「each」の検索結果

Generate prioritized CVE watchlists and actionable security recommendations for repositories. Use when analyzing CVE scan results, creating security reports, prioritizing vulnerability remediation, or generating security gate reports for CI/CD. Takes CVE scan results (JSON/SARIF from npm audit, pip-audit, Snyk), reachability analysis, and cutoff date as input. Combines severity, reachability, exploitability, and dependency criticality to rank CVEs by practical risk. Outputs markdown reports with concrete next-step guidance (immediate upgrade, monitor, ignore with justification, apply mitigation) suitable for issue trackers, security reviews, and CI security gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for test lifecycle hooks: beforeAll, afterAll, beforeEach, afterEach, fixtures, preload.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The telemetry each Active Directory technique generates and what alerts a defender: Kerberoasting produces Event 4769 with RC4 encryption (0x17) and an MDI alert, DCSync produces Event 4662 with the DS-Replication-Get-Changes GUID, AS-REP roasting produces Event 4768 with no pre-auth, LSASS dumping is blocked by EDR, plus a lateral-movement telemetry table by protocol (SMB/WMI/WinRM/RDP/DCOM). Use this whenever you run or plan an offensive AD technique and need to know what noise it makes, when writing the engagement's detection notes, or when a defender wants to know what to monitor. Teaches red teamers what is loud and blue teamers what to watch. Standard-tooling knowledge, no vendor engine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Logician. Use when a task calls for Logician judgment. Reasons from syntax-versus-semantics and object-versus-metalanguage discipline, the ⊢/⊨ distinction, and matching each logic to its intended semantics through natural deduction and sequent calculus (cut-elimination, subformula property), compactness and Löwenheim–Skolem, forcing and diagonalization, and proof assistants (Lean 4/mathlib, Coq, Isabelle/HOL, Agda) with Z3/CVC5/Vampire/Mace4 automation while treating use–mention conflation, second-order misuse of compactness, mis-stated incompleteness hypotheses (ω-consistency vs consistency), and Gödel philosophical overreach as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A three-surface marketing system organized around alternating black, white, and PlayStation Blue chapters that scroll past the viewer like a console launch trailer. Each section has a single editorial purpose — hero photography, console product render, PS Plus tier callout, news strip — and each owns one of three full-bleed canvas modes. The chrome is unusually quiet for a gaming brand: bright PlayStation Blue (`#0070d1`) carries every primary CTA as a fully-rounded pill, the proprietary SST face renders display copy at a signature weight 300 (light) for an airy, premium feel, and a crisp 8px-radius secondary card system carries product info on either canvas mode. The system never decorates — no gradient backgrounds on chrome, no atmospheric mesh, no drop shadows beyond a faint section-divide. Imagery does all the heavy lifting: console glamour shots, game key art, and PS Plus tier illustrations occupy 60-90% of every section, with copy compressed into a small editorial slot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module, with implementation hidden in subfolders and reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teach the user a new skill or concept, within this workspace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the knowledge/ base and the .claude/ skills, agents and workflows for staleness, self-contradiction, and drift from their own stated rules — four independent adversarial auditors (two lenses over two trees) verify every load-bearing claim against the current tree, cross-examine each other within their tree, and reach a consensus on if/what needs changing. Use periodically, after a run of deliveries that changed build config, target layout or the skills themselves, or whenever you suspect the docs have aged out of true.