「code-review」の検索結果

Reviews code for bugs, style, and best practices. Use when reviewing PRs or checking code quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to review code. It supports both local changes (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). It focuses on correctness, maintainability, and adherence to project standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated code review for pull requests using specialized review patterns. Analyzes code for quality, security, performance, and best practices. Use when reviewing code changes, PRs, or doing code audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured code review covering style, readability, and security concerns with actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests or merge requests to identify issues and suggest improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing a Python feature, adding CLI commands, writing pytest suites, reviewing Python code, debugging, or refactoring. The primary Python engineering workflow orchestrator — classifies the task and delegates through this plugin's own specialist agents (architect → implement → test → review), sized to the task. Delegates to python-cli-architect (implementation), python-pytest-architect (tests), code-reviewer (review), python-cli-design-spec (architecture). Triggers on any Python task requiring specialist agent coordination or multi-agent execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews LLM integration, prompt templates, model selection, token/cost budgets, evaluation harnesses, structured outputs, retries, and streaming. Checks trust boundaries and task evidence against the selected provider/model contract rather than prescribing universal model tiers or sampling settings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for architecture review, dependency graphs, coupling analysis, or circular dependency detection. Establishes project module namespaces and traces imports plus Claude plugin hook, skill, script, PEP 723, and MCP boundaries. Emits partitioned Mermaid graphs with cycle, coupling, and ownership signals; verifies contract and consequence before assigning severity. Registers diagrams as codebase-analysis artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews Node.js runtime behavior in JavaScript or TypeScript, including server entrypoints, route handlers, middleware, streams, processes, dependencies, and environment configuration. Loads alongside language and CLI checks when applicable; investigates blocking I/O, backpressure, injection, lifecycle leaks, and misleading failure signals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews CLI application code for correctness and quality. Use when reviewing tools that use argparse, click, typer, commander.js, or similar argument parsers — covers exit codes, help flags, stdin/stdout/stderr separation, non-interactive operation, signal handling, argument validation, ANSI color safety, and dry-run support for destructive operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when user asks to review code for quality and security issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

库无关的Flutter/Dart代码审查清单，涵盖Widget最佳实践、状态管理模式（BLoC、Riverpod、Provider、GetX、MobX、Signals）、Dart惯用法、性能、可访问性、安全性和整洁架构。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review changed Anabasis v2 code for reuse, simplification, efficiency and altitude, then apply the fixes. Quality only: it hunts no bugs, which /code-review does. Starts from what the repository already finds (the lint plugins, the whole-tree census, the not-slop ledger), measures before and after with reduce-complexity's scripts, and holds a pass to its budgets and to the rules no pass trades. Use as /simplify on your own diff before a commit, or when the operator asks whether code is simple enough, why something exists, to go one layer higher, or to remove something and find another way.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive code review for agent iterations. Captures comments, tracks resolution status, and integrates with git diffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a holistic, human-reviewer-style critique of the currently staged Git changes (or, with `--working-copy`, of all uncommitted changes, with `--branch`, of a branch against its base, or, with `--commit`, of a single commit) and emit an approve/reject verdict with prioritized, severity-tagged, line-cited findings. Use when the user wants the staged diff, a branch, or a commit "reviewed", "critiqued", or "code-reviewed".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only for reviewing completed Biome PRs, branches, commit ranges, diffs, or working trees against business logic and requirements. Excludes broad code-quality and process audits, triage, reproduction, and implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full review lifecycle — request reviews, handle feedback with technical rigor, and complete branch integration. Use when completing tasks, receiving feedback, or finishing feature branches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Odoo addon code for correctness, security, performance, migrations, tests, and official Odoo coding guidelines. Use when reviewing Odoo modules, diffs, pull requests, or changed files involving models, fields, XML views, data, controllers, reports, OWL/assets, manifests, access rules, record rules, or OCA migrations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

用于审查已完成的工作、重大功能或合并前的变更，核对需求并按严重程度识别风险。未经审查不得合并。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a rigorous, forward-looking technical audit with severity ratings and improvement directions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for code/PR/diff review and refactor audits. Triggers: review this, before merge, antipattern, 리뷰, 코드 리뷰, 머지 전에 확인.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews code implementations for correctness, security, maintainability with confidence-scored findings (converted from agent)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic code review checklist and pre-commit quality gates for PRs. Use when: reviewing pull requests, checking code quality, before committing code. Keywords: review, PR, pull request, checklist, quality, commit, 審查, 檢查, 簽入.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

5つの専門エージェント（backend-reviewer, frontend-reviewer, test-reviewer, security-reviewer, ux-reviewer）がチームでコードレビューするスキル。 git diff ベースで変更ファイルを検出し、各専門家が並列でレビューして 統合レポート（Markdown）を docs/reviews/ に出力する。 Use when: コードレビューしたい、変更をレビュー、レビューチーム、 チームレビュー、実装をチェック、品質チェック。 Triggers: "レビュー", "review", "コードレビュー", "code review", "チームレビュー", "team review", "変更をチェック", "品質チェック"

Review a pull request end-to-end using GitHub CLI. Covers diff analysis, commit history review, CI/CD check verification, severity-leveled feedback (blocking/suggestion/nit/praise), and gh pr review submission. Use when a pull request is assigned for review, performing a self-review before requesting others' input, conducting a second review after feedback is addressed, or auditing a merged PR for post-merge quality assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。