1,235 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Design waiting experiences — spinners, skeletons, optimistic updates, and progressive reveal. Use when content takes time to arrive. For the latency budget itself use `doherty-threshold`; for success confirmation use `feedback-patterns`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design confirmations, status updates, and notifications that tell users an action registered. Use when the system must acknowledge success or change. For waiting states use `loading-states`; for failures use `error-handling-ux`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enables Redshift system-table (SYS_*) log publishing to S3 Tables in Apache Iceberg format for both Provisioned clusters and Serverless namespaces, verifies publishing status, and queries the published logs via any Iceberg-compatible engine including Redshift and Athena. Covers system tables such as sys_query_history, sys_query_text, sys_connection_log, sys_query_detail, and sys_session_history. Applies when turning on S3 Tables log publishing for a cluster or namespace, confirming publishing status and locating the S3 Tables namespace, querying non-realtime data from Redshift system tables off-cluster at scale, or building dashboards for Redshift monitoring and auditing, especially for historical or high-volume system-table data beyond the in-cluster SYS_ view retention window. Trigger phrases: publish redshift system table log to s3 tables, enable-logging s3 tables, describe redshift logging status, query redshift system tables in athena or redshift, redshift log exports to iceberg.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides authoritative guidance on Amazon Neptune Database and Neptune Analytics for graph, knowledge-graph, and relationship-heavy workloads — fraud detection / fraud rings, agentic memory / chatbot context across sessions, recommendations, identity resolution, Gremlin / openCypher / SPARQL queries, supernode / slow traversal, Neo4j to Neptune migration / APOC compatibility, Neptune Database vs Analytics engine selection, PageRank / community detection, GraphRAG, and connectivity from Lambda / EC2 / applications. Creates and modifies Neptune Database clusters/instances and Neptune Analytics graphs on explicit user confirmation; blocks destructive operations (delete, reset-graph, failover, major upgrade) and redirects to change-control.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tests Amazon MWAA workflow execution end-to-end: trigger a run and monitor it to completion for Provisioned (Python DAG, via Airflow REST API) and Serverless (YAML workflow, via StartWorkflowRun). Verifies the artifact is deployed and parse-ready, triggers with confirmation, polls to terminal state, and on failure delegates diagnosis to debugging-mwaa-workflow and artifact/redeploy fixes to authoring-mwaa-workflow, then retests up to a capped number of attempts. Triggers on: test my DAG, test my workflow, run my DAG, trigger a test run, does my DAG work, smoke-test the pipeline, verify my workflow runs, execute my DAG to check it. Not applicable to writing or deploying a new workflow (handled by authoring-mwaa-workflow), or for diagnosing why a run failed or root-causing an error (handled by debugging-mwaa-workflow).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Org-grade attack-surface mapping: given a company's legal identity, discover its ENTIRE owned internet footprint — corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets — with attribution discipline, not just DNS breadth. The org-first attribution pyramid (legal entity -> LEI/registration -> corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets). Corporate-identity resolution via the GLEIF LEI API (legal name -> LEI, exact-LEI direct-children expansion, downward-only depth-capped BFS, NEVER a name re-resolution), SEC-EDGAR full-text search + Exhibit-21 subsidiary entity names, OpenCorporates entity corroboration, Wikidata SPARQL corporate graph (P856/P355/P749/P1830). Domain attribution via reverse-WHOIS (WhoisXML preview-then-purchase quota guard, SecurityTrails associated-domains — both paid), crt.sh O= certificate-transparency organization pivot (keyless), infrastructure correlation (shared NS/MX/SaaS-TXT, netblock membership, reverse-DNS PTR), and the independent-evidence combiner (1-prod(1-w_i), rule of three, OwnerTier NONE/WEAK/MODERATE/STRONG/CONFIRMED) — discover-only `related:` candidates are NEVER auto-scanned. Netblock/ASN attribution via org-first RIR queries (ARIN Whois-RWS org-handle search, RIPE DB organisation + inverse-org search) that recover 'dark netblocks' with no DNS link to the seed, ASN discovery (RIPEstat + BGPView union), the HYPERSCALER-SCOPE GUARD (never attribute a whole AWS/GCP/Azure/Cloudflare announced range to a tenant — keep only the seed-containing block, tag shared_hosting_cdn), and org-identity-seeded internet-scan-index queries (Shodan/Censys/ZoomEye/FOFA/BinaryEdge org: filters + an always-on keyless crt.sh fallback). Promote-to-scan triage ranks forgotten discover-only netblocks by remote-access exposure (gateway-vendor/KEV/control-plane/datastore port scoring) into an operator queue. Attribution confidence rubric + anti-patterns (namesake grafting via GLEIF name re-resolution, single-signal ownership, hyperscaler over-attribution, privacy-WHOIS pivot poisoning, RIR org-name collisions). Passive/keyless-first OSINT only — every paid-key dependency is enrichment on top of a keyless core, never a hard requirement. Use when mapping an organization's full corporate-family internet footprint, resolving a legal entity to its LEI/subsidiaries, discovering domains/netblocks/ASNs an org owns beyond its one seed domain, auditing M&A/shadow-IT sprawl, or scoping an engagement that starts from a company NAME rather than a domain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read-only access to local WeChat chats through rion-wechat-cli, plus a guided first-access workflow when the user asks to connect their own account or obtain its local database keys. Use for chat search, contact history and unsent reply drafts; acquisition requires separate confirmation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advanced prototype pollution playbook — server-side RCE, client-side gadgets, filter bypasses, and detection techniques. Companion to ../prototype-pollution/ for basics. Use when you've confirmed pollution and need to escalate to code execution or find framework-specific gadgets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design the small details -- triggers, rules, feedback, loops and modes -- that separate good products from great ones. Use when the user mentions "microinteraction", "button feedback", "loading state", "toggle design", "animation detail", "state transitions", "input feedback", "the interface feels dead", "make the UI feel responsive", or "add polish to interactions". Also trigger when designing form-validation responses, progress indicators, confirmation dialogs, or any element where the user expects immediate feedback. Covers trigger design, state rules, feedback mechanisms, and progressive loops. For overall UI polish, see refactoring-ui. For affordance design, see design-everyday-things.