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain a body of work plainly so a person actually understands it. Runs the `how` and `why` skills and weaves what they find into one clear explanation. Use for 'teach me this', 'help me really understand X', 'explain this change or subsystem to me'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply to multi-step work (sweeps, migrations, runs of similar edits) and to how you stack commits and PRs. Break work into small units that each end in a verifiable state, check each before the next, and order delivery so the sequence proves itself to a reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when debugging. Trace each symptom to its root cause and fix it there; reproduce first, ask why until you reach it, resist nil-check guards that silence crashes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft professional emails for various business scenarios with appropriate tone and structure. Use when a user asks to write an email, compose a message, draft a reply, write a follow-up, create an outreach email, respond to a client, write a cold email, or craft any professional correspondence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in course platform selection and implementation - comparing Teachable, Kajabi, Thinkific, and custom solutions. Covers LMS selection criteria, platform migrations, tech stack decisions, and building vs buying. Use when "course platform, lms, teachable, kajabi, thinkific, course hosting, learning management system, which platform, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan 8-type / 3-category leakage taxonomy; the illegitimate-proxy / sampling-bias / pretraining-contamination subtypes hand off as needs_external_check, naming but NEVER running Oren-2023 exchangeability / Shi-2023 Min-K% / Golchin-2023 Time-Travel / BIG-bench canary); a load-bearing LLM judge is conflicted (same model/family as a compared system) or unvalidated (no human-agreement, no bias control) (HP-JUDGE-VALIDITY); a declared condition/metric is dropped or switched to favor the method, or 'best' is chosen with no held-out set (HP-SELECTIVE-REPORTING). Verdict-bearing at L0/L1 from the DESCRIBED protocol — NOT repo-gated like experiment-forensics; L2 only CONFIRMS against split/preprocessing/result files. A fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per pass) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Leakage and under-reporting are usually HONEST methodological errors — every finding describes a discrepancy to CHECK, never an accusation. An LLM generating GROUND-TRUTH labels is HP-FAKE-GT (experiment-forensics) — routed there, not here. Emits eval-design-forensics.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "eval design audit", "evaluation validity", "train/test leakage", "data leakage", "is the score measuring generalization", "LLM judge bias", "is the judge validated", "selective reporting", "cherry-picked results", "评估设计审计", "评测有效性", "数据泄漏", "训练测试集泄漏", "裁判模型有没有验证", "选择性报告".