「frame」の検索結果

Route agent work through AccInt's MCP memory loop: retrieve prior outcomes, resolve frames, and close commitments with evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a single-file industrial-archive product landing page (Nordic museum aesthetic, hash-routed detail pages). Takes a natural-language description of one or more "exhibit-style" products (objects, tools, hardware, watches, kitchenware, lighting, audio, instruments, anything with a designed/forged/restrained quality); outputs ONE working .html file. Visitors see a black-framed cover that flips between exhibits, sidebar index, side meta column (material/origin/year/dimension), and click any exhibit → full detail page (giant italic title, spec table, hero image, lead + 3 prose paragraphs, gallery, prev/next). Runs in BOTH Claude Code (writes to ~/Desktop) and GLM / online chat (outputs HTML inline). Trigger: "做个工业风产品落地页", "做克制之物风格的展品页", "industrial-archive-gen ...", or when user drags this skill folder into chat asking for a product page in the Nordic-industrial archive style.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Swiss 网格 / 系统派社交卡 — 精确 / 系统化 / 技术感 / 方法论调性。卡角色含 system 封面 / numbered method / 对比 before-after / KPI tower / 横条 mini-chart / 截图解释 / 证据墙 / 收尾 checklist。用于 framework / checklist / 工具说明 / AI workflow / 产品更新 / KPI 总结。触发："做个方法卡 / 框架卡 / 工具拆解卡 / AI 工具卡 / 系统派结构卡"。NOT 情绪 / 文学 / 图主导卡，NOT 软生活 pastel 风。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monta carrossel completo — estrutura de slides, hierarquia por slide e construção no Figma como componente com variantes. Use quando o usuário disser "carrossel", "slides", "carrossel do LinkedIn", "carrossel do Instagram", "post em sequência", "documento do LinkedIn". Recebe a copy slide a slide e entrega frames montados e revisados.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write comprehensive end-to-end tests that verify complete user workflows, integration between components, and system behavior from user perspective using Playwright, Cypress, or similar frameworks. Use when testing user flows, verifying feature integration, testing across real browsers, ensuring UI interactions work correctly, validating form submissions end-to-end, testing authentication flows, catching regressions, automating QA processes, testing API integrations, or building confidence in production deployments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end Solana development playbook (Jan 2026). Prefer Solana Foundation framework-kit (@solana/client + @solana/react-hooks) for React/Next.js UI. Prefer @solana/kit for all new client/RPC/transaction code. When legacy dependencies require web3.js, isolate it behind @solana/web3-compat (or @solana/web3.js as a true legacy fallback). Covers wallet-standard-first connection (incl. ConnectorKit), Anchor/Pinocchio programs, Codama-based client generation, LiteSVM/Mollusk/Surfpool testing, and security checklists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Upgrades existing websites and apps to premium quality. Audits current design, identifies generic AI patterns, and applies high-end design standards without breaking functionality. Works with any CSS framework or vanilla CSS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Integrate Expo and React Native into an existing native iOS or Android app. Use when the user mentions brownfield, embedding React Native in a native app, AAR/XCFramework, or adding Expo to an existing Kotlin/Swift project. Covers both the isolated approach and the integrated approach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Elite mobile app image-generation skill for creating premium, app-native screen concepts and flows. Designed for iOS, Android, and cross-platform mobile products. Prioritizes clean hierarchy, comfortably readable text, strong multi-screen consistency, controlled color palettes, non-generic creative direction, textured surfaces, image-led composition, tasteful custom iconography, and clean phone mockup framing. By default, screens should be shown inside a subtle premium iPhone or similar phone mockup with a visible frame, while the main focus stays on the app content itself. This skill generates images only. It does not write code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan ATM framework refactors by preserving atom/map semantics before splitting large governance modules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build the ATM framework runner and sync it to explicit internal adopter repositories with skip/exclude controls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

UI 資產委託導演 SKILL — 讀取 family-map 與 skin-family-*.json，產生 asset-task-manifest / param-tune-manifest 與精確 ArtRecipe，列出每個 family slot 所需的 spriteFrame 路徑、尺寸規格、9-slice 邊距。USE FOR: family-architect 輸出 asset-pending 狀態後，正式產出 UCUF partial asset 任務。DO NOT USE FOR: 非 UI 資產生成、程式邏輯開發、QA 驗證（用 ui-asset-qc）。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ATM 版本升級與開源 release train 工作流。USE FOR: ATM frameworkVersion 升級、release impact 分類、SemVer 決策、CODEOWNERS / changeset / release gate 檢查、ATM upstream release docs 維護。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ATM Captain 派工治理。觸發詞 派工 / 派工單 / dispatch / 開卡 / 派任務 / 派代理 / Phase 0 / Phase 1 / AAO / task card / condition review / 收口。負責 AI-Atomic-Framework (AAF) + 3KLife 雙 repo 治理：強制 Context Map 4 層、雙代理拆分（防外卡 mirror commit）、AAF 嚴格 2 commit、3KLife target_repo 嚴格 1 commit、7-8 段回報、禁止清單前置強化、Captain condition review。承載 0064 → 0093+ 累積的紀律教訓。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Idiomatic Go - package and interface design, error wrapping, table-driven tests, generics, the modern standard library (slices/maps/cmp/errors.Join), current syntax, and logging discipline. