857 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when checking a radiology or medical AI study design before drafting or submission. Reviews the analysis unit, cohort logic, leakage risks, comparator, validation strategy and reporting-guideline fit. AI-vs-expert benchmarks are /design-ai-benchmarking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running a systematic review and meta-analysis, DTA or intervention. Covers PROSPERO protocol, search, screening, extraction, risk of bias (QUADAS-3, RoB 2, ROBINS-I), bivariate/HSROC or random-effects pooling, forest plots, heterogeneity and PRISMA reporting. Topic scouting is /ma-scout.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authorized multi-stage attack-path planning and orchestration spanning reconnaissance, initial access, privilege escalation, lateral movement, and reporting. Entry point for full engagements and cross-phase operations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
XML-specified Android UI journey testing, interactive step execution, assertion verification, and JSON outcome reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Toolkit for styling artifacts with a theme. These artifacts can be slides, docs, reportings, HTML landing pages, etc. There are 10 pre-set themes with colors/fonts that you can apply to any artifact that has been creating, or can generate a new theme on-the-fly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ongoing vendor privacy compliance monitoring program. Covers annual reassessment procedures, continuous monitoring signals, contract renewal privacy triggers, performance metrics, KPIs, and vendor governance reporting dashboards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design privacy API patterns including data subject API for DSAR endpoints, consent API for preference management, deletion API with cascading delete orchestration, and audit API for compliance reporting. Provides OpenAPI specifications, error handling, rate limiting, and authentication patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Executes breach notification under HIPAA Breach Notification Rule (45 CFR 164.400-414). Covers 60-day individual notification, HHS/OCR reporting for breaches of 500+ individuals (immediate) and under 500 (annual log), state attorney general notification, media notification for 500+ in a single state, and breach risk assessment using the four-factor test. Keywords: HIPAA, breach notification, PHI, HHS, OCR, covered entity, business associate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides internal privacy audit program design and execution including risk-based audit planning, scope definition, fieldwork procedures, finding classification, evidence gathering, remediation tracking, and management reporting. Covers audit universe definition, annual audit plan, working papers, and closure verification. Keywords: internal audit, privacy audit, fieldwork, remediation, findings, audit plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages the organisational DPIA register tracking all Data Protection Impact Assessments across the enterprise. Covers DPIA lifecycle management, status tracking, review scheduling, Art. 35(11) periodic reassessment, and supervisory authority reporting. Implements a centralised register linking DPIAs to RoPA entries, risk registers, and mitigation plans. Keywords: DPIA register, DPIA tracking, Art. 35(11), review schedule, DPIA lifecycle, centralised register, DPIA portfolio management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides comprehensive controller self-assessment covering GDPR Articles 5-49 with scoring methodology and reporting format. Activate when conducting internal reviews or benchmarking maturity. Keywords: self-assessment, controller assessment, compliance questionnaire, scoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Framework for evaluating and selecting Consent Management Platforms (CMPs). Covers TCF v2.2 certification requirements, Global Privacy Control support, multi-regulation compliance (GDPR, CCPA, LGPD), A/B testing capabilities, API integration options, reporting features, and a structured vendor comparison methodology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides audit follow-up and verification processes including follow-up scheduling, remediation effectiveness testing, finding closure criteria, re-testing procedures, status reporting, and escalation of unremediated findings. Implements IIA Standard 2500 monitoring requirements and ISO 19011 follow-up guidance for privacy audit engagements. Keywords: audit follow-up, verification testing, finding closure, remediation effectiveness, re-testing, follow-up audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides audit findings remediation program management including finding prioritization by severity (critical, high, medium, low), owner assignment, remediation planning, deadline tracking, verification testing, closure criteria, escalation protocols, and management reporting. Covers remediation lifecycle from finding issuance to verified closure. Keywords: audit remediation, finding management, prioritization, verification testing, closure criteria, remediation tracking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route substantial coding or repository-review work through a two-stage Sol commander/verifier and separate Luna Max CLI worker. Use when the user explicitly asks Sol to direct or supervise Luna, explicitly requests this router, needs an isolated auditable Luna-owned implementation with a Sol review loop, or asks to diagnose or measure the router itself. Do not use merely because a task involves coding, verification, progress reporting, or token saving. For small or straightforward tasks, keep work in Sol unless the user explicitly requests Luna; router configuration, usage, and efficiency questions should use read-only inspection without launching a worker.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill retrieves upcoming earnings announcements for US stocks using the Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) API. Use this when the user requests earnings calendar data, wants to know which companies are reporting earnings in the upcoming week, or needs a weekly earnings review. The skill focuses on mid-cap and above companies (over $2B market cap) that have significant market impact, organizing the data by date and timing in a clean markdown table format. Supports multiple environments (CLI, Desktop, Web) with flexible API key management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Toolkit for styling artifacts with a theme. These artifacts can be slides, docs, reportings, HTML landing pages, etc. There are 10 pre-set themes with colors/fonts that you can apply to any artifact that has been creating, or can generate a new theme on-the-fly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Toolkit for styling artifacts with a theme. These artifacts can be slides, docs, reportings, HTML landing pages, etc. There are 10 pre-set themes with colors/fonts that you can apply to any artifact that has been creating, or can generate a new theme on-the-fly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build professional financial services data packs from various sources including CIMs, offering memorandums, SEC filings, web search, or MCP servers. Extract, normalize, and standardize financial data into investment committee-ready Excel workbooks with consistent structure, proper formatting, and documented assumptions. Use for M&A due diligence, private equity analysis, investment committee materials, and standardizing financial reporting across portfolio companies. Do not use for simple financial calculations or working with already-completed data packs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate, execute, and analyze tests for codebases, covering unit, integration, and end-to-end testing with coverage reporting. Use when the user requests testing or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Determine the TRUE cause of a failed retort run before attributing it. Ground-truth every failure (run its tests, read its agent logs, inspect its workspace) and classify it as an infrastructure false-fail, a genuine model miss, or an environment issue — never trust the gate verdict or a log signature alone. Use whenever a run is recorded failed (test_coverage=0 / gate fail), a pass rate looks low, or you're deciding whether a "failure" is real before reporting or proceeding.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Mining Geologist. Use when a task calls for Mining Geologist judgment. Reasons from deposit-type models (porphyry, VMS, SEDEX, orogenic Au, IOCG, skarn) through oriented core logging, domaining, variography, OK/MIK/LUC estimation, and Chain-of-Mining reconciliation to JORC Table 1, NI 43-101 Item 14, and CIM MRMR reporting; uses Leapfrog, GIM Suite/MX Deposit, and Parker F-series factors while treating support/compositing errors, batch QA/QC failures, OK smoothing bias, and Inferred-overclaim as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Health Economist. Use when a task calls for Health Economist judgment. Reasons from QALY/ICER and NMB opportunity-cost framing, NICE reference case and WTP bands, cohort Markov/PSM models with PSA (CEAC/CEAF), ISPOR transferability and DCE conjoint checklists, CHEERS 2022 and trial-based RCT-CEA reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Finite Element Analyst. Use when a task calls for Finite Element Analyst judgment. Reasons from discretization error, element technology, and constraint physics; runs mesh convergence and Richardson studies, Nastran/Abaqus/ANSYS workflows, RBE2/RBE3 and contact discipline, and ASME V&V 10 verification-before-validation reporting on governing QoIs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。