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Axiom — First-Principles Assumption Auditor / 第一性原理拆解器 workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs First-principles assumption auditor. Classifies each hidden assumption (fact / convention / belief / interest-driven), ranks by fragility × impact, and rebuilds conclusions from verified premises. Bilingual: auto-detects Chinese or English and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Axiom — First-Principles Assumption Auditor / 第一性原理拆解器 workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs First-principles assumption auditor. Classifies each hidden assumption (fact / convention / belief / interest-driven), ranks by fragility × impact, and rebuilds conclusions from verified premises. Bilingual: auto-detects Chinese or English and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

B2B 大客户销售 (B2B 大客户销售 / 企业级复杂销售 (Enterprise B2B Sales / Complex Selling) — 面向企业客户的高价值、长周期、多干系人复杂销售的职业认知操作系统，从业者(AE/客户经理/SE 售前/销售负责人 VP Sales/CRO)、想入行者、以及服务这行(销售咨询/enablement/RevOps)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 三大方法论流派之争: **买方主导的诊断式提问 (consultative/discovery-led: SPIN 提问 → 痛点 → 方案, 「像医生先诊断再开方」) ⇄ 卖方主导的教学式挑战 (Challenger: Teach-Tailor-Take control, 用商业洞见 reframe 客户认知, 「像老师挑战客户的既有想法」) ⇄ 资格审查纪律 (MEDDIC/MEDDPICC: 先严格 qualify/disqualify, 「no deal 好过 bad deal」)**; 三派不是非此即彼, 资深人混用, 但底层世界观分歧真实(问 vs 教 vs 筛); 更深层张力 — 「过程/方法论纪律 (process rigor: 预测准确、deal inspection、qualify) ⇄ 关系/信任 (relationship: champion 培养、高管关系、人情)」, 「卖结果/业务价值 (business outcome/ROI、卖给经济决策人) ⇄ 卖产品/功能 (feature selling)」, 「多线程触达买方委员会 (multithreading buying committee) ⇄ 单一 champion 依赖」; (b) 方法论正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量+CLI 化) — MEDDIC/MEDDPICC (Metrics 量化指标/Economic buyer 经济决策人/Decision Criteria 决策标准/Decision Process 决策流程/Identify Pain 痛点/Champion 内部拥护者 + Paper process 签约流程/Competition 竞争), SPIN (Situation/Problem/Implication/Need-payoff 提问序列), Challenger (商业洞见 commercial insight + reframe + 建设性张力 constructive tension + Mobilizer 调动者), Solution Selling (痛点链 pain chain/愿景创建/buying vision), Sandler (前置合约 up-front contract/痛苦漏斗 pain funnel/潜艇七步), Command of the Message (Force Management: 业务价值框架/before-after/decision criteria), Gap Selling (Keenan: 现状 current state → 期望 future state → 差距 the gap/问题中心), Miller Heiman Strategic Selling (蓝表 blue sheet/buying influences: 经济/用户/技术买家 + coach), Value Selling, BANT (老式资格框架, 多被 MEDDIC 取代); (c) 行业结构与角色 — SDR/BDR (开发/约见) → AE/客户经理 (成交) → SE/售前/Solutions Engineer (技术验证/POC/demo) → CSM (客户成功/续约扩张) → Sales Manager/VP Sales/CRO; RevOps (收入运营), Sales Enablement (赋能); land and expand (先落地再扩张)、量化指标 quota/OTE(目标总收入)/配额达成率/pipeline coverage(管道覆盖率 ~3x 业内经验法则)/win rate(赢率)/sales velocity(销售速度)/ramp time(爬坡期)/ACV·ARR·NRR(年合同额/年经常性收入/净收入留存); (d) 销售周期 (the deal/opportunity lifecycle) — prospecting 开发 → discovery 需求挖掘 → qualification 资格审查(MEDDIC) → demo/technical validation/POC 技术验证 → business case/value 业务价值与 ROI → proposal 提案 → negotiation 谈判(procurement 采购/法务/security review) → close 成交 → onboarding/expansion 交付与扩张; 干系人: champion 拥护者 vs coach 线人 vs economic buyer 经济决策人 vs blocker 阻碍者; mutual action plan/close plan(双向行动计划/成交计划); (e) 产出物与节奏 — discovery call(需求电话)、demo、business case、proposal/SOW、MAP(mutual action plan)、forecast(预测: commit/best case/pipeline 类别)、pipeline review/deal review/QBR(季度业务回顾)/account plan(客户计划); (f) 职业/招聘/薪酬 — quota/OTE/comp plan(底薪+提成)/accelerator(加速器)/SPIFF/clawback、ramp、President's Club(顶尖销售俱乐部)、SDR→AE→管理 晋升路径、rep turnover(销售流失率高); (g) 争议/批判 — Challenger 是否过誉(CEB 原始数据被质疑、insight selling 批评)、MEDDIC 沦为填表剧场(box-checking theater, 填字段不真 qualify)、活动指标 vs 质量(spray-and-pray 群发/冷电话存废之争)、AI SDR/自动化淹没收件箱(2024-2025 AI BDR 泡沫 + 邮件送达率崩溃 backlash)、SDR 军团模式是否将死(Winning by Design/signal-based GTM 取代)、配额虚高与销售 burnout、季末打折促单、销售方法论的「宗教化」与培训-认证产业链、最大竞争对手其实是「no decision/维持现状」而非对手; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 提问诊断派(Rackham SPIN/Bosworth&Eades Solution Selling/Keenan Gap Selling) vs 挑战教学派(Dixon&Adamson Challenger/Force Management Command of the Message) vs 资格纪律派(MEDDIC: Napoli&Dunkel 起源/John McMahon/MEDDICC Andy Whyte) vs 关系战略派(Miller Heiman Strategic/Large Account) vs SaaS 现代收入架构派(Aaron Ross Predictable Revenue/Mark Roberge Sales Acceleration Formula/Jacco van der Kooij Winning by Design bowtie/David Skok 指标) vs 开发-心态派(Jeb Blount Fanatical Prospecting/Sales EQ、Anthony Iannarino、Josh Braun) vs 谈判(Chris Voss Never Split the Difference 战术同理心)。