「cap」の検索結果

Web search, content extraction, crawling, and deep research via the Tavily CLI. Use this skill whenever the user wants to search the web, find articles, research a topic, look something up online, extract content from a URL, grab text from a webpage, crawl documentation, download a site's pages, discover URLs on a domain, or conduct in-depth research with citations. Also use when they say "fetch this page", "pull the content from", "get the page at https://", "find me articles about", or reference extracting data from external websites. This provides LLM-optimized web search, content extraction, site crawling, URL discovery, and AI-powered deep research — capabilities beyond what agents can do natively. Do NOT trigger for local file operations, git commands, deployments, or code editing tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Web search with full page content extraction. Use this skill whenever the user asks to search the web, find articles, research a topic, look something up, find recent news, discover sources, or says "search for", "find me", "look up", "what are people saying about", or "find articles about". Returns real search results with optional full-page markdown — not just snippets. Provides capabilities beyond Claude's built-in WebSearch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Web scraping, search, crawling, and page interaction via the Firecrawl CLI. Use this skill whenever the user wants to search the web, find articles, research a topic, look something up online, scrape a webpage, grab content from a URL, extract data from a website, crawl documentation, download a site, or interact with pages that need clicks or logins. Also use when they say "fetch this page", "pull the content from", "get the page at https://", or reference scraping external websites. This provides real-time web search with full page content extraction and interact capabilities — beyond what Claude can do natively with built-in tools. Do NOT trigger for local file operations, git commands, deployments, or code editing tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Claude Code features and capabilities to uncover advanced usage patterns, best practices, and real-world application scenarios. Use this skill whenever the user mentions a Claude Code feature (like Streaming Tool Execution, Hooks, MCP, Skills, Subagents, Context Management, Permission Modes, etc.) and wants to know how to leverage it effectively — including advanced tips, workflow optimizations, creative use cases, and pitfalls to avoid. Also trigger when the user pastes a feature description or asks 'how to use X better in Claude Code', even without explicitly saying 'analyze'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep bug analysis to break the fix-forget-repeat cycle. Analyzes root cause category, why fixes failed, prevention mechanisms, and captures knowledge into specs. Use after fixing a bug to prevent the same class of bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Requires OFOX_API_KEY — create one at https://app.ofox.ai, plus the music file the finished video must carry. Your audio never reaches the API (measured) — the visuals are written to the track's tempo, mood and sections, then your own file is laid on locally at zero cost. One job caps at 30 seconds, so a three-minute song is six jobs minimum and the cost table says that before anything is spent. Use when a user has a specific piece of music and wants visuals for it, e.g. "make a music video for this track", "visuals for my song", "an MV for this instrumental", "generate footage cut to this beat". Do not use for cheap vertical social drafts (shorts-reels), a brand film that happens to have a music bed (seedance-ad-creative), or when there is no particular audio file the finished video has to carry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Requires OFOX_API_KEY — create one at https://app.ofox.ai, plus two real screenshots of one interface in two states. Animates the transition between them as one video — both go into a single Ofox video job, and the model cross-fades the values that changed while the rest of the layout holds. Use when a user wants a short software demo animation out of captures they already have, e.g. "turn these two screenshots into a demo clip", "show the dashboard going from the free plan to the paid one", "animate this settings change for the docs", or "make a clip of the counter going from 3 to 25". Do not use for a pair that is not a user interface (see keyframe-animation), for a screen recording (record it instead), or when only one screenshot exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Captures executable contracts and coding conventions into .trellis/spec/ documents. Use when learning something valuable from debugging, implementing, or discussion that should be preserved for future sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly competitive landscape monitoring and analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates the full multi-channel outreach cadence for all active leads. Tracks where each lead is, generates appropriate content, manages daily caps, handles weekends, and coordinates across email, LinkedIn, Instagram, and phone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates current go-to-market positioning versus the market. Analyzes website, content, pricing, ICP alignment, and competitive landscape to identify gaps, opportunities, and produce a GTM health report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and diagnose FIPA-style ontology-service interactions while keeping declared ontology relations, provider capability, and application authorization separate. NOT for treating an ontology mapping as provider authority or guaranteed interoperability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architects the encryption, codec/transport, and premium-feature layer of a group video-calling product, on top of an already-chosen SFU topology. Covers E2EE patterns (Zoom leader-fan-out, Signal pairwise-fan-out, MLS/TreeKEM as in Discord's DAVE, Telegram's ledger consensus), the SFrame (RFC 9605) + WebRTC Insertable Streams mechanism letting an SFU relay encrypted frames it can't read, codec/transport choice (AV1/VP9 SVC vs. simulcast, Opus, congestion control, Media-over-QUIC, WHIP/WHEP), and which "premium" features (virtual backgrounds, live captions, recording, breakout rooms, spatial audio) survive E2EE vs. structurally can't. Use when adding E2EE to an SFU-based call, choosing a 2026 codec/SVC strategy, or deciding which features to disable under E2EE mode. NOT for call topology/platform choice (see webrtc-adhoc-video-chat, which this composes with). NOT for one-way broadcast (see managed-video-streaming-pipeline). NOT for the DM/group-chat text backend (see realtime-messaging-backend-architecture).