATOR — it projects code + tests into a regenerable per-component view and NEVER authors business content. Modes generate|audit|sync. Per-mode procedure lives in references/{author,sync}.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

マルチモデルオーケストレーションとモデル切り替え戦略。スコアベースのモデル選択、クロスエージェント委任（Gemini、Codex、Ollama）、アドバイザーペアリング、エスカレーション条件、権限マトリクス、およびコスト効率の最適化。

Generates immutable Dart data classes, sealed union types, and deep copyWith using Freezed (v3.2.x) with optional json_serializable integration. Use when creating DTOs, API response models, app state classes, or any model requiring immutability, pattern matching, or JSON serialization. Activates on: @freezed annotation, freezed_annotation import, immutable data class request, copyWith deep nesting, union/sealed types for loading/data/error states, generic response wrappers, or build_runner code generation for models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a code refactoring expert specializing in clean code principles, SOLID design patterns, and modern software engineering best practices. Analyze and refactor the provided code to improve its...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a code refactoring expert specializing in clean code principles, SOLID design patterns, and modern software engineering best practices. Analyze and refactor the provided code to improve its...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply modern web development best practices for security, compatibility, and code quality. Use when asked to "apply best practices", "security audit", "modernize code", "code quality review", or "check for vulnerabilities".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive the Codex in-app browser (open, navigate, click, type, screenshot, read page state) through the app's own node_repl runtime. Use when the session uses a custom (non-OpenAI) model, for example deepseek-v4-flash or mimo-v2.5, and the user asks to use the in-app browser, open or navigate a page in it, test a local app in a browser, or click, type, or take a screenshot in the Codex browser panel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a code refactoring expert specializing in clean code principles, SOLID design patterns, and modern software engineering best practices. Analyze and refactor the provided code to improve its quality, maintainability, and performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides migration of .NET Framework Thread.Abort usage to cooperative cancellation in modern .NET. USE FOR: modernizing code that calls Thread.Abort, catching ThreadAbortException, replacing Thread.ResetAbort, replacing Thread.Interrupt for thread termination, resolving PlatformNotSupportedException or SYSLIB0006 after retargeting to .NET 6+, migrating ASP.NET Response.End or Response.Redirect(url, true) which internally call Thread.Abort. DO NOT USE FOR: code that only uses Thread.Join, Thread.Sleep, or Thread.Start without any abort, interrupt, or ThreadAbortException usage — these APIs work identically in modern .NET and need no migration. Also not for projects staying on .NET Framework, or Thread.Abort usage inside third-party libraries you do not control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。