不含: B2C/零售/电商导购销售、纯电话客服/客户支持、纯渠道/分销管理(channel 虽相关但聚焦直销复杂销售)、纯 marketing/需求生成(demand gen 虽上游但本 skill 聚焦销售执行)、纯 CSM 客户成功(虽相关但聚焦 new logo + expansion 的销售动作)。) Master OS — automated mastery of B2B 大客户销售 / 企业级复杂销售 (Enterprise B2B Sales / Complex Selling) — 面向企业客户的高价值、长周期、多干系人复杂销售的职业认知操作系统，从业者(AE/客户经理/SE 售前/销售负责人 VP Sales/CRO)、想入行者、以及服务这行(销售咨询/enablement/RevOps)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 三大方法论流派之争: **买方主导的诊断式提问 (consultative/discovery-led: SPIN 提问 → 痛点 → 方案, 「像医生先诊断再开方」) ⇄ 卖方主导的教学式挑战 (Challenger: Teach-Tailor-Take control, 用商业洞见 reframe 客户认知, 「像老师挑战客户的既有想法」) ⇄

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

调香师与香水 (调香师 / 香水 (Perfumery & Fragrance) — 香水创作与香气调配的职业认知操作系统，从业者/调香师/评香师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (原料知识/香料化学/嗅觉家族分类/accord 和弦/配方结构 %/挥发度金字塔/IFRA 法规) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (嗅觉记忆/闻香训练/「the nose」/创作直觉/盲嗅识别)，这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的原料与公式」与「不可言传的嗅觉记忆与品味」之间，嗅觉记忆是极致 tacit 技能; (b) 法系传统 vs 分子/合成派 — 法国 Grasse 天然香料 + haute parfumerie 艺术传统 (天然精油/原精/学徒制) vs 现代分子派 (aroma chemicals 香基/captives 专利分子/headspace 顶空捕香/功能香精)，两套对「香水是什么」的世界观; (c) 培养/传承 — ISIPCA (凡尔赛香水学校) + 四大香精公司内部调香学校 (Givaudan/Firmenich(DSM-Firmenich)/IFF/Symrise) + 学徒制 + 「鼻子」tacit 校准; 角色分工: perfumer(parfumeur 调香师) vs evaluator(评香师) vs flavorist(食用香精师); (d) 行业结构 — 四大香精公司寡头 (Givaudan/DSM-Firmenich/IFF/Symrise) + Mane/Robertet/Takasago，为品牌做 B2B 命题创作 (the brief → creation → mods 模型); vs niche/indie 小众独立香水 (artisanal/直营); 天然 (Grasse/精油) vs 合成 (香基/captives) 的成本与可持续之争; (e) 创作层 — 香调金字塔 (top/heart/base notes 前中后调)、accord 和弦、配方 (酒精中 % 浓度)、浓度分级 (parfum/EDP/EDT/EDC)、调香师的「香风琴」orgue、trials/mods 试样迭代、weighing 称量精度; (f) 法规与安全 — IFRA standards (原料限用)、EU 致敏原标签 (26→80+ allergens)、REACH、橡苔/atranol 限用、经典香水 (Mitsouko/Chanel No.5) 因法规被迫重配 (reformulation) 与创作自由之张力; (g) 评价/批评 — Luca Turin & Tania Sanchez (《Perfumes: The Guide》《The Secret of Scent》气味的科学)、香评人、Fragrantica/Basenotes 社区、vintage vs reformulation 之争、niche vs designer 之争。学派分歧: 法系天然传统派 vs 分子合成派、天然纯粹派 vs 合成实用派、haute parfumerie/niche 艺术派 vs mass designer 商业派、「鼻子=艺术家」vs「调香师=香气工程师/技师」、嗅觉科学之争 (Luca Turin 振动理论 vs 主流形状/受体理论)。不含: 香薰蜡烛/家居香氛纯生产营销、芳香疗法健康宣称 (aromatherapy)、纯化妆品配方学 (超出香精范畴)、DIY 家用香氛套件、精油传销/MLM。) Master OS — automated mastery of 调香师 / 香水 (Perfumery & Fragrance) — 香水创作与香气调配的职业认知操作系统，从业者/调香师/评香师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (原料知识/香料化学/嗅觉家族分类/accord 和弦/配方结构 %/挥发度金字塔/IFRA 法规) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (嗅觉记忆/闻香训练/「the nose」/创作直觉/盲嗅识别)，这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的原料与公式」与「不可言传的嗅觉记忆与品味」之间，嗅觉记忆是极致 tacit 技能; (b) 法系传统 vs 分子/合成派 — 法国 Grasse 天然香料 + haute parfumerie 艺术传统 (天然精油/原精/学徒制) vs 现代分子派 (aroma chemicals 香基/captives 专利分子/headspace 顶空捕香/功能香精)，两套对「香水是什么」的世界观; (c) 培养/传承 — ISIPCA (凡尔赛香水学校) + 四大香精公司内部调香学校 (Givaudan/Firmenich(DSM-Firmenich)/IFF/Symrise) + 学徒制 + 「鼻子」tacit 校准; 角色分工: perfumer(parfumeur 调香师) vs evaluator(评香师) vs flavorist(食用香精师); (d) 行业结构 — 四大香精公司寡头 (Givaudan/DSM-Firmenich/IFF/Symrise) + Mane/Robertet/Takasago，为品牌做 B2B 命题创作 (the brief → creation → mods 模型); vs niche/indie 小众独立香水 (artisanal/直营); 天然 (Grasse/精油) vs 合成 (香基/captives) 的成本与可持续之争; (e) 创作层 — 香调金字塔 (top/heart/base notes 前中后调)、accord 和弦、配方 (酒精中 % 浓度)、浓度分级 (parfum/EDP/EDT/EDC)、调香师的「香风琴」orgue、trials/mods 试样迭代、weighing 称量精度; (f) 法规与安全 — IFRA standards (原料限用)、EU 致敏原标签 (26→80+ allergens)、REACH、橡苔/atranol 限用、经典香水 (Mitsouko/Chanel No.5) 因法规被迫重配 (reformulation) 与创作自由之张力; (g) 评价/批评 — Luca Turin & Tania Sanchez (《Perfumes: The Guide》《The Secret of Scent》气味的科学)、香评人、Fragrantica/Basenotes 社区、vintage vs reformulation 之争、niche vs designer 之争。