「claims」の検索結果

Generate navigable semantic maps from PDF documents. Extracts section structure via font analysis, then runs LLM extraction per section for claims, symbols, and dependencies — all page-anchored. Produces _MAP.md (progressive disclosure), .symbols.json (definition index), .anchors.json (claim references), and a _USAGE.md snippet for CLAUDE.md. Use when analyzing papers, specs, or legal docs; when asked to "map this document", "index this PDF", "what does this paper say"; or when a coding agent needs grounded reference material from a PDF source. Analogous to tree-sitting but for prose documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze liquid markets with a strict ICT/SMC framework that combines multi-timeframe bias, liquidity sweeps, displacement, close-confirmed MSS/BOS, FVG/OB/Breaker/OTE retracements, premium-discount location, session timing, invalidation, targets, and risk-to-reward. Use for ICT chart reviews, live-market analysis, OHLCV scans, or validating a user's trade thesis. Return an auditable setup status and conditional plan; do not use for generic indicator analysis, order execution, or claims of proven institutional intent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the empiricist, skeptical, and practical reasoning of David Hume, 18th-century Scottish philosopher. Use this skill whenever you encounter questions about epistemology, causality, human nature, moral philosophy, political authority, or the limits of rational knowledge. Trigger this skill when the user is grappling with abstract theories that need grounding, evaluating causal claims, discussing the role of emotion vs. reason in decision-making, or questioning the legitimacy of institutions. Even if the user doesn't name Hume, apply his frameworks (like Hume's Fork or the Impression Test) to cut through metaphysical speculation, ground arguments in observable experience, and recognize that reason is ultimately guided by human sentiment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Judge claims through evidence and alternatives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned product-marketing context discipline. Use when a project needs a shared record of product, audience, ICP, positioning, objections, customer language, proof, and goals, or when that record needs updating. NOT FOR: writing a campaign (use suede-campaign-in-a-box), conducting new customer interviews (use suede-customer-research), or publishing brand claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede Labs skill that prepares a song for sync pitching: scene and emotional angles, a supervisor-facing one-sheet, an exists/missing/unknown asset checklist covering master, instrumental, clean, and stems, screened lyric flags, mood tags, and the open clearance questions kept in their own labeled pile. Use when a track is headed for film, TV, ads, games, trailers, or creator campaigns; when a music supervisor, sync agent, or brand asks what a song is and whether it can be used; or when someone asks for a one-sheet, pitch email, or sync package for a release. Prepares review-ready materials only: never claims clearance, promises placement, or sends outreach. NOT FOR: finding and organizing the rights gaps behind an open clearance question (use suede-rights-audit); building the rights transfer package (use suede-rights-passport); linting the release folder itself (use suede-release-linter); a full rollout campaign (use suede-campaign-in-a-box).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-affiliated marketing deliberation that applies documented public frameworks through clearly labeled simulated advisors, surfaces disagreements, and synthesizes a decision. Use when the user wants multiple expert lenses on one bounded marketing question. NOT FOR: factual claims about a living person's private views, primary research (use suede-customer-research), or executing the selected tactic (route to the relevant public Suede skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify before claiming completion. No claims without fresh verification evidence. Use before marking work done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing iOS (Swift), Android (Kotlin) or Flutter changes - token storage, ATS and cleartext config, TLS trust, exported components, deep links, WebView JavaScript bridges, certificate pinning claims, secrets bundled in the app, Firebase rules

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence rules for completion claims. Use before ticking an acceptance criterion, ending an implementation run, or writing anything that says something works, passes or is fixed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How the Strategist works with the user to turn their own trading idea into explicit rules, backtest it honestly on Hyperliquid candle and funding history, and paper-trade it on testnet through the desk lifecycle. Method only - the desk ships no strategies and makes no return claims. Use when the user wants to design, test, compare or paper-trade an idea.