「compare」の検索結果

Drive structured autoresearch iteration after evo:discover and the baseline commit. Use when the user invokes /evo:optimize or asks to try ideas, try variants, run experiments, use available GPUs, improve the current best/frontier, continue an evo search, or compare candidate changes in an evo workspace. The orchestrator plans and spawns optimization subagents; candidate edits/runs belong to those subagents. Width is set via subagents=N (1 for serial workloads, larger for parallel); the loop's structural value applies at any width.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gated checklist to choose or review a library, framework, storage, data format, model, build-vs-buy or architecture. Run favorites-search before external research when installed. Compare candidates and trade-offs; select within authorization or return user-owned choices. Use for 用哪个 / 选什么框架 / 要不要自建 / A 还是 B / 这个方案行不行 and before committing to one. Research reports → deep-research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Batch-generate and compare visual design directions so a user can choose the style they actually want. Use when the user says they cannot describe an abstract visual style, asks for many style options, wants to choose from generated UI/design-system images, rejects outputs as too colorful/too dead/too generic, or needs an existing UI/design system evolved without discarding current assets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits already-rendered UI and Markdown/Obsidian image layout — web app, deck/slide, dashboard, design-system, or Electron/native app — via real-browser/native-app journeys and a Playwright sweep. Use after UI implementation to find typography, overflow, responsive, routing, data-viz, browser-output, or native-shell defects, or to compare a render against a reference. Not for greenfield UI design (use ui-designer) or QA-program setup (use qa-expert).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, improve, and review interfaces for websites, apps, dashboards, and components: explore distinct design directions, compare styles side by side, and refine visual hierarchy against real screenshots. Delivers comparison pages, design notes, mockups, or working interfaces. Use for new interface design, style comparison, visual polish, screenshot recreation, or interface review. Not for business logic, APIs, builds, or code cleanup without visible UI changes. If oil-ui-pro is installed, use oil-ui-pro instead. 设计、改进和评审网站、App、后台与组件的界面，完成设计方向探索、多风格同屏比较、视觉层级和基于实际画面的迭代；按请求交付对比页、设计说明、设计稿或可运行界面。当用户需要新界面设计、比较不同设计风格、视觉精修、截图还原或界面评审时使用。只负责设计判断，组件归属、数据流、状态正确性和测试等代码实现质量不在范围内。不用于纯业务逻辑、接口、构建部署、无界面行为变化的代码整理、单独绘制普通插画或操作现有网站。已安装 oil-ui-pro 时交给 oil-ui-pro。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze competitors and create competitive landscape documentation with feature matrices, positioning maps, and strategic recommendations. Use when asked to analyze competitors, create competitive analysis, compare features with competitors, build a competitive landscape, track competitive positioning, or prepare sales battlecard inputs. Produces structured competitor profiles, feature comparison matrix, win/loss analysis, and prioritised strategic recommendations. For a one-off teardown of a single rival use competitor-teardown; for a recurring market briefing use competitive-intelligence-monitor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a fast, honest competitive scan — the dimension table built from public evidence (sites, docs, pricing pages, changelogs, reviews), the claims-vs-observed discipline, and the so-what synthesis that ends in moves, not a landscape mural. Use when asked what are competitors doing, quick scan of these three rivals, how does our pricing/feature set compare, or prep the competitive slide honestly. Produces the evidence-based comparison table, the marketing-vs-reality flags, the so-what synthesis, and the staleness date.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compute what a degree will actually cost — sticker minus real aid, inflated per year, split into cash and loans, with the loan's decade-long monthly tail made visible before enrollment instead of after. Use when asked what will college really cost, compare these two offers' real prices, how much loan payment after graduation, or is this school affordable. Produces the all-in number from the script, the offer-letter decode (grants vs loans untangled), the monthly-tail reality check, and the two-school comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare for China's annual individual income tax reconciliation (个税年度汇算): check income, deductions and special additional deductions, compare the two treatments of a year-end bonus, and estimate the refund or amount to pay before filing in the 个人所得税 app. Use when asked 个税汇算怎么弄, 年终奖单独计税还是合并, 我能退多少税, 专项附加扣除, or how does China's annual tax reconciliation work. Produces a filing checklist, the deductions the person may be missing, a bonus comparison, the estimate with workings, and deadlines. Not tax advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare the total cost of car ownership across buy-new, buy-used, lease, and keep-your-current-car — depreciation, insurance, maintenance ramp, and fuel over a real horizon, not just the monthly payment. Use when asked should I lease or buy a car, is it cheaper to keep my old car, what does this car really cost per month, or new vs used total cost. Produces the ranked scenario totals, per-month true cost, the assumption ledger, and the not-modeled list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse a construction bid or tender package for scope gaps, risk-shifting exclusions, unit-rate red flags, and front-loading in the schedule of values. Use when asked to review a bid, level bids, check a tender for gaps, compare sub quotes, or vet a schedule of values before award. Produces a structured bid review with a gap register, exclusion risk table, pricing red flags, and an award recommendation with pre-award clarifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

