「standards」の検索結果

Implements the UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) 15 standards under the Data Protection Act 2018 Section 123. Covers best interests assessment, age-appropriate application, transparency, data minimization, geolocation restrictions, and profiling defaults. Keywords: AADC, Children's Code, ICO, age appropriate design, UK.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement the NIST Privacy Framework PROTECT function covering PR.AC access control, PR.DS data security, and PR.PO protective policies. Provides technical control implementation guidance, encryption standards, access management architectures, and security-privacy integration patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides compliance with South Korea's Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA, 개인정보 보호법). Covers pseudonymisation framework, notification requirements, PIPC enforcement, consent standards, and cross-border transfer rules under the 2023 amendments. Keywords: PIPA, Korea data protection, PIPC, pseudonymisation, consent, cross-border transfers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides managing conflicting privacy requirements across jurisdictions. Covers data localisation vs transfer freedom, consent standards variation, age thresholds, breach timelines, and resolution frameworks for incompatible obligations. Keywords: conflicting laws, data localisation, consent variation, age thresholds, resolution framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides privacy audit evidence collection processes including evidence planning, sampling strategies, documentation standards, chain of custody, interview techniques, system walkthrough procedures, and evidence evaluation. Covers ISO 19011 evidence categories (records, statements of fact, observations) and ISACA audit evidence requirements for privacy compliance assessments. Keywords: audit evidence, evidence collection, sampling, chain of custody, audit documentation, interview techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write RULES.md, the project standards the AI must follow, with registry-verified dependency versions and permanent rule IDs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modern Go Web application architecture guide. Use when creating new Go web projects, APIs, or microservices. Covers project structure, tech stack selection, and best practices based on Go standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete testing strategy covering TDD workflow, test pyramid, unit/integration/E2E/property testing, framework best practices (Jest, Vitest, pytest), mock strategies, and CI integration. Use when writing tests, reviewing test quality, or establishing testing standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform legacy codebases into AI-ready projects with Claude Code configurations. Use when (1) analyzing old projects to generate AI coding configurations, (2) creating CLAUDE.md, skills, subagents, slash commands, hooks, or rules for existing projects, (3) user wants to enable vibe coding for a codebase, (4) onboarding new team members with AI-assisted development, (5) user mentions "make project AI-ready", "generate Claude config", or "create coding standards for AI".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, extract, or convert an ADR (architectural decision record) using the ADR template. Use when creating new ADRs, extracting an ADR from existing documentation, converting a document into an ADR, recording an architecture or design decision, or updating the status of an existing ADR. Does not create or update enforceable coding standards or conventions — use coding-standard for that. Does not write feature or system documentation — use project-documentation instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates or updates project documentation for a feature, system, or component and publishes it to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants feature or system documentation written to Confluence, posted to a Confluence space or page, or synced to a Confluence location. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not document to local files only — use project-documentation for that. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence for that. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence for that. Does not create architectural decision records — use architectural-decision-record. Does not create coding standards — use coding-standard. Does not produce runbooks — use runbook.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates and maintains project documentation for features, systems, and components. Use when documenting how a feature, system, or component works — including writing, updating, or organizing docs. Does not scan or detect the project's technology stack — use project-discovery for repository analysis and config detection. Does not create architectural decision records — use architectural-decision-record for ADRs. Does not create or update coding standards — use coding-standard instead. Does not generate PR descriptions — use update-pr-description for that. Does not produce runbooks for operational scenarios — use runbook for that. Does not rewrite existing prose for readability — use edit-for-readability for that. Does not produce an ephemeral, understand-now overview of code or a PR — use code-overview for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update a runbook for an operational scenario — an incident an alert fires for, a recurring scheduled task, or a known failure mode on a live service — using a consistent template. Use when writing, drafting, authoring, or updating a runbook for an alert, incident, on-call procedure, scheduled maintenance, or operational SOP. Applies a YAGNI preflight requiring the scenario to be real before producing the runbook. Does not produce feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not record architectural decisions — use architectural-decision-record. Does not create coding standards — use coding-standard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct comprehensive code reviews identifying bugs, security issues, performance problems, code quality concerns, and best practice violations. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, evaluating new code, assessing code quality, or providing feedback on implementations. Analyzes code for correctness, security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, maintainability issues, test coverage, documentation quality, and adherence to coding standards. Produces structured markdown reviews with categorized findings, severity ratings, specific examples, and actionable recommendations. Triggers when users ask to review code, check pull requests, evaluate implementations, find bugs, or assess code quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when completing LBO (Leveraged Buyout) model templates in Excel for private equity transactions, deal materials, or investment committee presentations. The skill fills in formulas, validates calculations, and ensures professional formatting standards that adapt to any template structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review WooCommerce code changes for coding standards compliance. Use when reviewing code locally, performing automated PR reviews, or checking code quality in WooCommerce projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mobile app testing with unit tests, UI automation, performance testing. Use for test infrastructure, E2E tests, testing standards, or encountering test framework setup, device farms, flaky tests, platform-specific test errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

| Creates comprehensive design systems with typography, colors, components, and documentation for consistent UI development. Use when establishing design standards, building component libraries, or ensuring cross-team consistency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master REST and GraphQL API design principles to build intuitive, scalable, and maintainable APIs that delight developers. Use when designing new APIs, reviewing API specifications, or establishing API design standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply a disciplined engineering workflow to any code change. Use whenever implementing a feature, fixing a bug, or refactoring — before writing code, not after. Walks orient → baseline → smallest change → test → verify → self-review, and enforces language-agnostic hard gates (don't mass-reformat, keep the linter and type-checker clean, keep the build and tests green, make interface changes additive, protect security invariants).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit web interfaces against WCAG 2.1 AA/AAA standards, identify violations, and produce actionable remediation reports with code fixes. Use when the user requests accessibility testing or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Electronics Engineer. Use when a task calls for Electronics Engineer judgment. Reasons from datasheet-corner device physics, signal-chain error budgets, and analog-digital return-path coupling through LTspice/IBIS-AMI simulation, ICT/boundary-scan coverage, golden-board signature comparison, and IPC/AEC-Q standards while treating ESD versus EOS overstress, MLCC DC-bias derating, reference and clock-jitter ENOB loss, and NFF field returns as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Epidemiologist. Use when a task calls for Epidemiologist judgment. Reasons from person-time, transmission dynamics, and population case definitions through epidemic curves, DAGs, renewal and SEIR models (EpiEstim, deSolve), SaTScan clustering, and STROBE/ORION/GRADE standards while treating confounding, collider stratification from test-positive conditioning, reporting-delay and testing-intensity artifacts, and superspreading overdispersion as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。