「assumption」の検索結果

Extract and risk-rate hidden assumptions in a product brief or PRD. Use when asked to review a product brief for assumptions, audit a PRD for risks, find hidden assumptions, validate product plans, or run an assumption analysis. Produces a prioritised assumption map with confidence and impact scores, recommended validation methods, and critical assumption flags.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads a cash forecast (spreadsheet, model export, pasted table or the narrative that accompanies it) and returns a DRAFT assumptions sheet: every assumption the forecast rests on, stated or implied by the figures, with its value as read, its location in the model, the cash lines it drives, its stated source or "not stated", the evidence that would test it, an owner, and one neutral challenge question, so a reviewer can work through the assumptions one by one. Use when the user asks to "list the assumptions behind this cash forecast", "what is this cash flow forecast assuming", "prepare the challenge questions for the treasury review", "pull out the drivers of the 13-week cash forecast" or "build an assumptions register for the liquidity plan". Do not use for actuals against budget by line, use budget-variance-explainer instead; do not use for the case behind a capital request, use capex-request-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: assumptions audit, audit assumptions, check for hidden assumptions, plan/ticket has ambiguous scope edges, pre-flight before finalizing a ticket, unstated assumptions, or 'what am I assuming'. Surfaces unstated assumptions, ambiguous scope edges, and untested preconditions in a finished plan/ticket/ADR before it is handed to Builder. Optional pass — Architect judges when to apply it; not a mandatory gate on every ticket.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Surface every assumption embedded in a plan, strategy, or document, assess how critical and how validated each one is, and identify which ones to test first. Load when the user asks to map assumptions, surface hidden beliefs, find what must be true for this to work, run an assumption audit, or when deep-thinking diagnoses an assumption frame. Also triggers on "what are we assuming", "what must be true for this to work", or "find the untested beliefs". Based on David Bland and Alex Osterwalder's assumption mapping method from Testing Business Ideas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Surface the hidden assumptions a plan or belief rests on, then test what happens when each one is wrong. Use when asked what am I assuming here, check my assumptions, what if I'm wrong about, or stress-test my thinking. Produces the unstated assumptions your conclusion depends on (ranked by how load-bearing they are), a flip of each to see which one breaking would change everything, and the cheapest way to check the riskiest ones — because the assumption you didn't know you were making is what sinks plans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a framed and root-caused problem needs its assumptions made explicit before design or planning begins — explicit Assumptions, Unknowns, and a Validation plan. This should trigger when an issue's Assumption Analysis point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to surface hidden assumptions and unknowns before committing to an approach. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a mathematical-modeling paper's model-assumption section against the complete problem statement. Diagnose whether each assumption is necessary, evidence-based, compatible with the task, appropriately simplified, and usable by the later model. Use for assumption review, not automatic full-paper review or unsupported assumption generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

plan artifact がある時のみ、plan 中の assumption / open question が実装で解消された証拠を diff・PR 本文と突合する evidence-sufficiency 観点。解消されないまま残った前提・未記録の新規 Unknown を検出する。plan 欠損時は発火しない（Pre-execution Gate）。plan 欠損でも PR 本文に前提が inline 列挙されていれば列挙分のみ部分評価し、計画 issue の bare 参照だけなら skip する