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring any Go code, especially code drifting toward Java/Spring shapes (deep layer trees, generic repositories, heavy frameworks) - even if the user never says "idiomatic". Distilled from spf13/go-skills and adapted to this repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break a stuck or complex problem into the smallest sub-question that, if answered, unlocks the next step — then answer it and repeat until the path forward is clear. Load when a problem feels genuinely stuck, when reasoning keeps circling, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a Socratic frame. Also triggers on "I keep going in circles", "what is the real question here", "help me reason through this step by step", "unstick my thinking", "recursive questioning", "what is the root question". Based on the recursive Socratic questioning method (EMNLP 2023) which outperforms CoT and Tree-of-Thought on complex reasoning tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think through the consequences of consequences — not just what happens immediately, but what happens next, and next after that, across time. Load when a decision looks obviously good or obviously bad on initial read, when the user is optimising for a short-term outcome that might create a long-term problem, when unintended consequences are a concern, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a second-order frame. Triggers on "what are the downstream effects", "what happens after that", "unintended consequences", "think ahead on this", "long-term vs short-term", or "what comes after that". Based on Howard Marks second-level thinking and Farnam Street mental models. Most powerful for decisions with delayed consequences or systemic effects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a pre-mortem — imagine the project has already failed one year from now and work backward to find the root causes before they happen. Load when the user asks for a pre-mortem, wants to imagine failure before committing, asks "what could go wrong before we start", "assume this fails — why", "risk analysis before launch", "what kills this project", "what could go wrong", or when deep-thinking diagnoses a pre-mortem frame. Based on Gary Klein's prospective hindsight method, which surfaces failure causes more effectively than forward risk analysis. Most useful right before a major commitment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply Boyd's OODA loop to navigate fast-moving, uncertain, or competitive situations — Observe what is actually happening, Orient through mental models and context, Decide on the clearest path, Act quickly, then loop again. Load when the situation is changing faster than the current plan, when a competitive response is needed, when the user is stuck in analysis paralysis in a dynamic environment, when shipping under uncertainty, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a fast-moving / competitive frame. Triggers on "what should we do right now", "the situation is changing", "how do we respond to this", "competitive response", "we need to move fast", or "we're stuck deciding". Based on John Boyd's OODA loop — Observe, Orient, Decide, Act — adapted for product and business contexts (OODA Canvas 2026).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a structured discovery interview and produce a complete, developer-ready Product Requirements Document. Load when the user asks to write a PRD, create product requirements, document a feature, define user stories with acceptance criteria, or turn a rough idea into a formal product requirements document. Also triggers on "document this feature", "write requirements for", "create a one-pager", "turn this into a PRD", "I need a PRD for", or any request to produce a structured product document for stakeholder alignment or engineering handoff. Supports Full PRD, Lean PRD, and One-Pager formats. Note: for executable feature specifications (FRs, NFRs, ACs as Given/When/Then consumable by AI coding agents), route to `feature-spec` instead — PRDs frame the product, feature-specs encode the implementable contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flip a problem, goal, or decision 180 degrees to find what forward thinking misses. Asks what would guarantee failure, then works backward to what must be avoided or changed. Load when the user says "invert this", "flip this problem", "what would guarantee failure", "think backward", "reverse engineer the goal", "think about it backwards", or when deep-thinking diagnoses an inversion frame. Also triggers on "what's the opposite of success here", "how would we sabotage this". Two methods: Failure Inversion and Opposite Goal. Max 2 clarifying questions before inverting. Always returns forward actions. For broader analysis, deep-thinking calls this.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strip a problem to its irreducible fundamental truths and rebuild the solution from the ground up — free from analogy, convention, and inherited assumptions. Load when the user feels constrained by how something has always been done, when existing solutions feel expensive or inefficient for no good reason, when the user asks to think from first principles, challenge the fundamentals, or rebuild this from scratch. Also triggers on "why does it have to work this way", "what are the actual constraints here", "ignore what everyone else does", or when deep-thinking diagnoses a convention-break frame. Based on Aristotle's first principles method, popularised by Musk and Feynman. Produces genuinely novel solutions by eliminating convention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture the "why" behind technical choices to prevent architectural drift. Load when the user makes a major technical decision, chooses a library/framework, defines a system boundary, or changes a core architectural pattern. Also triggers on "record a decision", "write an ADR", "why did we do this", "document this architectural choice", or "architectural decision record". Supports `SYNTHESIS=true` mode for retrospective ADR backfill from observed repo state — used by `retroactive-project-setup` and any future backfill skill. Essential for long-term project maintainability and agent alignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Surface every assumption embedded in a plan, strategy, or document, assess how critical and how validated each one is, and identify which ones to test first. Load when the user asks to map assumptions, surface hidden beliefs, find what must be true for this to work, run an assumption audit, or when deep-thinking diagnoses an assumption frame. Also triggers on "what are we assuming", "what must be true for this to work", or "find the untested beliefs". Based on David Bland and Alex Osterwalder's assumption mapping method from Testing Business Ideas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。