「process design」の検索結果

Use this skill when creating, deploying, or troubleshooting Salesforce Business Hours and Holidays: the calendars that pause Case escalation rules, entitlement milestones, and Apex BusinessHours math outside working hours. Covers the BusinessHoursSettings metadata, the default calendar, per-region calendars, holiday attachment, the Case Business Hours field, and the BusinessHours Apex class. Trigger keywords: business hours, holidays, SLA clock, escalation not pausing, working hours, support hours, milestone timer weekend. NOT for the escalation rule entries themselves — use admin/escalation-rules. NOT for entitlement process design — use admin/entitlements-and-milestones. NOT for Field Service operating hours or shift scheduling — use admin/fsl-scheduling-setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI No-Code Automation Expert — Zapier, Make, n8n, workflow design, trigger/action, process automation สำหรับทุก business

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Django + Celery async task patterns — configuration, task design, beat scheduling, retries, canvas workflows, monitoring, and testing. Use when adding background jobs, scheduled tasks, or async processing to a Django app.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes data engineering tasks to the correct DE expert agent. Use when user requests data pipeline design, DAG authoring, SQL modeling, stream processing, or warehouse optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrator for the Creative Production skill set — turn a brief into reviewable visual assets. Routes to the right sub-skill (explore, moodboard, positioning, offer, ads-explorer, scene, shot, polish) based on where you are in the creative process. Use when the user gives a high-level creative goal like "make campaign assets", "I need visuals for X", "produce ad creative", "design product shots", or isn't sure which creative step they need. Delegates to creative-* skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose DAGs into execution chains using width bounds, stratification, virtual nodes, and matching. Use when minimizing workflow lanes in dependency graphs. NOT for cyclic graphs, generic scheduling, or one-off queries with no preprocessing payoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and implement systematic checklists that reduce errors by 30-50% in complex, high-stakes domains (medicine, aviation, construction, finance). NOT for simple tasks or when comprehensive instruction is needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level composites engineering covering fiber reinforced polymers, matrix materials, laminate theory, manufacturing processes, failure modes, and composite design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Especialista em CrewAI - o principal framework multi-agente baseado em papéis utilizado por 60% das empresas da Fortune 500. Abrange design de agentes com papéis e objetivos, definição de tarefas, orquestração de crew, tipos de processo (sequencial, hierárquico, paralelo), sistemas de memória e flows para workflows complexos. Essencial para construir equipes colaborativas de agentes IA. Use quando: crewai, equipe multi-agente, papéis de agentes, crew de agentes, agentes baseados em papéis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs an end-to-end process for finding, extracting, enriching, qualifying, and exporting leads. Use when the user wants a repeatable lead workflow plan rather than a single source plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a Mixture of Experts (MoE) audit on any topic, plan, codebase, evidence archive, or process. Dynamically spawns specialized subagents with different critical lenses to cross-reference findings and detect flaws, overlap, retention issues, or drift. Use when designing architectures, analyzing complex code, verifying multi-step plans, classifying evidence artifacts, or looking for duplicated intent in a repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and implement unit, conformance, integration, timing, boot, trace, video, audio, and regression tests for EMULATORS processors, chips, peripherals, and complete machines. Use when creating a verification strategy for a new emulator, converting hardware documentation into tests, adding diagnostic programs or golden artifacts, measuring behavioral coverage, or proving that components interact correctly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, run, and measure an adversary engagement operation using the MITRE Engage framework so that deployed deception is driven by strategy instead of deployed ad hoc. Covers the Engage Matrix (Prepare, Expose, Affect, Elicit, Understand), the 10-Step Operational Process, mapping engagement Activities to the ATT&CK techniques they expose, and defining measurable Goals and Operational Objectives. Use when a team has honeypots, honeytokens, or canary tokens but no coordinating strategy, when leadership asks "should we engage attackers and how", when building a deception/denial program, when writing an adversary engagement operation plan, or when deciding which deception Activities to deploy against a specific threat actor. Keywords: MITRE Engage, adversary engagement, cyber deception strategy, denial and deception, Engage Matrix, EAC, EGO, Expose Affect Elicit, deception program, honeypot strategy, engagement operation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load when invoking the standalone `event-setup` machine CLI to inspect the environment catalogue, validate or render dotenv input, process configuration manifests or tenant packages, export/import operator-identity portability artifacts, validate legal drafts, or run setup diagnostics; do not use for the interactive terminal UI, browser setup, or API endpoint design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesized reference notes from three US Government vehicle-safety sources: NHTSA Cybersecurity Best Practices for the Safety of Modern Vehicles (updated 2022, final), NHTSA Automated Driving Systems 2.0: A Vision for Safety (2017), and a 16-section selection of 49 CFR Part 571 (FMVSS) pinned at eCFR versioner date 2025-01-01. Use for voluntary vehicle cybersecurity practices, the ADS 2.0 twelve priority safety design elements, and FMVSS occupant protection, brakes/stability/lighting, and fuel/EV integrity requirements. Not ISO 26262, not ASPICE, not ISO/SAE 21434, not UNECE R155/R156, not SAE J3016, and not the full Part 571; the FMVSS material is a selection of vehicle-level minimum performance standards, not a process standard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA Human Systems Integration (HSI) Practitioner's Guide (NASA/SP-2015-3709). Use for HSI process implementation, lifecycle phase activities, function allocation, ConOps development, HSI Plan writing, HSI metrics (MOE/MOP/TPM/KPP), HITL testing strategy, HSI team organisation, scaling/tailoring for program size, and V&V planning. Does not cover the specific human engineering design standards (NASA-STD-3001 content) or detailed HFE methods beyond what the guide itself provides.