「what」の検索結果

Generate the ≤10-minute Loom walkthrough script for a completed Weekly Community Signal report — a plain spoken briefing that dives straight into what the team needs to know, walking the report top to bottom (CopilotKit page first, then AG-UI in the same order). Straightforward and factual, NOT a radio show or a performance; no hype opener, no blame framing. Runs after every report (invoked by weekly-report) and on "loom script", "walkthrough script", "record the loom", "narrate the report".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Subagent that scans CopilotKit + AG-UI releases shipped in (and just after) the report window, diffs the git tags to extract what each release actually fixed, and returns a fix-map the weekly-report writer cross-checks against open issues. Catches issues that are quietly already-fixed in a shipped release, and is the authoritative source for the "current release vX.Y.Z" version claims. Invoked by weekly-report (spawned in parallel with the Discord/GitHub pulls); runs as a general-purpose subagent so the orchestrator's context stays small.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer questions about the venue rate facts recorded in this model and identify what its source leaves unspecified.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spin up a single agent as an advisor — second opinion on the current task. Use when the user says "advisor", "second opinion", "what does X think", or wants an outside take without delegating the work itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build AI-powered software with TypeSafe: small units of AI intelligence you can use like programming primitives. Its System One models, including Jev, turn natural language and application state into typed judgments and probabilities that code can combine. Use when a feature needs programmable common sense, when brainstorming what AI could make possible in an app, or when an LLM prompt-and-parse step could become a structured decision. Applications include routing, ranking, extraction, verification, and interactive experiences; these are starting points, not the limits. Read live docs and cookbooks to find useful patterns and discover new combinations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explains the ~/.worktrees/<path-key>/<branch> worktree convention, the dotfiles-repo opt-in, and what a dotfiles worktree cannot validate. Use to understand or explain worktree layout and its constraints; use the git-worktree skill to actually create, switch to, or delete one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn an idea into a Conventional Docs Decision, then a Plan: classify the request, explore options and risks through dialogue, then commit a numbered Decision that review, prototypes, and acceptance move through. Use PROACTIVELY before any creative work — new features, new subsystems, interface or dependency changes, or any open-ended design question ("what are the options", "how should I approach", "should I use X or Y", "help me decide", "write a decision", "ADR").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a written plan or design doc through a designer's lens before implementation - seven passes over information architecture, interaction states, emotional arc, AI-slop risk, design-system alignment, responsive and accessibility coverage, and unresolved decisions. Each dimension is rated 0-10 with an explicit statement of what would make it a 10, then the plan is edited to get there. Use when a plan has a UI surface and you want the design gaps closed before code is written. Not for auditing a live site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check GitHub Actions CI status for PRs and branches. Use when the user asks "did CI pass", "check status", "what failed", "are checks green", "PR checks", "CI status", "workflow status", "re-run jobs", or wants a quick summary of GitHub Actions runs for a PR or the current branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn the current conversation into a spec and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stop. That last message did not land — re-pitch it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks how code works, wants to understand architecture, trace execution flows, or explore unfamiliar parts of the codebase. Examples: "How does X work?", "What calls this function?", "Show me the auth flow"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about GitNexus itself — available tools, how to query the knowledge graph, MCP resources, graph schema, or workflow reference. Examples: "What GitNexus tools are available?", "How do I use GitNexus?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write what the work found into the project's knowledge record, so the next session inherits it instead of re-deriving it. Use the moment something worth keeping exists: a fact taken from a source, a rule worked out, a decision or conclusion, a measurement, a correction to a recorded value, or a question left open - and check for unrecorded findings before implementation, handoff (including a PR), or finishing work. Record within the user's write authorization. The first write creates GROUNDING.yaml. Covers one-report update, add, set, review, same and distinct, judgments with a falsifier, and background capture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map existing materials into a first knowledge record, or investigate a subject's history in depth. Use whenever the user asks to map, survey, go through, reconstruct or investigate what already exists - folders of documents, decision records, meeting notes, emails, exports, code - or wants a starting record built from existing materials, even when the word 'record' is never said: consult this before listing or reading the files yourself, because a map has an agreed scope, a protocol and a report. Also, once, at a suitable moment, to offer the starting choices where a workspace has no record and the work is clearly ongoing - never on a greeting. Learning while working needs no map. Requests come in any language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when extracting Voice-of-Customer themes from existing artefacts — GH issues, PR threads, Sentry patterns. Triggers on 'what are users saying', 'recurring complaints', 'top themes'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when modeling CAC, LTV, payback, contribution margin, or burn-multiple per customer — SaaS, marketplace, or transactional. Triggers on 'are we unit-economic', 'what is our LTV/CAC'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when articulating internal vision — where we're going / why now / why us, founder-mode anchor, distinct from fundraising pitch. Triggers on 'what's our vision', 'why are we doing this'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when constructing base / upside / downside scenarios — three-statement modeling, sensitivity analysis, optionality reasoning. Triggers on 'model the scenarios', 'what if growth halves'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when surfacing and prioritising risk before commit — blast-radius framing, mitigations, residual-risk verdict — even if the user just says 'what could go wrong here?'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when establishing what observability a project actually has — the four Golden Signals, required signal to detected implementation to evidence, and SLI/SLO provenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use to audit a past architectural decision — did the chosen option hold up, what assumptions drifted, should the ADR be superseded? Backward review only; does not lock new choices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。