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run verification commands and confirm output before claiming success
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Uninstall or hard-clean OpenClaw Companion, Windows node, native Gateway/MXC, WSL Gateway, and managed llama.cpp/Local AI state for a clean retest. Choose the existing dev CLI uninstall or the reviewed hard-clean procedure, inventory exact targets, and obtain destructive confirmation before acting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Package, publish, and distribute DeepSeek Harness (DSH) plugins — npm pack artifact validation, GitHub/npm/hub release-track selection, tarball overrides installs for the unpublished cohort (0.1.2-alpha.*), and CI/release gates with rollback. Use when publishing a plugin, packing a tarball, wiring a plugin into a profile/hub, or installing an alpha version that is not on npm; show a plan and obtain user confirmation before any publish action.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for DSH plugin compatibility, migration, upgrade, regression, or post-upgrade diagnosis, including read-only review of already-migrated plugin source and version-boundary, API, dependency, activation, or runtime compatibility problems. Inspection and diagnosis stay read-only; show a plan and obtain confirmation before any configuration, dependency, or source write.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build safe, local, defensive reproductions of ALREADY-PATCHED, publicly disclosed security vulnerabilities (CVEs, vendor advisories, AI-agent incidents) for whitepapers, control testing, and education. Use this skill whenever the user wants to reproduce, demonstrate, or write up a known vulnerability or security incident — phrases like "reproduce this CVE", "build a repro for", "demonstrate the EchoLeak/Cursor/postmark-mcp issue", "show how this exploit worked", "add a reproducibility guide", or "pull the NVD/CVE details for". It fetches advisory metadata from NVD and CVE.org, confirms the issue is fixed, and produces a vulnerable-vs-patched harness that is offline, loopback-only, and uses synthetic markers. It NEVER discovers, develops, or weaponizes new zero-days and refuses any unpatched or live-target request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs the loop from discovering a weakness to confirming it is fixed — scanning, triage, prioritization by real exploitability, remediation tracking, and patch policy. Use this to stand up or fix a vulnerability program, triage scanner output, decide what to fix first, set patch SLAs, handle a disclosure from an outside researcher, or report posture to leadership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verifies that work is actually complete before it is claimed to be — running the checks, reading the output, and confirming the original request was satisfied rather than approximated. Use this before saying something is done, fixed, or passing; before committing or opening a pull request; and whenever a claim of success has not been backed by command output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Finds out whether a problem is real and a solution would work, before building it — recruiting the right people, interviewing without leading them, separating what users say from what they do, naming the riskiest assumption and testing that one first, and reaching a decision rather than a summary. Use this to validate a problem, test an idea cheaply, decide whether to build something, or fix a discovery process that keeps confirming what the team already believed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs a security incident from detection to closure — triage, containment, investigation, communication, and the review afterward. Use this when a compromise is suspected or confirmed, when preparing an incident response plan or running an exercise, when deciding whether something is an incident, or when a breach may trigger notification obligations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decides how the business is financed and what that financing then requires of it — debt versus equity, weighted average cost of capital as a hurdle rate, how much leverage cash flow can carry, and the financial, affirmative and negative covenants, definitions, test dates and cure rights that come attached. Use this to evaluate a financing option, set an investment hurdle, check whether a planned decision will trip a covenant, or work out what a lender can do when one breaks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Open new browser tab and navigate to URL (keeps current page open). When you need to open additional page without closing current, or multi-task across pages. PREREQUISITE - must confirm browser is running first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
1. Confirm the user objective, required inputs, and non-negotiable constraints before doing detailed work. 2. Validate that the request matches the documented scope and stop early if the task would require unsupported as.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when evaluating Nicolas Darvas-style box breakouts, new-high momentum, volume confirmation, and mechanical stop placement for liquid growth stocks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when evaluating Paul Tudor Jones-style macro trend trades: major turning points, trend confirmation, risk control, stop discipline, liquidity, and not losing big.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。