「assumption」の検索結果

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Android APK hooking, Frida tracing, request-signing recovery, SSL pinning bypass, JNI boundary inspection, and app trust-boundary analysis. Use when the user asks to hook an APK, inspect signer logic, trace Java or native boundaries, bypass pinning or root checks, inspect shared prefs or app databases, or replay accepted mobile requests. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for file uploads, imports, previews, archive extraction, format conversion, parser invocation, and deserialization chains. Use when the user asks to inspect an upload or import path, trace archive extraction, preview or converter behavior, explain how a file reaches a parser or deserializer, or connect one uploaded artifact to the decisive backend effect. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for firmware images, partition tables, boot chains, update packages, extracted filesystems, embedded configs, and device-facing trust boundaries. Use when the user asks to unpack firmware, map partition layout, inspect bootloader or init chains, recover update keys or credentials, trace config loading, or explain how a device surface reaches the decisive artifact. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for AD CS, certificate templates, enrollment rights, EKUs, SAN controls, PKINIT, certificate mapping, and cert-based privilege paths. Use when the user asks about ESC-style abuse, certificate templates, enrollment agents, EKUs, SAN or subject controls, smartcard or PKINIT logon, CA policy, or how an issued cert turns into accepted privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render a completed diamond's work as a shareable, factual one-page "work receipt" (problem framed, assumptions tested, what was killed vs kept) carrying an origin line + a volitional onward-handoff data flow. Read-only. Consults the attribution registry per `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/engine/render-conventions.md` consent + privacy gate. Follows the render fleet's shared conventions + consent gate (Check 43 applies via the `-render` name); a standalone shareable-artifact generator, NOT a `/render` dispatcher target. Audience fixed `external` (a hand-it-over artifact).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically challenge current assumptions before major decisions. Counters confirmation bias, groupthink, and overconfidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds probability-weighted valuation models with multiple exit scenarios, timing assumptions, and risk-adjusted returns. Use when building growth equity valuations, modeling scenario-weighted outcomes, or analyzing risk-adjusted returns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds corporate scenario planning models with macro assumption sets, strategic response options, and contingency plan development. Use when building scenario frameworks, planning strategic responses, or developing contingency strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures debt maturity analysis with refinancing risk, market access assumptions, and liability management opportunities. Use when analyzing maturity walls, planning refinancing, or optimizing debt tenor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds base, upside, and downside operating scenarios with key assumption sensitivity and return distribution analysis. Use when building operating cases, stress testing projections, or presenting scenario analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures CDD with market sizing, customer concentration, competitive dynamics, and growth sustainability analysis. Use when conducting commercial DD, validating market assumptions, or assessing revenue durability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates rating agency methodology application with loss model inputs, correlation assumptions, and tranche-level credit assessment. Use when analyzing structured product ratings, comparing agency methodologies, or assessing rating sensitivity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates assumption, rejection, and assignment decisions for executory contracts and unexpired leases in bankruptcy. Use when analyzing contract decisions, evaluating lease rejections, or modeling cure cost exposure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds LP commitment pacing with deployment curves, distribution assumptions, and NAV projection for portfolio planning. Use when modeling commitment pacing, projecting LP cash flows, or planning new fund allocations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates commodity price exposure with forward curve analysis, hedging strategies, and break-even price sensitivity. Use when analyzing commodity risk, designing hedging programs, or stress testing price assumptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-critique specification documents using extended thinking — surfaces hidden assumptions, contradictions, missing edge cases, and scope creep before implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ultra-granular code analysis for deep architectural context building. Line-by-line and block-by-block analysis using First Principles, 5 Whys, 5 Hows methodology at micro scale. Builds mental models, tracks invariants and assumptions, and maps cross-function call flows for security audit preparation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Socratic design refinement before implementation — challenges assumptions, surfaces alternatives, identifies risks before code is written

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prevent AI hallucination and ensure evidence-based responses when analyzing code or making suggestions. Use when: analyzing code, making recommendations, providing options, or when user asks about confidence/certainty. Keywords: certainty, assumption, inference, evidence, source, 確定性, 推測, 假設, 來源, 證據.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exposes Claude's reasoning chain as an auditable, decomposable artifact. Quick mode (default) gives assumption inventory + weakest-link in 2 stages. Full mode (--full) adds decision branching, confidence decomposition, and falsification conditions. Triggers on "왜 그렇게 생각해", "reasoning", "근거", "show your work", "어떻게 그 결론이", "trace", "판단 근거", "why do you think that".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prevents premature execution on ambiguous requests. Analyzes request clarity using 5W1H decomposition, surfaces hidden assumptions, and generates structured clarifying questions before work begins. Use at the start of any non-trivial task, or when a request could be interpreted multiple ways. Triggers on "뭘 원하는건지", "요구사항 정리", "clarify", "what exactly", "scope", "requirements", "정확히 뭘", "before we start".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate probability-weighted alternative options that challenge default thinking. Forces unconventional alternatives and exposes hidden assumptions behind the "obvious" choice. For decision-point analysis, NOT full design exploration. Triggers on "대안", "alternatives", "옵션 뽑아", "options", "어떤 방법이", "아이디어", "다른 방법", "선택지".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trains the HUMAN user's critical thinking through four modes: drill (argument-analysis items with a single defensible answer, judge stance), scene (Socratic exploration of synthetic scenes or user-supplied material, no verdicts on interpretations; includes a configure track — design the information request and verification plan for a decision before any analysis), expedition (guided audit of impossible-tier problems from verified packs), and detective (a runtime-generated multi-layer case worked as an escape room, guide-and-judge stance). Use when the user wants to practice critical thinking, analyze arguments, hunt assumptions, examine bias, train reasoning, or decide what information a decision needs first. Triggers: critical thinking practice, train my thinking, drill, scene, byom, configure, information plan, what would I need to know, spot manipulation tactics, scam literacy, 批判思考練習, 話術辨識, detective, 查案, 破案, 偵探.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when stress-testing a proposal, plan, architecture or decision before committing to it, such as pre-mortems, assumption audits, "should we even do this?" questions, or when everyone agrees too easily. Not for code review; it challenges strategy, approach and hidden risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。