4,149 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Invoke the locally installed Grok Build CLI from Codex and return Grok's response. Use whenever the user asks Codex to call, consult, run, or delegate a prompt to Grok or Grok Build, including Grok web/X searches and agentic Grok tasks. This Skill covers only the invocation mechanism, process monitoring, and response capture; it does not prescribe the task itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compose IRQL (Incident Response Query Language) queries for Kusto cybersecurity investigations. Translates natural language hunting questions into composable IRQL pipelines using Get_*, Extract_*, and Enrich_* functions. WHEN: IRQL query, security hunt, threat hunting KQL, incident response query, compose hunting pipeline, failed logins, phishing investigation, lateral movement, process execution, file creation events.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a structured Azure incident response workflow for triage, diagnosis, mitigation, and root cause analysis. Use when operations or security teams need guided incident handling for Azure service symptoms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a production behavior-tree runtime (Blackboard, action/condition leaves, sequence/selector/parallel composites, decorators) and a Utility AI system (response curves — linear, exponential, sigmoid, quadratic — considerations, and action evaluators), plus hybrid BT-drives-Utility agents. Use when implementing a reusable behavior-tree or utility-based decision system, or tuning enemy/NPC decisions beyond a simple FSM, or when the user mentions behavior tree, blackboard, decorator, selector, sequence, tick status, utility AI, response/scoring curve, or consideration. For choosing between FSM/BT/steering or for pathfinding, use game-ai; for Unreal's BehaviorTree/Blackboard assets, use unreal-behavior-trees.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build production Roblox interfaces with ScreenGui/PlayerGui lifecycle, responsive UDim2 layouts, safe insets, reusable editable Instances, cross-device input and selection, restrained motion, cleanup, and multi-viewport verification. Use for Roblox HUDs, inventories, shops, settings, ability bars, ScrollingFrames, AutomaticSize, GuiService, gamepad focus, touch UI, or UI that clips, resets on respawn, looks generic, or was generated as one giant LocalScript.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build respawn-safe Roblox character systems around Players, CharacterAdded/CharacterRemoving, Humanoid, HumanoidRootPart, Animator, R6/R15 rigs, movement, animations and markers, death, tools, accessories, ownership, and custom characters. Use when character scripts break after respawn, cache stale Humanoids, control movement or velocity, load AnimationTracks, handle death, equip Tools, modify avatars, or support custom player rigs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer a construction request for information so the site can act on it — a direct answer, the drawing or specification reference that supports it, and an explicit statement of whether it changes cost or programme. Use when asked to respond to an RFI, answer a contractor query, or handle a request for information on site, or when RFIs keep coming back for clarification. Produces the answer with its reference, the cost and time implication stated, the instruction status, the distribution list, and the register entry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a community management playbook for a brand's social media channels. Use when asked to create guidelines for managing comments, DMs, and community interactions, define a moderation policy, or build response frameworks for social media community managers. Produces a complete playbook with response templates, escalation paths, moderation rules, and tone guidelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Win a chargeback dispute — read the reason code, assemble the evidence packet, and write the rebuttal that actually persuades the bank. Use when asked to fight a chargeback, respond to a payment dispute, write a chargeback rebuttal, or contest a customer chargeback. Produces the reason-code decode, the required-evidence checklist for that code, the structured rebuttal letter, and an honest read on whether this one is winnable — so you fight the right disputes and concede the rest. For merchants.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a sincere, effective apology to a customer, group, or the public. Use when asked to write an apology, say sorry to a customer or community, make amends after a mistake, or respond to a complaint with an apology. Produces a genuine apology — acknowledgement, taking responsibility, empathy for the impact, the concrete fix and prevention, and an offer to make it right — in the right tone, without excuses or non-apologies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Google SEO APIs: Search Console (Search Analytics, URL Inspection, Sitemaps), PageSpeed Insights v5, CrUX field data with 25-week history, Indexing API v3, and GA4 organic traffic. Provides real Google field data for Core Web Vitals, indexation status, search performance, and organic traffic trends. Use when user says "search console", "GSC", "PageSpeed", "CrUX", "field data", "indexing API", "GA4 organic", "URL inspection", "google api setup", "real CWV data", "impressions", "clicks", "CTR", "position data", "LCP", "INP", "CLS", "FCP", "TTFB", or "Lighthouse scores".