「firm」の検索結果

Redesign GitHub README homepages or create project-native pure SVG, hybrid SVG-composed PNG/WebP, and opt-in animated GIF assets. Use when a user asks to beautify, redesign, rebrand, visually upgrade, simplify, or audit a GitHub README; create only a hero, section headers, diagrams, badges, motion graphics, showcase modules, or other README assets; or turn a repository homepage into a cohesive visual story. If whole-README work versus asset-only work is unclear, ask which scope the user wants. For hero-like assets where pure SVG and generated raster material are both viable, explain the tradeoffs and confirm the implementation before creating the asset.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VERIFY your changes work. Measure performance, CLS. Use BEFORE and AFTER making changes to confirm fixes. Includes ready-to-run scripts: measure-cls.ts, detect-flicker.ts

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VERIFY your changes work. Measure CLS, detect theme flicker, test visual stability, check performance. Use BEFORE and AFTER making changes to confirm fixes. Includes ready-to-run scripts: measure-cls.ts, detect-flicker.ts

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Final completion discipline including summary generation, plan document updates, and confirmation that all success criteria from the original plan are satisfied.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan structure validation, phase completeness checks, reference integrity verification, and artifact existence confirmation. Provides the structured verification layer ensuring GSD artifacts are well-formed and complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Senior embedded software engineer specializing in firmware and driver development for ARM Cortex-M microcontrollers (Teensy, STM32, nRF52, SAMD). Decades of experience writing reliable, optimized, and maintainable embedded code with deep expertise in memory barriers, DMA/cache coherency, interrupt-driven I/O, and peripheral drivers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a UI or design against WCAG 2.2 AA/AAA and ARIA patterns, returning criterion-referenced findings with severity and specific fixes. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, contrast verification, keyboard/screen-reader review, or wants to confirm a component meets POUR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Genre anatomy from John Truby's The Anatomy of Genres (类型解剖 / 类型节拍 / 混合类型 / 超越类型) — genres as beat systems with a life philosophy underneath; three rules (hit every beat of your genre, mix three or four genres, transcend the primary genre), the ladder and families of twelve genres (Horror 恐怖, Action 动作, Myth 神话, Memoir and Coming-of-Age 回忆录与成长, Science Fiction 科幻, Crime 犯罪, Comedy 喜剧, Western 西部, Gangster 黑帮, Fantasy 奇幻, Detective and Thriller 侦探与惊悚, Love 爱情), each with its hero/opponent/world/plot-shape template, beat list, hard rules with failure conditions, subgenres and transcendent paths, plus a genre-mixing worksheet and a diagnostic. Kept beside sw-truby-anatomy and the Field/Snyder page maps. Use when choosing or confirming a script's genre, when a genre story feels generic or misses the beats its audience expects, when mixing genres, when a horror lacks pressure, an action lacks plot, a love story lacks opposition or a detective story lacks reveals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose why Claude Code is (or isn't) prompting for permission. By default reads only repo-local layers (CLI project, CLI project-local, VSCode workspace). Host-global layers (CLI user `~/.claude/`, VSCode user settings) are read ONLY when the user explicitly confirms — those files may contain unrelated paths or secrets. Use when user says "why is it asking me to approve?", "permission check", "why am I getting prompts?", "bypass isn't working", "check my permissions". Read-only diagnostic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive adversarial audit of a theory, proof, math/econ paper, codebase, or set of claims — decompose into components, fan out independent skeptics that must return CONCRETE defects, adjudicate every finding with a separate judge, fix all confirmed defects, then re-verify. Use when correctness must be bulletproof and single-pass or round-by-round review is too slow and too shallow. Invoke for "audit this rigorously", "find ALL the bugs/gaps", "make this rock solid", "converge faster on correctness".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Commit the current work — runs the quality, consistency and passport gates, branches off main if needed, stages specific files, and writes a commit whose subject states what is now true. Pushes and opens a pull request only with --pr or when the user asks; never merges — a merge happens only when the user explicitly says to merge. Use ONLY on explicit commit intent — user says "commit", "let's commit this", "open a PR", or prefixes with `/commit`. Do NOT auto-invoke on vague end-of-task phrases ("we're done", "wrap up") — those require explicit confirmation first. Never force-pushes or skips hooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a structured response-to-referees document from a referee report and the revised manuscript. Maps each referee comment to the specific revision, classifies coverage (addressed / partially / deferred / disagreement), and drafts polite but firm responses. Use during the R&R (revise-and-resubmit) stage of