Prioritize assumptions using an Impact × Risk matrix and suggest experiments for each. Use when triaging a list of assumptions, deciding what to test first, or applying the assumption prioritization canvas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RAID log methodology with decision extraction from emails and meeting notes. Use when asked to identify risks, log assumptions, track issues, extract decisions from correspondence, create or update a RAID log, escalate a risk to an issue, assess project risks, validate or challenge assumptions, or capture scope-relevant decisions. Also triggers when the user pastes email chains and asks what decisions were made, or needs to find buried decisions and untested assumptions in correspondence. Trigger on: 'risk report', 'RAID log', 'what are the risks', 'what decisions were made', 'update the risk register', 'what assumptions are we making', 'what could go wrong', 'flag any issues', 'extract decisions from these emails'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Axiom — First-Principles Assumption Auditor / 第一性原理拆解器 workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs First-principles assumption auditor. Classifies each hidden assumption (fact / convention / belief / interest-driven), ranks by fragility × impact, and rebuilds conclusions from verified premises. Bilingual: auto-detects Chinese or English and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Axiom — First-Principles Assumption Auditor / 第一性原理拆解器 workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs First-principles assumption auditor. Classifies each hidden assumption (fact / convention / belief / interest-driven), ranks by fragility × impact, and rebuilds conclusions from verified premises. Bilingual: auto-detects Chinese or English and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts Assignment and Assumption Agreements transferring contractual rights and obligations from assignor to assignee in asset purchase transactions. Covers assignment mechanics, liability assumption with temporal cutoff, third-party consent handling, reps and warranties, indemnification, and Exhibit A contract schedule. Trigger keywords: "assignment and assumption", "contract transfer", "assign contracts", "assume obligations", "asset purchase closing document", "assignor assignee agreement".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract a thesis's load-bearing assumptions and scan for internal contradictions — the falsifiable claims the bull case requires, what would falsify each, and where the thesis's own Risks / Bear Case / research already argue against it. Use when user says "assumptions", "what must be true", "load-bearing assumptions", or "does [TICKER] contradict itself".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify risky assumptions for a feature idea in an existing product across Value, Usability, Viability, and Feasibility. Uses multi-perspective devil's advocate thinking. Use when stress-testing a feature idea, doing risk assessment, or preparing for assumption mapping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify risky assumptions for a new product idea across 8 risk categories including Go-to-Market, Strategy, and Team. Use when evaluating startup risks, assessing a new product concept, or mapping assumptions for a new venture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract every hidden assumption from a plan or document and put a price on each one — what it costs if wrong, what it costs to test. Use when about to commit to anything whose author says 'obviously' or whose spreadsheet has hardcoded cells: the bounty hunt makes the invisible load-bearing beliefs explicit and tells you which three to test this week. Produces the assumption ledger (priced and ranked), the cheapest test for each dangerous one, and the document's honest confidence statement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grounded in first principles, rigorously examine and refine a user's plan, task, decision, goal, strategy, proposal, or idea through structured, progressively deeper questioning, in order to bridge the gap between the User and the Agent. Use when the user explicitly requests grilling, challenge, pressure-testing, cross-examination, red-team review, pre-mortem analysis, or a decision audit. The goal is to uncover unclear objectives, hidden assumptions, contradictions, weak evidence, missing information, overlooked constraints, dependencies, risks, trade-offs, failure modes, and misalignment between intended outcomes and likely real-world results. Begin by establishing a shared understanding of the user's actual intent, goals, constraints, and success criteria. Ask focused, high-leverage questions rather than broad or repetitive ones. Adapt each question based on previous answers, probing deeper where uncertainty, unsupported assumptions, or strategic weaknesses remain. Regularly summarize the current understanding of the user's intent and position to confirm alignment, expose misunderstandings, and refine the problem or goal definition. Distinguish facts, assumptions, hypotheses, and unknowns. Challenge reasoning rigorously while remaining constructive, respectful, and solution-oriented. Continue until the reasoning is internally coherent, evidence-aware, constraint-conscious, risk-assessed, and translated into a clearer, more actionable goal, decision, or plan. Ultimately, achieving the super-alignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and challenge implicit assumptions in plans, proposals, and technical decisions. Use when strategic-cto-mentor needs to surface hidden assumptions and wishful thinking before they become costly mistakes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prioritize assumptions by risk and importance. Use after assumption mapping to decide what to test first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design the smallest viable test to validate or invalidate a critical assumption. Based on Torres's assumption testing framework, organized by Gilad's AFTER model (Assessment → Fact-Finding → Tests → Experiments → Release Results).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI intuitive exploration for approaching unknown codebases, problems, or systems without preconceptions. Adapts the Coordinate Remote Viewing protocol to AI investigation: cooldown (clear assumptions), staged data gathering (raw signals → dimensional → analytical), AOL management (separating observations from premature labels), and structured review. Use when investigating an unfamiliar codebase with unknown architecture, debugging a problem where premature hypotheses could mislead, exploring a domain with limited context, or when previous attempts have been led astray by assumptions and "beginner's mind" would be more productive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when surfacing the assumptions underlying an analytical judgment, the user asks "what are we assuming?" / "are these assumptions still valid?", or before publishing a high-impact assessment. Standard SAT applied during major assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts an Assignment and Assumption of Leases transferring tenant leases from seller (Assignor) to buyer (Assignee) as a closing document to a commercial property PSA. Trigger when closing a commercial property sale with existing tenant leases or when a user needs lease assignment/assumption language for a real estate transaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。