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit or design server-side indexes, directories, reputations, or aggregates that are DERIVED from traffic a platform witnesses (chain heads, run verdicts, heartbeats, publish activity) so that consent gates the derivation, not merely the read: no shadow index over non-consenting principals, post-consent-only evidence windows, retention bounds and delete-propagation into derived rows, activity-oracle threat modeling, and audit-logged ranking discretion. Use when building a capability directory / whois from witnessed activity, a reputation ledger from settled outcomes, vitals aggregation across tenants, or any "the yellow pages can't lie because they index signatures" feature. Keywords: shadow index, derived index, consent gates derivation, activity oracle, phone book not a log, delist propagation, ranking weight audit, k-anonymous aggregate, subpoena surface. NOT for the consent-screen UX and scope-ladder mechanics themselves (use local-first-tenancy-boundary), reputation scoring math and Sybil economics (use agent-identity-continuity-reputation), or discovery-layer architecture L1/L2/L3 (use agent-discovery-directories-guilds).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce feasible non-preemptive DAG schedules from declared predecessors, durations, gates, capacities, and calendars. NOT for authorizing task execution or hiding resource and calendar infeasibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Threat-models protocols where authority, scarce resources, bonds, bounties, escrow, reputation, ordering, adjudication, or settlement create strategic incentives. Use to test attack utility, conservation, collusion, Sybil resistance, oracle capture, griefing, custody, liquidity, and residual risk. NOT for choosing payment or bond amounts without evidence, smart-contract code audit, legal or employment classification, DeFi trading, admitting workers, or settling claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates typed DAG dependency declarations, returns Kahn linear extensions or generations and residual cycle witnesses, and identifies changed consumers for revalidation. NOT for constructing graphs, scheduling resource capacity, granting effects, or executing nodes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic analyst that maps competitive landscapes, identifies white space opportunities, and provides positioning recommendations. Use when users need competitive analysis, market positioning strategy, differentiation tactics, or "how do I stand out?" guidance across any domain (portfolios, products, services). NOT for market size estimation or financial forecasting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply Conway's homomorphism principle to multi-agent system design, recognizing that agent coordination structure predetermines system architecture and capability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether an enforced-coordination MCP has actually shrunk its ~19 legacy etiquette verbs into the 5 enforced tools — work/act/ask/recall/status — each carrying one denial shape and one transcript event, migrated through a real retirement path (intake-metadata, alias, or doc-history — never a parallel runtime), with zero legacy-verb calls once a body reaches compliance mode C4+. Use when reviewing a broker-collapse migration plan, gating a body's move from advisory (C0-C3) to enforced (C4+) coordination, or verifying IT-018 Broker Collapse compliance. NOT for the inbound trigger→spawn boundary that decides whether an event may spawn an agent at all (use fleet-event-spawn-trust), the capability-token cryptographic mechanism behind a denial (use agentic-zero-trust-security), designing how a swarm of agents invokes and shards work (use swarm-invocation-designer), or auditing an individual PR's mergeability (use agent-pr-authoring).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct Critical Decision Method (CDM) interviews to elicit expert reasoning strategies (L3 knowledge) from practitioners about specific challenging past incidents. Use when capturing expertise for skill development, preserving knowledge before practitioner departure, building post-incident learning artifacts, or investigating decisions in complex sociotechnical systems. Outputs structured incident reconstructions with cues, decisions, alternatives considered, and counterfactual analysis suitable for distillation into skills or training material.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic methodology for eliciting, representing, and operationalizing expert cognitive skills—pattern recognition, situation assessment, mental simulation—from practitioners without requiring research training. Bridges academic rigor and practical usability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits an Articles of Agreement contract — the daemon-witnessed agreement every official Port Daddy agent signs covering registration, transcript reporting, tool-use gating, file claims, parley conduct, budget limits, and operator control — against the enforcement-beats-hope bar: a clause counts as safe only when it resolves to a concrete, daemon-observable mechanism with a defined denial shape, never a promise the agent might honor. Use when drafting a new agent's Articles, reviewing a compliance-level (C0-C6) claim, deciding whether a clause is genuinely enforced or merely documented, or auditing whether an agent's claimed identity can be trusted. NOT for securing the inbound event-to-spawn path (fleet-event-spawn-trust), designing the relay's transport PKI and signing keys (pd-relay-zero-trust), or tracking an agent's identity and reputation across its whole lifetime after it signs (agent-identity-continuity-reputation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。