paper revision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assemble a submission-ready replication package to the AEA Data and Code Availability Standard (DCAS) / openICPSR / Social Science Reproduction Platform expectations — standard replication README, dataset manifest, computational-requirements capture, a Table/Figure → script:line map, and a confidential-data deposit plan. Use when user says "build the replication package", "prepare the openICPSR deposit", "make the AEA data and code package", "DCAS compliance", "assemble the deposit for the journal", or after a paper is accepted and the journal's data editor needs the package. NOT a numeric verifier — it calls /audit-reproducibility to confirm claims reproduce before packaging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an external frontier-model referee (Claude Code -> a different vendor's frontier model via the Oracle CLI) on a paper, proof, estimator, or replication package -- and adjudicate what comes back. Use when the user says "send this to oracle", "get an external review", "run a referee round", "deep-check this proof", or before a submission when an independent second opinion is worth more than another in-house pass. Never launches bare: brief first, evidence-forcing prompt, coverage manifest, then CONFIRMED/REFUTED/DOWNGRADED triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Edit any video by conversation. Transcribe, cut, color grade, generate overlay animations, burn subtitles — for talking heads, montages, tutorials, travel, interviews. No presets, no menus. Ask questions, confirm the plan, execute, iterate, persist. Production-correctness rules are hard; everything else is artistic freedom.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before rejecting a proposal or reflexively agreeing, build the strongest faithful opposing case, state agreement conditions, then update or reaffirm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and improve the reliability posture of PaaS Applications (Azure Functions and Azure App Service). Scans deployed resources for zone redundancy, ZRS storage, health probes, and multi-region failover. Presents a feature-pivoted checklist, then drives staged remediation (CLI or IaC patches) end-to-end with user confirmation. WHEN: "assess reliability", "check reliability", "zone redundant", "multi-region failover", "high availability", "disaster recovery", "single points of failure", "reliability posture", "resiliency".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, deploy, operate, and troubleshoot Azure Local (formerly Azure Stack HCI): sizing and prerequisites, Arc registration, lifecycle updates, workloads (Azure Local VMs, AKS on Azure Local, images, disks, logical networks), SDN and network security, and failure triage — starting read-only and confirming before risky changes. WHEN: Azure Local, Azure Stack HCI, Arc resource bridge, custom location, Azure Local VM, Arc VM, AKS on Azure Local, AKS hybrid, SDN, Lifecycle Manager, Azure Local update, disconnected site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft crisis holding statements, journalist Q&A posture, and what-not-to-say guidance from confirmed incident facts, with a hard legal-counsel gate. Builds each statement through proven crisis-comms frameworks (holding-statement anatomy, SCCT, CAP order, the legitimate non-answer, bridge/flag/block).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs systematic root cause analysis to identify the true source of bugs, errors, and unexpected behavior through structured investigation phases — not just treating symptoms. Use when a user reports a bug, crash, error, or broken behavior and needs to debug, troubleshoot, or investigate why something is not working; especially for complex or intermittent issues across multiple components. Applies the Five Whys method, hypothesis-driven testing, stack trace analysis, git blame/log evidence gathering, and causal chain documentation to isolate and confirm root causes before applying any fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the scientific method to debugging by helping users form specific, testable hypotheses, design targeted experiments, and systematically confirm or reject theories to find root causes. Use when a user says their code isn't working, they're getting an error, something broke, they want to troubleshoot a bug, or they're trying to figure out what's causing an issue. Concrete actions include isolating failing components, forming and testing hypotheses, analyzing error messages, tracing execution paths, and interpreting test results to narrow down root causes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit Git configuration with one read-only baseline command, then propose confirmed, non-destructive fixes for identity, editor, and diff and merge tooling, with signing and safe.directory help only on request. Use when setting up or checking Git on a workstation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stage user-selected paths, confirm the exact staged set, and create one local Conventional Commit, or generate a commit message for staged changes without committing. Use when you want a guarded commit or a ready-to-paste message.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Challenge a confirmed task, decision, plan, or artifact through adaptive skeptical questions. Use when you need to expose assumptions before acting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。