「codex review」の検索結果

Cross-agent self-inspection of your AI-agent stack. Audits skills, MCP servers, hooks, plugins, commands, credentials, and memory files across Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, and NanoClaw. Produces a structured inventory and narrative briefing with cross-ecosystem risk analysis. Use when the user asks to audit their own setup, check what they have installed, review their agent stack security posture, or understand cross-tool interactions. Use when a user has accumulated skills/plugins/MCP servers over time and wants visibility into their attack surface. Use after installing new skills or plugins. Do NOT use for vetting external code before install (that is repo-forensics). Do NOT use for incident response during active attacks. Do NOT use for fixing or patching vulnerabilities (forensify is read-only).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a structured implementation plan from an evidence draft. Validate paths, obtain configured independent Codex and Qoder reviews, synthesize available advice against repository evidence, preserve the draft, and produce testable acceptance criteria and validation steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize the single strongest EVIDENCE-BOUND reviewer case to reject a paper, built ONLY from the evidence ledger (claims.json) + the other auditors' confirmed findings — never free-floating LLM critique. Two fresh cross-model codex threads: an attack writes the ~200-word rejection paragraph (every accusation tagged to an existing claim_id/finding_id), a defense decomposes it and rules each point against the anchored evidence. MEMO-ONLY: emits adversarial-case-builder.memo.md (fed to the adjudicator via --memo) and carries NO verdict weight — tools/adjudicate_findings.py lists it in ZERO_WEIGHT_SKILLS and caps it at info. Honest-null allowed (the paper may survive). Run LAST. Detect-only. Adapted from ARIS kill-argument. Triggers: "adversarial case", "strongest objection", "rejection memo", "kill argument", "最强拒稿点".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define or review SLOs and SLAs for a service. Use when a senior developer needs reliability targets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review data handling for privacy and retention. Use when a senior developer needs governance validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when installing, bootstrapping, configuring, starting, verifying, operating, or troubleshooting Looper, looperd, the looper CLI, ~/.looper config, or runtime paths; when setting up Looper with opencode, claude-code, codex, cursor-cli, Grok Build, Pi, or Oh My Pi (omp); when registering repos or configuring planner/reviewer/fixer/worker loops; or when diagnosing status, logs, osascript, git, gh, LOOPER_TOKEN, writable path, or daemon startup issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review whole motion-system release resilience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review trust before frontend tooling adoption.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove redundant or unsupported page content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repair interchangeable website design patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede Labs copy-only orchestration DAG. Use for one high-stakes piece strangers will read that has to be true: a landing page, launch post, blog post, email, X thread, docs page, README, ad, or store listing, researched, fact-audited, adversarially reviewed, and gated for publish readiness in one pass. The audit targets what the agents invent, never what the requester supplied: their own statements are given, and no phase may verify, hedge, or gate on them. Reads the live surface; never publishes. NOT FOR: multi-surface campaign writing (use johnny-suede-write); changing code (use suede-graph-flo-xr); one surface in one pass with no research (use suede-copy); stripping AI patterns from existing text (use suede-deslop); bulk generation of many independent pieces (private Suede Labs companion, not in this pack: suede-codex-fleet).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when acting as a project manager that delegates tasks to other coding-agent sessions (Claude Code, Codex, or Pi) - launch workers, assign them work, monitor progress, review their tool calls, and collect results

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launches a saved multi-agent workflow by id on Claude Code or Codex. Use when the user asks to run a saved workflow or review loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chooses subagent, team, workflow, or debate and launches it on Claude Code or Codex. Use when delegating, running agent review boards, or installing shared agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auditing AI CLI configs and designing, configuring, or debugging Claude Code hooks. Use for Codex/agy/Claude Code config reviews, hook lifecycle automation, quality gates, or MCP governance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when a user needs to inspect, score, repair, or regression-test academic paper formatting in DOCX files, especially thesis, journal, or conference documents with a separate format specification. The skill guides Codex through local-first document handling, rule extraction, formatting repair, report review, and contribution-safe validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Continue a task in xAI Grok Build using the shared Director handoff packet. Use when the user says to use Grok, requests a Grok review, or wants Grok Build to take over work started in Claude Code or Codex CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suggest whether Claude Code, Codex CLI, or Grok Build is a useful next collaborator, without launching a CLI or changing controls. Use when comparing the three CLIs, planning a handoff, or deciding whether an independent implementation or review would help.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits GitHub Actions workflows for security vulnerabilities in AI agent integrations including Claude Code Action, Gemini CLI, OpenAI Codex, and GitHub AI Inference. Detects attack vectors where attacker-controlled input reaches AI agents running in CI/CD pipelines, including env var intermediary patterns, direct expression injection, dangerous sandbox configurations, and wildcard user allowlists. Use when reviewing workflow files that invoke AI coding agents, auditing CI/CD pipeline security for prompt injection risks, or evaluating agentic action configurations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-platform hooks reference for AI coding assistants — Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and Amp. Covers hook authoring in Node.js (ESM and CJS) and Python, per-platform event schemas, inline-agent hooks and MCP in agent frontmatter, common JSON I/O, exit codes, best practices, and a fetch script to refresh docs from official sources. Use when writing, reviewing, or debugging hooks for any AI assistant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and push reusable skills to SkillNote from Codex when repeated instructions are detected or the user says "create a skill", "save this pattern", "push a skill". Guides drafting, review, collection selection, and publishing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-verify Claude-generated plans and code using OpenAI Codex and Google Gemini CLI. Provides code review, plan validation, and comparative analysis. Use when needing second opinions on Claude's code or plans, validating technical decisions, or seeking consensus from multiple AI models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track validated Codex Security findings in Linear, Jira, GitHub issues, or draft GitHub security advisories. Use it for one finding or an explicitly selected batch of up to 25 findings tracked as Linear, Jira, or GitHub issues. Includes duplicate checks, exact previews, approval-gated writes, and readback. Do not use it for scans or fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for coding, PR delivery, scaffolding and QA. Triggers: develop, fix, refactor, test, review, docs, browse, stacked PR, 개발, 수정, 검토, 스택 PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。