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing self-media videos, scripts, covers, subtitles, voiceover, product links, account copy, comments, articles, or publishing packages for platform violation risk; especially before final delivery or publishing after video production or clipping. Covers e-commerce product consistency, Qianchuan material quality, regulated qualifications, efficacy claims, prices, gifts, activities, and pre-selection risk across WeChat, Douyin, Kuaishou, Bilibili, Xiaohongshu, TikTok, and related platforms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs, builds, or refactors user-facing web or application interfaces with deliberate visual direction, typography, color and spacing tokens, content hierarchy, responsive behavior, accessible interaction states, and real rendered-surface verification. Use for pages, components, dashboards, landing pages, design systems, and frontend polish. Not for backend logic, API-only work, or visual claims that cannot be rendered or inspected.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs consensus, quorums, leases, idempotency, and CRDTs. Use when facing split brain, fencing tokens, exactly-once claims, duplicate retries, stale reads, or leader flapping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a source evaluation protocol using lateral reading and credibility checks for digital information. Use when students need to evaluate websites, online sources, or social media claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check an educational practice or task for cultural bias, WEIRD assumptions, and cross-cultural validity. Use when adapting resources for diverse contexts or questioning universal claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a Funhouse Mirror activity where students use their own domain expertise to detect AI distortions, omissions, and overconfidence. Use when students know a subject well enough to evaluate AI claims about it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a fact-checking protocol for AI-generated text, extending SIFT with AI-specific adaptations for hallucination detection. Use when students need to verify AI claims and citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query patent bibliographic (catalog) information from the Nexscope patent database by patent ID or publication number. Triggered when users mention patent bibliographic info queries, patent catalog information, patent applicant queries, patent inventor queries, patent classification codes, patent abstract retrieval, patent citation analysis, patent priority claims, patent application citations, patent examiner information, patent bibliographic data, inventor lookup, applicant lookup, patent classification, patent metadata, Nexscope, or patent citations. Even if the user does not explicitly mention "bibliographic info," this skill should be triggered whenever their need involves querying detailed metadata for a specific patent by patent ID or publication number.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write and rewrite Turkish so it reads as native Turkish rather than translated English. Use for Turkish marketing copy, product and UI text, localization, documentation, support, legal or security prose, and reviews of AI-written Turkish. Detect translationese, copied clause structure, nominalization, wrong case and collocations, generic helper verbs, SaaS and sales calques, jargon leakage, forced slogans, corporate abstraction, cross-sector template residue, unsupported operational claims, and page-level repetition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze WeChat Mini Program platform constraints and evidence layers for an idea or existing repository, including source configuration, build output, WeChat DevTools loading, device behavior, permissions, privacy declarations, cloud or backend linkage, upload, trial, review, and production status. Use when users ask about WeChat-specific configuration, project roots, compile paths, capability permissions, privacy compliance, official platform rules, upload or release readiness, or why source and platform behavior differ. Performs read-only evidence classification by default, verifies time-sensitive or high-risk claims against current official WeChat sources, redacts identifiers and secrets, and never upgrades one evidence layer into another.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify mini-program implementations and fixes with risk-calibrated evidence across static checks, unit tests, integration tests, state matrices, simulators, real devices, cloud environments, and release artifacts. Use when users ask to test, validate, accept, regression-check, quality-check, confirm readiness, or determine whether a mini-program feature is actually complete. Binds results to a source and build fingerprint, records commands and observable evidence, separates passed, failed, blocked, and not-run layers, prioritizes the next highest-information check, and never converts local success into device, cloud, release, or formal acceptance claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, preview, implement, and assess mini-program interfaces against an approved prototype, screenshot, visual reference, design system, or bounded UI request while preserving product semantics and existing accepted behavior. Use when users ask to reproduce a mini-program screen, refine visual hierarchy, adapt layouts across device sizes, handle safe areas or keyboards, inspect touch targets, scrolling, media, or gesture conflicts, compare an implementation with a reference, or prepare a device-verification matrix. Separates proposed visual previews, user approval, source integration, local checks, and real-device evidence; never invents product functionality for visual completeness or claims device validation without device-specific proof.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。