1,643 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, C#, .NET, Java, C, C++, Rust, Ruby, PHP, and Dart/Flutter. Analyzes PRs for complexity and risk, checks code quality for SOLID violations and code smells, generates review reports. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, identifying issues, generating review checklists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, measure, and evolve company culture as operational behavior — not wall posters. Covers mission/vision/values workshops, values-to-behaviors translation, culture code creation, culture health assessment, and cultural rituals by stage. Use when building company values, assessing culture health, designing cultural rituals, creating culture codes, handling culture clashes, or when user mentions culture, values, culture debt, founder culture, or culture code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mentor Swedish language learners by selecting YouTube video clips and podcast episodes by CEFR level and skill (listening, reading, writing, speaking), and building a simple learning path. Use when the user asks about a Swedish learning path, YouTube clips or podcasts for Swedish, SFI videos, level assessment for svenska, or requests for Peter SFI / Lätt Svenska med Oskar / Radio Sweden på lätt svenska / Klartext-style recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Persistente dateibasierte Planung für mehrstufige Arbeit mit KI-Agenten. Hält task_plan.md, findings.md und progress.md auf dem Datenträger; Lebenszyklus-Hooks speisen ausgewählten Planungskontext des Projekts ein. Die automatische Wiederherstellung liest nur die Planungsdateien des Projekts. Nur ein ausdrücklicher Aufruf von session-catchup.py --metadata darf lokale Sitzungsmetadaten desselben Projekts prüfen; --replay darf begrenzte, nonce-gerahmte Auszüge ausgeben. Der optionale Gate-Modus kann nur bei Unterstützung durch den Host eine Fortsetzung anfordern und führt niemals in Markdown angegebene Befehle aus. Der Skill hat keinen Netzwerk-Uploadpfad. Verwenden für Forschung oder Arbeit mit mehr als 5 Tool-Aufrufen.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a detailed SWOT analysis — strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats with actionable recommendations. Use when doing strategic assessment, competitive analysis, or evaluating a product or business position.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify risky assumptions for a feature idea in an existing product across Value, Usability, Viability, and Feasibility. Uses multi-perspective devil's advocate thinking. Use when stress-testing a feature idea, doing risk assessment, or preparing for assumption mapping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a requested security review of a NemoClaw PR or a PR linked to an issue. Use for vulnerability or trust-boundary assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrates comprehensive production readiness reviews and assessments for GKE clusters and workloads across scalability, security, reliability, observability, backup/DR, and cost optimization. Use when asked to productionize, prepare, assess, audit, or review a GKE cluster or workload before going live to production. Don't use for deep-dive single-domain implementation (use specific domain skills like gke-workload-scaling, gke-platform-security, gke-workload-security, gke-service-networking, gke-reliability instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Daily competitor-watch loop for {{watch_list}}. Fetches each tracked page, diffs it against the last run's stored snapshot, filters cosmetic edits from meaningful ones, and posts a short summary to {{slack_channel}} — or nothing on a quiet day.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and update 68 US economic and social indicators from five government APIs (FRED, EIA, Treasury, BLS, Census) across 10 categories: GDP, Inflation, Employment, Housing, Consumer Finance, Markets, Trade, Government/Fiscal, Demographics, Health. Two workflows: UpdateData, GetCurrentState (10y/5y/2y/1y trend analysis). USE WHEN GDP, inflation, unemployment, economic metrics, gas prices, how is the economy, refresh data, FRED, US metrics, economic trends. NOT FOR pathogen surveillance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Defensive threat modeling and risk management for your own estate — map where sensitive data lives across your asset graph, run compromise scenarios (what a hacked asset exposes, its blast radius, how you'd respond), and maintain a persistent risk register with likelihood×impact scoring, owners, mitigations, and review cadence via a deterministic CLI. All real data stays in your private USER tree; this skill is code only. USE WHEN threat model, threat modeling, risk register, risk assessment, what if X got hacked, compromise scenario, blast radius, sensitive data map, where is our sensitive data, data classification, risk review, add a risk, accept a risk, security risk posture. NOT FOR active pentesting or exploitation (use an offensive-security skill), world-scale futures stress-testing of ideas (use WorldThreatModel), or executing incident response (use your incident-response runbooks — this skill plans them).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
3-pass scope oscillation that holds a question constant while shifting zoom — narrow/tactical, wide/strategic, then synthesis — to surface design tensions, scope recommendations, and coherence assessments invisible at any single zoom level. USE WHEN aperture oscillation, oscillate scope, zoom in and out, tactical vs strategic, scope framing, design tension, system coherence check, local vs global design, wrong scope, scope negotiation. NOT FOR lens rotation across angles (use IterativeDepth).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used for advanced LLM evaluation: LLM-as-judge systems, direct scoring, pairwise comparison, rubric calibration, evaluator bias mitigation, confidence scoring, and automated quality assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous multi-round research review loop. Repeatedly reviews using Claude Code via claude-review MCP, implements fixes, and re-reviews until positive assessment or max rounds reached. Use when user says "auto review loop", "review until it passes", or wants autonomous iterative improvement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous multi-round research review loop. Repeatedly reviews using a secondary Codex agent, implements fixes, and re-reviews until positive assessment or max rounds reached. Use when user says "auto review loop", "review until it passes", or wants autonomous iterative improvement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous multi-round research review loop. Repeatedly reviews using Gemini via gemini-review MCP, implements fixes, and re-reviews until positive assessment or max rounds reached. Use when user says "auto review loop", "review until it passes", or wants autonomous iterative improvement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous multi-round research review loop. In Copilot CLI it defaults to the native complementary rubber-duck subagent with host-event model evidence; elsewhere it uses Codex, while explicit external reviewer overrides remain available. Implements fixes and re-reviews until a policy-approved positive assessment or max rounds is reached.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Develop evidence-backed structural and architectural security hardening proposals from vulnerability disclosures, supplied findings, incident or assessment documents, source code, or a completed Codex Security scan. Use when a user asks for systemic improvements, alternatives beyond per-finding patches, before-and-after security architecture views, engineering tradeoff analysis, or an implementation-ready plan for a selected hardening option. Also use automatically after a Codex Security scan with reportable findings when the top-level scan workflow requests final-report hardening guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Content quality and E-E-A-T assessment for AI citability — evaluate experience, expertise, authoritativeness, trustworthiness, and content structure
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check the full candidate diff, affected consumers, focused tests, evidence identities, and verification gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep briefing on one matter — current posture, what's changed, next deadline, open questions, and a risk re-assessment check, ready before a GC update or outside counsel call. Use when the user says "brief me on [matter]", "where are we on [matter]", or needs a read on a specific matter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Append a dated event to a matter's history file and refresh the log row — captures new developments, status changes, risk re-assessments, deadline shifts, and settlement authority changes. Use when the user wants to log an update on a matter, note a development, or record a status change against the portfolio.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate or drill flashcards for black-letter memorization — Leitner-style buckets, per-subject markdown storage, drill mode with self-assessment. Use when the user says "drill flashcards", "make flashcards from", "quiz me on cards", or wants to memorize rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。