学派分歧: 法系天然传统派 vs 分子合成派、天然纯粹派 vs 合成实用派、haute parfumerie/niche 艺术派 vs mass designer 商业派、「鼻子=艺术家」vs「调香师=香气工程师/技师」、嗅觉科学之争 (Luca Turin 振动理论 vs 主流形状/受体理论)。不含: 香薰蜡烛/家居香氛纯生产营销、芳香疗法健康宣称 (aromatherapy)、纯化妆品配方学 (超出香精范畴)、DIY 家用香氛套件、精油传销/MLM。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on 调香师 / 香水 (Perfumery & Fragrance) — 香水创作与香气调配的职业认知操作系统，从业者/调香师/评香师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (原料知识/香料化学/嗅觉家族分类/accord 和弦/配方结构 %/挥发度金字塔/IFRA 法规) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (嗅觉记忆/闻香训练/「the nose」/创作直觉/盲嗅识别)，这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的原料与公式」与「不可言传的嗅觉记忆与品味」之间，嗅觉记忆是极致 tacit 技能; (b) 法系传统 vs 分子/合成派 — 法国 Grasse 天然香料 + haute parfumerie 艺术传统 (天然精油/原精/学徒制) vs 现代分子派 (aroma chemicals 香基/captives 专利分子/headspace 顶空捕香/功能香精)，两套对「香水是什么」的世界观; (c) 培养/传承 — ISIPCA (凡尔赛香水学校) + 四大香精公司内部调香学校 (Givaudan/Firmenich(DSM-Firmenich)/IFF/Symrise) + 学徒制 + 「鼻子」tacit 校准; 角色分工: perfumer(parfumeur 调香师) vs evaluator(评香师) vs flavorist(食用香精师); (d) 行业结构 — 四大香精公司寡头 (Givaudan/DSM-Firmenich/IFF/Symrise) + Mane/Robertet/Takasago，为品牌做 B2B 命题创作 (the brief → creation → mods 模型); vs niche/indie 小众独立香水 (artisanal/直营); 天然 (Grasse/精油) vs 合成 (香基/captives) 的成本与可持续之争; (e) 创作层 — 香调金字塔 (top/heart/base notes 前中后调)、ac

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive codebase orientation for a HUMAN who wants to learn the code. Runs the same tree-sitting + featuring pipeline as exploring-codebases but synthesizes it into guided exercises and an HTML teaching artifact rather than an analysis document. Use for "orient me to this repo", "teach me this codebase", "walk me through this code", "learning orientation", or when someone wants genuine comprehension rather than a task completed. The audience is the test: if nobody is being taught and the goal is to get work done, use exploring-codebases instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teach the user a new skill or concept, within this workspace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when 王建硕 wants to systematically improve his X (Twitter) content by iterating on the content-generation prompt (prompts/x/prompt.md, used by the every-6h tweet Action) and finding which prompt version produces the highest-reach tweets. Each prompt edit is a git-SHA-versioned, numbered experiment with a hypothesis; tweets are attributed to the version live at post time and judged on median impressions per tweet. Also mines per-tweet impression data for content-feature signals (angle / length / topic) that feed the next prompt edit. North-star = impressions per tweet. Triggers — "改 X 的 prompt", "X 内容改进", "哪版 prompt 最好", "什么内容 impression 高", "improve my tweets", "A/B test the X prompt", "/wjs-x-improving-content".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, review, and improve skills for Pi agents. A skill is a folder with a SKILL.md that teaches an agent specialized workflows, domain knowledge, or tool integrations. Use when asked to create a new skill, improve an existing skill, review a skill for quality, scaffold a skill from a workflow, or convert documentation into a skill. Also triggers on "make a skill for", "build a skill", "skill for [topic]", "teach the agent to", or "package this workflow as a skill".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。