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Google SEO APIs: Search Console (Search Analytics, URL Inspection, Sitemaps), PageSpeed Insights v5, CrUX field data with 25-week history, Indexing API v3, and GA4 organic traffic. Provides real Google field data for Core Web Vitals, indexation status, search performance, and organic traffic trends. Use when user says "search console", "GSC", "PageSpeed", "CrUX", "field data", "indexing API", "GA4 organic", "URL inspection", or "real CWV data".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate BurpSuite MCP Bridge for professional, authorized web testing. Use when Codex needs to inspect Burp live/history/logger/selection traffic, prioritize one target, retrieve a decisive request/response, intercept and edit a request or response before forwarding, replay one controlled mutation, manage temporary rewrite rules, import BChecks/Bambdas, export evidence, or diagnose the Windows Burp to WSL MCP connection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding WHERE to point SEO effort, not how to write a page. Triggers: a new site or brand with no rankings and no authority ("cold start", "starting from zero", "nobody knows us"), deciding what to double down on, a page or cluster that ranks but earns nothing, hunting emerging or newly-coined keywords before competitors arrive, "should we build a cluster or one page", "what do we write next", "we get impressions but no clicks", "our traffic plateaued despite publishing", whether to chase a head term at all, or turning any of it into recurring automation. Also use when asked why an SEO effort stalled despite consistent output. NOT for writing an article, keyword expansion mechanics, or auditing a single tactic for penalty risk.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting AISTATS author responses or author-reviewer discussion replies under OpenReview, covering text-only discussion, no-link guidance, no revised-paper upload, anonymity requirements, statistician-reviewer pushback patterns, and decision-focused clarification strategy for theory-plus-experiments papers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when responding to an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) conditional-accept decision — addressing the editor's letter within the short window, usually without a second referee round. Drafts a concise, decisive response and revision plan; it does not redo the analysis (see aeri-robustness / aeri-identification).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when responding to Advanced Materials reviewer reports and an editor's decision — major or minor revision, or a rejection with a resubmission or transfer path. Structures the response and the manuscript changes; does not perform the underlying new experiments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) decision letter arrives (R&R or conditional accept) and a response-to-referees letter plus a revision plan must be drafted. Plans and structures the response; it does not run the new analysis (aeja-identification / aeja-robustness) or the submission preflight.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an AEJ: Economic Policy decision letter (R&R or reject-and-resubmit) has arrived and a response-letter strategy and revision plan are needed. Structures the response to referees and editor with policy-relevance front and center; it does not run new estimation or redesign identification from scratch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting the ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) rebuttal — turning multiple anonymous reviews into one focused, anonymous response that fixes factual errors first, adds small confirmatory cross-modal results, concedes calibratedly, and stays inside policy (anonymous, no new external links), written for the area chair who decides.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting an ACM CCS rebuttal during the HotCRP author-response window, covering threat-model defenses, adaptive-attack objections, ethics and disclosure questions, anonymity constraints, adversarial reviewer pushback patterns, and decision-focused replies aimed at the meta-reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing the response document for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) Revise & Resubmit — structuring point-by-point replies that show the theory was genuinely strengthened, not just defended. Drafts the response; revise the manuscript's theory FIRST (amr-theory-development / amr-data-analysis) before writing the letter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when responding to 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) reviewer reports / an R&R — drafting a point-by-point response letter and 修改说明 that addresses accounting-measure construction, institutional/standard accuracy, identification, and information-mechanism concerns, while keeping the revision anonymous. Use only after the manuscript itself has been revised.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) revise-and-resubmit arrives — planning revisions that may include recoding field data, new experimental conditions, or deepened theorizing, and drafting the point-by-point response to an interdisciplinary reviewer panel. Drafts the response; it does not run new analysis (aos-data-analysis) or the final preflight (aos-submission).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。