「automated」の検索結果

Designs and implements data retention schedules compliant with GDPR Article 5(1)(e) storage limitation principle. Maps data categories to retention periods with legal basis justification, regulatory minimum holding periods, and automated review triggers for schedule maintenance. Activate for retention policy, storage limitation, data lifecycle, retention period queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Integrates Records of Processing Activities with privacy management platforms including OneTrust, TrustArc, Collibra, and DataGrail. Covers API-based synchronization, data mapping import, and automated RoPA population from enterprise tools. Activate for RoPA tool setup, OneTrust integration, TrustArc sync, privacy platform configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures privacy settings for enterprise HR systems including SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, and BambooHR. Covers role-based access controls, automated data retention enforcement, cross-border transfer configurations, audit logging, data subject rights facilitation, and field-level security. Keywords: HR system, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, BambooHR, RBAC, retention automation, cross-border transfer, privacy configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a multi-channel DSAR intake system supporting web form, email, phone, and in-person requests with identity verification tiers, automated routing logic, SLA tracking, and response generation. Activate for DSAR intake, rights request portal, multi-channel intake, SLA tracking, request management queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implementation guide for Global Privacy Control (GPC) automated opt-out signal per CPRA Section 1798.135(e). Covers Sec-GPC HTTP header detection, JavaScript navigator.globalPrivacyControl API, and state-specific requirements for CA, CO, CT, MT, TX, and OR. Includes server-side detection code and compliance mapping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements data lineage tracking for privacy compliance including origin tracking, transformation logging, access auditing, deletion verification, and cross-system lineage graphs. Covers source-to-sink mapping, GDPR Art. 30 RoPA integration, automated lineage discovery, and breach impact scoping. Keywords: data lineage, data provenance, data flow mapping, transformation logging, deletion verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements data classification labels and tagging systems including metadata tagging, DLP integration, automated label propagation, user-applied labels, and label inheritance rules. Covers Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels and enterprise labeling architecture. Keywords: data labeling, sensitivity labels, metadata tagging, DLP integration, label propagation, Purview, classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated cookie consent validation using Selenium and Playwright. Covers banner interaction testing, consent state verification, tag firing audit after consent choices, regression testing for cookie compliance, and CI/CD pipeline integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates GDPR Article 30(1) Records of Processing Activities (RoPA) for data controllers with all seven mandatory fields: controller identity and contact details, processing purposes, data subject categories, personal data categories, recipient categories, third country transfers, and retention periods. Includes Python generator for automated RoPA creation. Activate for controller RoPA, Art. 30(1), processing records, data mapping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements CPRA Section 1798.135 opt-out preference signal handling, covering Global Privacy Control (GPC) technical detection, automated signal honoring, cross-device consistency, and the relationship between browser signals and explicit consumer choices. Activate for GPC, opt-out preference signal, CPRA 1798.135, browser privacy signal, Do Not Sell queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive methodology for auditing website cookies and tracking technologies. Covers automated scanning, cookie categorization, lifecycle documentation, and compliance gap analysis referencing the Planet49 CJEU ruling (C-673/17).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements strict data minimization and retention limits for children's personal data under GDPR Art. 5(1)(c), Recital 38, UK AADC Standard 8, and COPPA Section 312.7. Covers strict necessity testing, shorter retention periods, limited profiling, parental dashboard design, and automated deletion. Keywords: data minimization, children, retention, necessity test, parental dashboard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts Data Protection Impact Assessments for AI and ML systems per EDPB Guidelines 04/2025 on AI processing. Covers training data lawfulness evaluation, model risk assessment, automated decision triggers, and AI-specific DPIA methodology. Keywords: AI DPIA, machine learning impact assessment, EDPB AI guidelines, model risk, training data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated cleanup of unused AWS resources to reduce costs

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated end-to-end UI testing and verification on an Android Emulator using ADB.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build automated evaluation suites for AI agents using golden datasets, rubrics, and regression gates. Use when shipping agent features, validating prompt changes, or gating deployments on quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically creates user-facing changelogs from git commits by analyzing commit history, categorizing changes, and transforming technical commits into clear, customer-friendly release notes. Turns hours of manual changelog writing into minutes of automated generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically organizes invoices and receipts for tax preparation by reading messy files, extracting key information, renaming them consistently, and sorting them into logical folders. Turns hours of manual bookkeeping into minutes of automated organization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write code through a disciplined, BDD-framed Test-Driven Development loop: build a behavior test list, then drive each behavior through red-green-refactor with an enforced observed-failure gate. Use when the user wants to implement, build, or write code test-first, "do TDD", follow "red-green-refactor", drive code from tests, choose the next test by the Transformation Priority Premise (TPP) or ZOMBIES ordering, or grow a feature behavior-by-behavior with tests leading. This skill writes and changes code; it does not produce a test plan document (use automated-test-planning, or manual-test-planning for a plan a person runs by hand), review or audit existing code (use code-review), restructure existing code outside a TDD loop (use refactor, or plan-a-change to plan a multi-module restructure), specify what a feature should do (use plan-a-feature), or find the root cause of a bug (use investigate). Runs its loop to completion without pausing for review; to review each behavior as it lands, use pairing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a standalone test plan by analyzing code for test coverage gaps and edge cases. Use when you need to create, generate, or draft a test plan for a branch, need to analyze test coverage, or need to identify what tests to write for specific files or directories. Does not produce a plain-language plan for a person to run tests by hand — use manual-test-planning for that. Does not write test code — use tdd to implement behavior test-first. Does not refine existing plans — use iterative-plan-review. Does not review code quality, security, or style — use code-review for full code review. Does not evaluate architectural testability or structural coupling — use architectural-analysis for architectural assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs deep architectural analysis of a specified module, directory, or feature area by examining structural coupling, data flow, concurrency patterns, risk, and SOLID alignment. Use when the user wants to assess, evaluate, or review the architecture, design quality, dependency structure, coupling, cohesion, or technical debt of an existing part of the codebase. Not for investigating specific bugs, runtime errors, or failures — use investigate. Not for test planning — use automated-test-planning. Not for file-level code review — use code-review. Not for researching open-ended options, prior art, or how something works — use research. Not for designing a new interface or contract — use design-an-api. Not for planning the change its findings imply — use plan-a-change. Not for discovering bounded contexts, ubiquitous language, or where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Not for writing documentation or architectural decision records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to run Codex CLI (codex exec, codex resume) or references OpenAI Codex for code analysis, refactoring, or automated editing

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shioaji Taiwan financial trading API guide. Use when trading stocks/futures/options on Taiwan markets, subscribing to real-time market data, querying account info, or building automated trading systems. Shioaji 台灣金融交易 API 指南。適用於：股票/期貨/選擇權交易、即時行情訂閱、帳務查詢、自動交易系統開發。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。