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the OUSD(R&E) guidebook Implementing a MOSA in DoD Programs (Feb 2025). Use for the Modular Open Systems Approach as a DoD acquisition + design discipline: the statutory/regulatory basis (10 U.S.C. 4401–4403, FY2017/FY2021 NDAA, DFARS), the five OUSD(R&E) pillars, the plan→modularize→identify→define→standardize interface lifecycle, technical levers (WBS/MIL-STD-881F taxonomy, standards profiling, API-first software, COTS/cybersecurity), MOSA assessment metrics and tools (PART/OAAT/KOSS/SEAM/MAUT), technology-change and DMSMS management, roadmaps, MOSA across the six AAF pathways, and contracting/IP/data-rights mechanics. SCOPE LIMITS: this is U.S. DoD weapon-system acquisition policy, not a general open-architecture or interface-standards reference — it names standards (FACE, OMS, DISR) without reproducing them, is light on detailed engineering of any specific standard, and does not cover the underlying SE processes (use dau-se-guidebook / nasa-npr-7123) or general systems-engineering theory (use sebok).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA AMS Lifecycle V&V Guidelines (verification and validation), Version 3.0, dated April 2017. Use for applying verification and validation across the FAA Acquisition Management System (AMS) lifecycle: the verify-vs-validate distinction (built right vs. right thing), the work-product/component/product tiers, the nine V&V planning elements, the four method catalogs (Appendix C), decision-point-gated V&V (SASP, CRD, Investment Analysis, Solution Implementation, In-Service Management), the Appendix B document checklists (PRD/APB/ISPD/PMP), and the DT/OT/IOA test triad. Scope limits: this is an FAA acquisition-V&V doctrine, NOT a general SE process model, requirements-engineering manual, or test-design textbook. It borrows its core V&V definitions from CMMI v1.2 (SEI, paraphrased) and presumes the surrounding AMS lifecycle (see the FAA SEM pack); its phase tables are policy snapshots as of April 2017 and it is thin on detailed test methods, tool specifics, and anything outside FAA acquisition governance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the Expanded Guidance for NASA Systems Engineering (NASA/SP-2016-6105-SUPPL, Volume 1, March 2016) — the practitioner-depth supplement to the NASA SE Handbook. Use for the load-bearing mechanics the handbook compresses: the SE Engine's per-phase cadence and the iterative-vs-recursive distinction, the AS9100 crosswalk, life-cycle tailoring vs. customization and the Compliance Matrix, the recursive system-design consistency loop (ConOps vs. Operations Concept, requirement flow/type/ownership, successive refinement), product realization (verify/qualify/accept/certify cardinality, protoflight, 'test the way we fly' coverage, two-form transition), and the crosscutting technical-management procedures (six-step scheduling, cost-estimating method selection, JCL, interface document family, RIDM/CRM, CM baselines, EVM arithmetic, MOE/MOP/KPP/TPM, the three required leading indicators, and the decision-analysis method catalog). This is the DEPTH layer — it deliberately does NOT restate the base definitions; pair it with the nasa-se-handbook pack. Scope: NASA space-flight SE practice (Vol 1 Practices); thin on the Vol 2 process-appendix detail, on non-NASA/commercial life cycles, and on software-engineering methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect and manage Elementor MCP servers as "MCP Apps" on NV oOS assistants — official Elementor MCP (application passwords, permission inheritance, enable/revoke flows), third-party Elementor MCP plugins, the Pro MCP Apps metabox/slash-command/REST surfaces, the Remote Sites "MCP Server" connection type with assistant connection_ref references, auth-type mapping (basic vs header vs oauth), the host allowlist (Security Center setting, constant, filter), tool discovery/bridging into chat, and troubleshooting (allowlist 403s, restricted hosts, protocol fallback, negative discovery cache, same-site in-process bridge, missing connection_ref). Use when connecting an assistant to Elementor MCP, creating a Remote Sites MCP Server connection, using /mcp-app, fixing Test Connection or Discover Tools failures, allowlisting an Elementor host, or debugging bridged elementor_* tools missing from chat.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

新規・変更 skill の fixture/eval と、WITH/WITHOUT の paired ablation による限界寄与の評価可能性を確認し、activation と effectiveness を分離して案内する。

Apply when designing commands, lifecycle steps, or processing loops that run amid crashes, restarts, and retries. Converge to the same end state regardless of partial prior runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design durable workflows with Temporal for distributed systems. Covers workflow vs activity separation, saga patterns, state management, and determinism constraints. Use when building long-running processes, distributed transactions, or microservice orchestration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a workflow automation expert specializing in creating efficient CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions workflows, and automated development processes. Design automation that reduces manual work, i...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。