「what」の検索結果

Wing-4 valuation cognition for a CFO / finance-partner. Use when a deal, internal investment, or board ask names DCF, intrinsic value, WACC, terminal value, or 'what's it worth on a 5-year hold'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When shaping cadence — evergreen / campaign / reactive split, beat-mapping across channel stages, content-debt management. Triggers on 'plan our content cadence', 'what should we publish'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when mapping competitors, naming defensibility, and finding white-space — moat reasoning, where-to-play, where-not-to-play. Triggers on 'who are we competing with', 'what's our moat'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding what earns a page — the page, action and info classes stated provider-neutrally, and the rule that a page without an owner, a runbook and a first diagnostic step is malformed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ground a brand strategy from the corpus — archetype, opposable positioning, voice and tone, messaging framework. Use to decide who a brand is for, what it stands for, and how it sounds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, edit, explain, validate, or troubleshoot a proctmux.yaml/procmux.yaml file, add or change proctmux processes, configure lifecycle behavior such as stop signals/on_kill/autostart, customize unified-mode layout/keybindings/style, or enable Makefile/package.json process discovery. Use it even when the user says this casually, such as "add my dev server to proctmux", "fix this proctmux config", "write a config for these services", or "what YAML option controls focus".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate terminal UI (TUI) apps with agent-tui for testing, inspection, demos, and scripted interactions. Use when automating CLI/TUI flows, regression testing terminal apps, verifying interactive behavior, or extracting structured text from terminal UIs. Also use when asked what agent-tui is, how it works, or to demo it. Do not use for web browsers, GUI apps, or non-terminal interfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about GitNexus itself — available tools, how to query the knowledge graph, MCP resources, graph schema, or workflow reference. Examples: "What GitNexus tools are available?", "How do I use GitNexus?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks how code works, wants to understand architecture, trace execution flows, or explore unfamiliar parts of the codebase. Examples: "How does X work?", "What calls this function?", "Show me the auth flow"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch transcripts from YouTube videos for summarization, analysis, or reference. Accepts video ID or full URL. No API key required. Triggers: YouTube transcript, video transcript, get subtitles, what did they say in the video, summarize YouTube, extract video text, caption from video.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write minimal, accessible web UI without over-engineering, adapting to whatever stack the project uses — React, Vue, Svelte, Angular, web components, or plain HTML. Use this skill on every project and every task that writes or reviews markup or components, builds forms, adds interactive elements like buttons, dialogs, accordions, or tabs, or audits code for accessibility — even when the user never mentions accessibility, and even inside a framework, CMS, or design system. It's non-negotiable regardless of project type, stack, or deadline. About to reach for ARIA attributes, a dialog library, a focus-trap package, or a headless UI component? Use this skill first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Code Intelligence] Use when investigating what happens when code executes, understanding blast radius, or tracing frontend-to-backend flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Git] Use when the user asks to compare branches, analyze git diffs, review changes between branches, update specifications based on code changes, or analyze what changed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing a repository for evidence-backed gaps between code, SPECs, architecture, and documentation — before a release, after a review, or when the user asks what is missing or divergent. Confirmed gaps become Draft SPECs via write-specs, a tracked GitHub Epic via create-issues, and orchestrated execution via orchestrator, with an explicit approval gate before any external action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to find or discover a Claude Code skill that is NOT already installed — e.g. "is there a skill for X", "find me a skill that…", "what skills exist for…", or "/find-skill <topic>". Searches the official plugin marketplace, GitHub, and curated awesome-lists for community skills matching a need, removes anything already installed, and recommends the top 5 with links. Do NOT use this to create or edit skills (that is skill authoring), or to pick among skills you already have.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish or audit a structural quality contract for any agent-operated engineering repository: app, library, CLI/tool, plugin, harness, or meta repo. Use when a repo needs charter clarity, docs/decision ownership, type-native validation gates, evidence paths, safe action policy, cold-start legibility, maturity proof, repair-loop routing, consumer/producer owner-boundary routing, command surface evolution, evolutionary simplicity (see references/evolutionary-simplicity.md), or a repo ecology pass to decide what should be compressed, merged, removed, updated, created, retired, or moved to checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Replace with what this skill does and when to use it. Include trigger phrases users say, e.g. "audit my API", "scaffold a skill"; activation-critical routing belongs here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a ready-to-paste social post kit for an app, tool, or project launch or update — "make social posts", "launch posts", "post kit", "prep socials", "promote this". Produces one Markdown file with finished posts for X, Reddit, Instagram, LinkedIn, Threads, and short-form video, plus a pre-post checklist. Pull real facts from the project (repo, release, what it does, OS, links).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teach the user exactly ONE thing from the current session or project, in plain English, one or two short paragraphs. Use when the user types ;til or "til", asks "what did I learn", "explain one thing from this session", or at session close alongside other closing rituals. Also appropriate mid-session when a concept keeps recurring that the user clearly hasn't used themselves. One thing only — never a list, never a lecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, reviewing, or implementing Settings/Preferences for Apple-platform apps — what belongs in Settings vs Inspector/Toolbar, grouped forms, native controls, secure storage, launch at login, and destructive actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use between coding-agent runs (Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Aider, etc.) to stop the project from drifting, overbuilding, or accumulating dead weight. Forces a read-only audit that classifies every active item as KEEP / DELAY / REMOVE and ends with a single, unambiguous next action. Trigger on "audit before continuing", "what should I do next", "this project got too big", "between runs", "trim scope", "stop adding stuff", or any signal that the project feels noisy and the next step is unclear. Do NOT load for trivial one-line fixes, when the next action is already obvious, or when you're mid-run and just need to keep going.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run on an existing project to decide KEEP / MERGE / ARCHIVE — never limbo. Forces a call on tools that already exist and may have stopped earning their keep. Trigger on "is this still worth keeping", "audit this repo", "tech-debt cleanup", "sweep the folder", "what's dead here", or any signal that something hasn't been touched in months. Judged from both the agent lens (still legible, still drivable, still safe) and the human lens (do I still reach for it, does it nag). Includes a non-negotiable footgun check for stale pipelines that can overwrite live data. Outputs a backed AUDIT.md and a one-line verdict note in the project root docs. Do NOT load for greenfield projects (use new-project-gate), one-off bug fixes, or when the answer is already obvious.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Virtual QA Lead that turns requirements into review-ready, TestRail-importable test cases in one conversation. Use it whenever the user has requirements, a spec, a user story, or acceptance criteria (PDF, DOCX, XLSX, TXT, MD, or pasted text) and wants test cases, a test plan, a checklist, test coverage, a regression suite, or a TestRail/Qase/Zephyr export, even without saying "test cases" ("write tests for this spec", "what should we check here?"). Especially useful when they attach their team's existing test cases to match. When the spec describes an API (endpoints, status codes, schemas, auth, OpenAPI/Swagger), Casely also builds a runnable Postman collection, so use it for "API tests", "Postman collection", or "tests I can run in Newman/CI". Triggers on the same request in any language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。