**WORKFLOW SKILL** - Evaluate AI agent skills using structured benchmarks with YAML specs, fixture isolation, and pluggable validators. USE FOR: run waza, waza help, run eval, run benchmark, evaluate skill, test agent, generate eval suite, init eval, compare results, score agent, agent evaluation, skill testing, cross-model comparison. DO NOT USE FOR: improving skill frontmatter (use waza dev), creating new skills from scratch (use skill-creator), token counting or budget checks (use waza tokens). INVOKES: Copilot SDK executor, mock engine, code/regex validators. FOR SINGLE OPERATIONS: use waza run directly for a single benchmark.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive workflow partner for creating, testing, and improving AI agent skills with waza. USE FOR: run my evals, check my skill, compare models, create eval suite, debug failing tests, is my skill ready, ship readiness, interpret results, improve score. DO NOT USE FOR: general coding, non-skill work, writing skill content (use skill-authoring), improving frontmatter only (use sensei).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze weekly marketing campaign performance data across channels. Use when analyzing multi-channel digital marketing data to calculate funnel metrics (CTR, CVR) and compare to benchmarks, compute cost and revenue efficiency metrics (ROAS, CPA, Net Profit), or get budget reallocation recommendations based on performance rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BOM (Bill of Materials) management for electronics projects — the workflow skill that coordinates DigiKey, Mouser, LCSC, element14, JLCPCB, PCBWay, and KiCad skills around a unified BOM lifecycle. Create, update, and maintain BOMs with part numbers, costs, quantities stored as KiCad symbol properties. ALWAYS trigger this skill for any task involving component sourcing, pricing, ordering, distributor searches, BOM export, or fabrication preparation — even if the user names a specific distributor or fab house (e.g. "search DigiKey for...", "generate JLCPCB BOM", "order from Mouser"). This skill analyzes the schematic for sourcing gaps, recommends which distributor/fab skills to call for each gap, and writes results back as symbol properties — the agent (or user) performs the actual searches via the called skills. Also trigger on phrases like "what parts do I need", "order components", "how much will this cost", "export for JLCPCB", "find parts for this board", "compare pricing", or "check stock".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search Newark, Farnell, and element14 for electronic components — find parts by MPN or distributor part number, check pricing/stock, download datasheets, analyze specifications. One unified API covers all three storefronts (Newark for US, Farnell for UK/EU, element14 for APAC). Free API key, simple query-parameter auth, no OAuth. Datasheets download directly from farnell.com CDN with no bot protection. Sync and maintain a local datasheets directory for a KiCad project, or use batch MPN-list seeding (`--mpn-list`) for bulk workflows without a project. Use this skill when the user mentions Newark, Farnell, element14, needs parts from a non-US distributor, wants to compare pricing across regions, or needs datasheets from a source that doesn't require complex API auth. For package cross-reference tables and BOM workflow, see the `bom` skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze KiCad projects and PDF schematics: schematics, PCB layouts, Gerbers, footprints, symbols, netlists, and design rules. Reviews designs for bugs, traces nets, cross-references schematic to PCB, extracts BOM data, checks DRC/ERC, DFM, power trees, and regulator circuits. Every finding carries a confidence label and evidence source with trust_summary rollup. Analyzes PDF schematics from dev boards, reference designs, eval kits, and datasheets. Supports KiCad 5–10. Use whenever the user mentions .kicad_sch, .kicad_pcb, .kicad_pro, PCB design review, schematic analysis, PDF schematics, reference designs, Gerber files, DRC/ERC, netlist issues, BOM extraction, signal tracing, power budget, DFM, or wants to understand, debug, compare, or review any hardware design. Also for "check my board", "review before fab", "what's wrong with my schematic", "is this ready to order", "check my power supply", "verify this circuit", OSHWA certification readiness, or any electronics/PCB design question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PCBWay PCB fabrication and assembly — turnkey/consigned assembly, design rules, ordering workflow. Alternative to JLCPCB for manufacturing. Use with KiCad. Use this skill when the user mentions PCBWay, needs turnkey assembly (PCBWay sources parts by MPN), has parts not available on LCSC, needs assembled boards with non-LCSC components, wants to compare PCBWay vs JLCPCB, or needs assembly with parts sourced globally rather than from LCSC only. For gerber/CPL export, stencil ordering, and BOM management, see the `bom` skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scholarly research companion using Knows sidecar spec (.knows.yaml). Generates, validates, reviews, queries, and compares structured research-paper sidecars, and fetches them from knows.academy. Use for academic literature search, survey synthesis, paper authoring assistance, and peer review with token-efficient claim/evidence/relation access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search academic literature and generate, validate, or compare Knows paper sidecars. Use for claim/evidence analysis and literature synthesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Captures before/after screenshots of web pages or elements for visual comparison. Use when user says "take before and after", "screenshot comparison", "visual diff", "PR screenshots", "compare old and new", or needs to document UI changes. Accepts two URLs (file://, http://, https://) or two image paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to measure performance baselines, detect regressions before/after PRs, and compare stack alternatives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codex-native multi-keyword Amazon opportunity scan using LaunchFast MCP. Use when the user wants to research 1-10 keywords, compare niches, or decide whether a product idea is a GO, INVESTIGATE, or PASS. Requires the LaunchFast MCP tool `research_products`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare independent opinions from several models or contexts without inflating agreement. Use when: wanting a second opinion or debate, or summarizing several reviewers' results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。