「audit」の検索結果

Voert de iteratieve desk-review-&-completion-cyclus uit op een regelrecht-corpus — plannen, harvesten/migreren/uitbreiden, multi-agent valideren, bevindingen 4-weg classificeren (modellering-fout / wetgevings-fout / engine-limitatie / acceptabele untranslatable), synthese + heroverweging, documenteren (wetgevings-/stelselfouten-analyse, fixes-plan, engine-limitaties, diagrammen, corpus-status), verifiëren tegen externe bronnen (resolutie-tracker + bronnen-dossier), en een eindrapport per cyclus. Gebruik dit bij corpus-review op correctheid/coverage zonder live expert-sessie, het opstellen van een wetgevings-notitie-bron, schema-migratie, het harvesten van nieuwe wetten, of het aansturen van een autonome completion-loop. Dossier-agnostisch; de regelrecht-methode is de vaste taal. Voor live-validatie met experts: zie regelrecht-audit-products.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maakt regelrecht-scenario's vindbaar en hun norm-ketens leesbaar/geassert. Aan de invoerkant — vertaal een platte lijst leaf-parameters naar benoemde casus-assen + een herbruikbare persona-bibliotheek, met een reverse-lookup casus-matrix. Aan de uitvoerkant — maak de norm-keten zichtbaar via keten-checkpoints (assert elke knoop op het kritieke pad, niet alleen de endpoint) en golden-trace-snapshots + branch-coverage. Gebruik dit bij het schrijven of opschonen van scenario-/feature-files, het terugvinden of ontwerpen van een specifieke casus in een grote variabelenlijst, het reviewen van engine-traces, of het regressie-bestendig maken van cross-law-ketens zodat een ketenfout niet stil achter een correcte endpoint verdwijnt. Dossier-agnostisch; de regelrecht-methode is de vaste taal. Haakt aan op regelrecht-stelselanalyse (engine-tests / meta-check) en regelrecht-audit-products (testcase-scenario's).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Anti-slop frontend skill for landing pages, portfolios, and redesigns. The agent reads the brief, infers the right design direction, and ships interfaces that do not look templated. Real design systems when applicable, audit-first on redesigns, strict pre-flight check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when independently reviewing a research-paper draft before submission, running a mock top-conference panel, assessing readiness or accept/reject risk, or predicting reviewer concerns for venues such as CVPR, ICCV, ECCV, ICLR, NeurIPS, and AAAI. Does not draft or audit author responses after official reviews arrive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when research writing, reviews, rebuttals, or related-work planning needs academic evidence. Searches literature, screens candidate papers, audits novelty and missing work, verifies DOI/BibTeX/reference metadata and citation authenticity, and checks whether sources support the stated claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft or restructure research-paper sections, refine local prose, and audit manuscript-wide consistency. Use for evidence-grounded academic writing and revision, not independent acceptance-risk review or official rebuttal management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a lightweight pre-release readiness review of Atlassian Forge apps across manifest/module wiring, architecture, runtime compatibility, dependency posture, tests, deploy readiness, and obvious security, cost, or reliability smells. Use when the user asks "review my Forge app", "pre-deploy check", "is this app ready to ship", "review manifest", "general app review", "release readiness", or asks for a broad quality pass. Do not use for deep security audits/SAST/exploitability review, cost optimization, or diagnosing a known broken app; route those to forge-security-review, forge-cost-optimizer, or forge-debugger respectively.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a white-box security review of Atlassian Forge apps using structured, Forge-specific security rules and evidence-driven reporting. Use when the user asks for a Forge security review, security audit, vuln assessment, pentest-style code review, authz review, tenant isolation analysis, web trigger hardening, or static analysis execution for a Forge app.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Universal prose writing and audit skill. Apply for writing, editing, or reviewing prose, and for explicit requests to score text or flag formulaic AI-writing patterns. Do not activate for ordinary factual, code, or configuration tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare policies, procedures, onboarding files, or operating evidence against a named compliance framework such as AML/KYC, privacy, internal controls, or audit readiness. Use when a team needs a gap matrix, control checklist, remediation priorities, or evidence request list. Do not use when no target framework is specified or when formal legal or regulatory sign-off is required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read and interpret financial statements — Income Statement, Balance