1,351 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
You are a PR optimization expert specializing in creating high-quality pull requests that facilitate efficient code reviews. Generate comprehensive PR descriptions, automate review processes, and ensu
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are a PR optimization expert specializing in creating high-quality pull requests that facilitate efficient code reviews. Generate comprehensive PR descriptions, automate review processes, and ensure PRs follow best practices for clarity, size, and reviewability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master software architect specializing in modern architecture patterns, clean architecture, microservices, event-driven systems, and DDD. Reviews system designs and code changes for architectural integrity, scalability, and maintainability. Use PROACTIVELY for architectural decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in secure backend coding practices specializing in input validation, authentication, and API security. Use PROACTIVELY for backend security implementations or security code reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews React Native TV apps for focus/D-pad navigation, 10-foot UI layout, TV playback/DRM integration, low-memory TV performance, and TV accessibility. Use when building, debugging, or reviewing react-native-tvos, Expo TV, Amazon Vega/Kepler, or React Native web TV targets where the issue depends on remote input, TV focus, TV packaging, TV hardware, or TV playback constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review GitHub pull requests with detailed, multi-perspective code analysis using parallel subagents. Use this skill whenever the user wants to review a PR, asks for code review on a pull request, mentions "review PR", "check this PR", "look at pull request", or references a PR number or GitHub PR URL. Do NOT use for local uncommitted changes — this skill only reviews pull requests on GitHub.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Leverage OpenAI Codex/GPT models for autonomous code implementation, code review, and plan review. Triggers: "codex", "use gpt", "gpt-5", "let openai", "full-auto", "adversarial review", "second opinion review", "用codex", "让gpt实现", "对抗式审查", "让codex审查计划", "第二意见". Use this skill whenever the user wants to delegate coding tasks to OpenAI models, run code or plan reviews via codex, get a second-opinion review from a different model, or execute tasks in a sandboxed environment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Chinese AI/tech writing de-AI editor for posts, X/Twitter threads, technical essays, product notes, model reviews, and public-writing drafts. Use when the user asks to 去AI味, 改得像本人, 写推特post, 精修中文AI技术文章, or complains about AI-flavored shells such as 不是A而是B, 真正/其实/本质上, 更重要的是, 冒号讲义腔, 空泛总结, 顺滑但没作者判断的稿子.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract anonymized frame-by-frame body and hand trajectories from an authorized reference video, with skeleton previews, confidence evidence, and machine-readable keypoints. Use when the user asks to 提取博主动作, 提取人体动作轨迹, 做姿态参考, 生成骨架视频, or prepare motion control data for an avatar; do not route graphic-animation replication here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews test code to identify and fix common testing anti-patterns including flaky tests, over-mocking, brittle assertions, test interdependency, and hidden test logic. Flags bad patterns, explains the specific defect, and provides corrected implementations. Use when reviewing test code, debugging intermittent or unreliable test failures, or when the user mentions flaky tests, test smells, brittle tests, test isolation issues, mock overuse, slow tests, or test maintenance problems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates PR reference XML with commit history and unified diffs between branches, with extension and path filtering. Use when creating pull request descriptions, preparing code reviews, analyzing branch changes, discovering work items from diffs, or generating structured diff summaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants to "fix everything", "sweep the codebase", "auto-fix all issues", "clean up the whole project", or asks for a single command that both diagnoses and remediates quality problems. Do NOT trigger for: read-only audits or health reports where the user only wants findings without code changes; single-dimension reviews (use the focused skill instead: brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test); server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow execution, poor readability. Triggers when: user asks about test quality, shares test files for review, or expresses frustration: "tests keep breaking whenever I change anything", "our tests take forever", "tests pass but bugs still reach production", or "we have too many mocks". Do NOT trigger for: writing new tests from scratch (use the regular test-writing workflow) or testing framework/syntax questions — this skill reviews an existing suite for structural quality problems, not individual test authoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review, approve, request changes on, or reject pending wiki edit drafts in Arkon. Requires editor or admin role. Triggers on: review drafts, pending reviews, check draft queue, approve draft, reject draft, request changes, send draft back, review wiki changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Confirm a change before merge. `/check verify` drives the real app to prove behavior against the spec (every acceptance criterion met, every surface built). `/check review` runs a senior code review on a fresh model, one that did not write the code. Verify after /develop, review before a PR. Writes to docs/reviews/, never edits code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews skill quality with evidence-based design rubrics and read-only batch inventories. Use for self-review, external skill or repository audits, and authorized auto-PR improvements. Separates design quality from measured task benefit and host compatibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transforms raw meeting transcripts into structured, evidence-based meeting minutes — merges multiple versions without losing content, reviews existing minutes against the transcript for missing items, and identifies anonymous speakers (Speaker 1/2/3, 发言人1). Triggers on 会议纪要, 会议记录, 整理纪要, 妙记转纪要, "write meeting minutes", "merge these minutes". Not for fixing ASR/STT errors first (use transcript-fixer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews PRs against the live base with immutable objects and three-way merges. Use for PR review/merge readiness, main changed, closed-PR reconsideration, open-PR sweeps, review-led repair, or explicitly requested independent review of your own contribution. Not for GitHub CRUD (use github-ops), authoring/maintaining your PR (use github-contributor), or merging without fresh review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates reusable, source-traced research reports and coordinates provider/mode lanes with original exports. Use for 深度研究, 调研报告, literature reviews, market or company research, and ChatGPT/Kimi/UniFuncs research routes. Technology choice uses tech-selection; competitor code uses competitors-analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Co-creates a personal investment-research LLM Wiki (Karpathy's pattern) by interviewing the user for THEIR OWN analysis framework, not a template — a living CLAUDE.md of pure markdown + wikilinks, no RAG in place of compilation. Use to build a compounding 投研第二大脑 / 投研知识库 / 个人投研 wiki, ingest research reports / earnings calls into an existing wiki, or run post-earnings prediction→fulfillment reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Download, export, save, or package images from a Google Gemini conversation/chat/app page, especially uploaded images or generated image previews visible in a Gemini thread. Use when the task needs logged-in Chrome/Gemini state, opening Gemini image lightboxes, downloading the larger displayed image files, renaming them in order, and producing a ZIP archive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a fast, honest competitive scan — the dimension table built from public evidence (sites, docs, pricing pages, changelogs, reviews), the claims-vs-observed discipline, and the so-what synthesis that ends in moves, not a landscape mural. Use when asked what are competitors doing, quick scan of these three rivals, how does our pricing/feature set compare, or prep the competitive slide honestly. Produces the evidence-based comparison table, the marketing-vs-reality flags, the so-what synthesis, and the staleness date.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Treat context switches as the budget line they are — the switch census (how fragmented the week really is), the batching moves that consolidate scattered same-kind work, the calendar defrag that turns Swiss cheese into slabs, and the switch-cost line for saying no. Use when asked my day is fragmented to death, count my context switches, batch my meetings and reviews, or defend against calendar Swiss cheese. Produces the fragmentation census, the batching plan, the defrag moves, and the protective phrases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Keep a running brag document of your accomplishments so reviews and promo cases write themselves. Use when asked to start or update a brag doc, log a win, track accomplishments, or prep evidence for a review/promotion. Produces a structured, dated accomplishment log — impact-first entries with metrics, scope, and the evidence link — grouped so it drops straight into a self-review or promo packet.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。