「observability」の検索結果

Design dashboards for migrations and runtimes. Use for authority drift, verifier status, burn-down, runtime health, or pain panels. NOT for vanity analytics, ad hoc charts, or duplicate reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building Grafana dashboards backed by Prometheus, Loki, or Tempo, designing PromQL/LogQL queries, wiring template variables, setting alert rules, building SLO dashboards, or maintaining dashboards as code. Triggers: rate() vs increase() confusion, irate vs rate, label_replace, recording rules, alerting rule expressions, multi-dimensional template variables, ad-hoc filters, dashboard JSON model, provisioning via Terraform/grafonnet, p99 / histogram_quantile usage. NOT for Datadog/New Relic dashboards (vendor-specific), Grafana plugin development, or Loki ingestion pipeline tuning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implementing distributed tracing with W3C Trace Context — the byte-precise `traceparent` and `tracestate` header formats, OpenTelemetry's W3CTraceContextPropagator as the modern default (replacing X-B3-* and X-Datadog-*), head vs tail sampling, and HTTP→SQL trace propagation via sqlcommenter. Grounded in the W3C REC and OpenTelemetry specs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Traces complete execution paths through DAG workflows. Records timing, inputs, outputs, and state transitions for all nodes. Activate on 'execution trace', 'trace execution', 'execution path', 'debug execution', 'execution log'. NOT for performance analysis (use dag-performance-profiler) or failure investigation (use dag-failure-analyzer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Profiles DAG execution performance including latency, token usage, cost, and resource consumption. Identifies bottlenecks and optimization opportunities. Activate on 'performance profile', 'execution metrics', 'latency analysis', 'token usage', 'cost analysis'. NOT for execution tracing (use dag-execution-tracer) or failure analysis (use dag-failure-analyzer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Learns from DAG execution history to improve future performance. Identifies successful patterns, detects anti-patterns, and provides recommendations. Activate on 'learn patterns', 'execution patterns', 'what worked', 'optimize based on history', 'pattern analysis'. NOT for failure analysis (use dag-failure-analyzer) or performance profiling (use dag-performance-profiler).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs root cause analysis on DAG execution failures. Traces failure propagation, identifies systemic issues, and generates actionable remediation guidance. Activate on 'failure analysis', 'root cause', 'why did it fail', 'debug failure', 'error investigation'. NOT for execution tracing (use dag-execution-tracer) or performance issues (use dag-performance-profiler).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when wrangler deploys silently fail or produce wrong artifacts, secrets upload as empty strings, custom domain DNS is not resolving, route assignment broke after rename, observability/tail logs are needed, D1/KV/R2 bindings are missing, OAuth scope errors block a command, cookies on a redirect are not attaching, or the worker exceeds CPU time. Triggers: "Tenant or user not found", "Authentication error" on wrangler d1 push, secret length is 0 after upload, route returns origin not worker, "compatibility_date too old", 1101 errors, custom_domain assignment lost on script rename. NOT for AWS Lambda / Vercel Edge / Deno Deploy (different runtimes), Cloudflare Zero Trust, or R2-specific tuning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides Quarkus development across REST APIs, CDI dependency injection, Hibernate ORM, Panache, configuration, OpenAPI, templates, messaging, security, observability, packaging, and tooling. Use when building Quarkus applications, adding endpoints or clients, configuring datasources or OIDC, debugging build or runtime issues, or choosing extensions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and implement infrastructure, CI/CD, container, deployment, observability, and operational configuration changes with least privilege, staged validation, and rollback awareness. Use for pipelines, infrastructure as code, Kubernetes, containers, release automation, monitoring, and production-readiness work; do not use to perform destructive production actions without explicit authorization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for a multi-agent .NET code review - five parallel reviewers (correctness, performance, security/observability, data/messaging/integration, generalist) plus an adversarial maintainer that refutes weak findings. Requires the review agent roles registered by scripts/install-codex.sh. Keywords: dotnet review pipeline, multi-agent review, parallel reviewers, maintainer pushback, review this branch, cynical review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing PRs/diffs/branches/documents for .NET quality, correctness, performance, security, data access, messaging, and observability. Includes adversarial critical-thinking mode for skeptical/cynical review requests. Keywords: code review, review PR, review diff, critical review, cynical review, adversarial review, production readiness, low GC, AOT, security review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cloud guardrails for any vendor workload — Google Cloud (GCP, Vertex AI, GKE), AWS (IAM, EKS, Bedrock), Azure (Entra ID, Policy, AKS), Alibaba Cloud (RAM, mainland/international residency). Enforces identity least-privilege, mechanical policy, data boundaries, residency, cost caps, network egress and observability, with official-source validation before any claim. Trigger on any cloud infrastructure design, review, Terraform plan, or LLM/agent deployment; the-architect routes here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when establishing what observability a project actually has — the four Golden Signals, required signal to detected implementation to evidence, and SLI/SLO provenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing monitoring dashboards — visualization selection, layout principles, observability strategies (RED/USE/Golden Signals), and data storytelling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when filling knowledge-layer context files — auth-model, tenant-boundaries, data-sensitivity, deployment-order, observability — interactive template walkthrough.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Architecture] Use when grading project architecture and scalability quality for greenfield init or brownfield audit: build/CI scalability, distributed-monolith risk, module isolation, dependency discipline, loose coupling, horizontal scaling, DRY, abstraction, clean architecture, observability, and delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to MEASURE this repo instead of eyeballing it — interpret the loop-station context-budget trend (history.jsonl, thresholds, the tokenizer-switch gotcha), read a session trace, use the eval ledger (cost-per-success), and pick the right evidence tool (app-shots, smoke-deployed, db-counts, --check modes). Use when asked "is the harness bloating", "how big is CLAUDE.md really", "did this agent run actually succeed", "prove this works", "what evidence do we have", or when tempted to declare a capability (browser, tool) unavailable. For RUNNING the loop-station scripts, defer to the loop-station skill — this skill is interpretation + the wider evidence toolkit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting to production code, or when a past incident lacks diagnostic data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reusable skill for coding agents (Claude, GPT, etc.) to build, optimize, debug, and productionize AI agents and coding agents in Rust. Embeds Rig/ADK patterns, Tokio async architecture, tracing observability, performance techniques, erro...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and optimize an existing Convex app: security, scale, upgrades, observability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and optimize an existing Convex app: security, scale, upgrades, observability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconstruct workflow behind a past coding-agent artifact using local ax sessions/commits/skills/tool traces. Use when asked how X was built.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an API mocking expert specializing in realistic mock services for development, testing, and demos. Design mocks that simulate real API behavior and enable parallel development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。