Sheet, and Cash Flow Statement. Calculate key ratios, identify trends, and produce an analysis narrative. Use when reviewing company performance, preparing for investor meetings, or conducting due diligence. Do not use for preparing or auditing financial statements — this is an analysis tool only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn raw budget-versus-actual data into plain-language explanations for non-finance managers. Focus on why numbers moved, what it means for the team, and what action to take — without requiring accounting knowledge. Use when managers need to understand their cost center performance. Do not use for technical accounting analysis, tax preparation, or external audit deliverables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build structured 3-scenario financial models (Base / Bull / Bear) for business planning or investment decisions. Sensitize revenue and cost drivers across scenarios, produce P&L summaries, cash flow bridges, and executive narratives. Aligns with FP&A 2.0 and CIMA Management Accounting standards. Use when leadership needs to understand the financial impact range of a decision. Do not use for statutory financial reporting or audit-ready financials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record and track organizational decisions using the RAPID framework. Captures decision context, options analysis, RAPID roles, risk assessment, and communication plan. Use when making cross-functional decisions, documenting governance choices, or building an auditable decision trail.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review REST and GraphQL API designs for consistency, usability, and best practices. Covers naming conventions, versioning strategy, error format, pagination, authentication patterns, and breaking change detection. Use when reviewing API specs, designing new APIs, or auditing existing endpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Digital forensics and incident response triage skill for disk, memory, network, cloud, and endpoint artifacts. Covers Volatility 3, Velociraptor, KAPE, Plaso, Autopsy, Chainsaw, Hayabusa, Zeek, Arkime, EVTX, AWS/Azure/GCP audit logs, and timeline reconstruction. Use to extract IOCs, build incident timelines, and produce defensible analyst reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review computational protein or gene function predictions and fill PredictionReview YAML files using the COR/CNN/LSP/UNC/PLI/NPI/REP biological-validity taxonomy. Use for ProtNLM, DeepECTF, BioReason/GO-GPT, InterPro2GO, PANTHER/IBA, CLEAN, GloEC, MAPred, ProteinInfer, or other predicted EC/GO annotations, including audits of the evidence and reasoning in existing prediction reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review pull requests, branch diffs, and uncommitted changes in this Flutter repository with a bug-finding mindset. Use when asked to review changes, review a PR, audit a diff, check standards, check compliance, or look for regressions, missing tests, release risks, or architecture mismatches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a roll-forward schedule for a balance-sheet account or account group, tying beginning balance, activity, reversals, payments, adjustments, and ending balance to GL support. Use for month-end close packages and audit support.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Curate evidence-backed collateralQuality and whole-book custodyModel labels. Use when adding a stablecoin or auditing Selector custody eligibility and DDR depeg-duration verdicts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify CoinGecko identity, discover missing stablecoin chain coverage, or populate independently verified deployments only when requested. Use for `geckoId` audits and `contracts[]` work in the Pharos stablecoin registry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research and populate tracked stablecoin compliance sidecars for the U.S. GENIUS Act, EU MiCA, or both. Use when adding or auditing authorization, applicability, pathway, or disclosure evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Smart contract vulnerability playbook. Use when auditing Solidity/EVM contracts for reentrancy, integer overflow, access control, delegatecall, flash loan, signature replay, and MEV-related attack patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-exploitation workflow. Covers privilege escalation (Linux SUID/sudo/kernel, Windows UAC/service/token), persistence assessment, local enumeration, credential harvesting, and pivot preparation. Structured workflows for Linux and Windows targets using impacket, netexec, john, linpeas/winpeas, and standard Kali tools. Includes kernel exploit reference tables, GTFOBins exploitation chains, Potato attack selection, Docker/container escapes, DLL hijacking, SSH key harvesting, credential recovery from memory, and Windows token manipulation. Chains from /pentester or /credential-audit when access is obtained.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。