「erd」の検索結果

Dung khi leader phai DUYET output CHU cua team truoc khi trien khai — content brief co dung insight va dung pillar khong, CTA co ro khong; ads copy va creative co proof cho claim khong, dung tone khong, hook co nam trong 125 ky tu dau khong; verdict Approve / Revise / Redo kem feedback cu the. Kich hoat khi user nhac 'duyet brief', 'review ads copy', 'duyet content', 'check truoc khi chay', 'bai nay dang duoc chua', 'em viet the nay sep xem giup', 'duyet output team'. Khong dung cho — cham diem THIET KE va hinh anh thi dung skill 47-design-review; danh gia nang luc nguoi lam thi dung skill 65-team-performance-review; can nhieu goc nhin phan bien cho mot huong chien luoc thi dung skill 72-hoi-dong-marketing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a leader must review or approve TEXT-based team output before it ships — content briefs checked for angle, pillar, and CTA, ad copy and creative checked for substantiated claims, on-brand tone, a hook inside the first 125 characters, and platform policy, ending in an Approve, Revise, or Redo verdict with point-by-point feedback. Trigger on 'review this brief', 'approve the ad copy', 'check ads before launch', 'review team output', 'is this good enough to publish', 'my team keeps sending me drafts'. Not for — reviewing a visual design, see `47-design-review-global`; evaluating a person over a period, see `65-team-performance-review-global`; writing the copy yourself, see `05-ad-copy-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a campaign has ENDED and the team needs a structured retrospective — a scorecard against target, what worked, what did not, and why with evidence, surprises, process review, lessons written back into the playbook and Brand Hub, and action items with owners. Trigger on 'campaign retrospective', 'campaign retro', 'post-mortem', 'campaign debrief', 'what worked and what did not', 'the campaign is over, what did we learn'. Also use when a campaign underdelivered and the team is arguing about why. Not for — a periodic performance report, see `07-marketing-report-global`; diagnosing live numbers mid-flight, see `03-performance-eval-global`; the next period ads plan, see `57-next-ads-plan-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a finished DESIGN needs scoring and feedback — brand consistency, hierarchy plus readability plus accessibility, conversion elements, and platform fit, 10 points each, with per-issue feedback in issue, why, and how-to-fix form and a verdict of approve, minor fix, or redo. Trigger on 'design review', 'review this design', 'score this creative', 'is this design good', 'brand check on this banner', 'can we ship this or not'. Also use when the user just sends an image and asks for thoughts. Not for — reviewing copy and briefs, see `62-marketing-review-global`; writing the brief before production, see `42-image-brief-global`; the brand rules being checked against, see `46-brand-guideline-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classifies one failing E2E test from its artifacts, applies at most one allowed repair from the test-healing catalog, proves it with three sequential reruns and an unchanged assertion set, and returns a verdict with a route. Use per failure inside test-loop; never for production code changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draws one evidence-grounded architecture diagram as an editable draw.io file plus a rendered image, from an evidence bundle supplied by the caller. Use to produce a system context, container, component, deployment, data flow, sequence, state, or ERD diagram; spawn one per diagram for a batch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measures whether an automation suite builds release confidence via feedback-loop length, suite reliability, release cadence, and production escape rate, and emits a release_confidence verdict. Use when judging suite value, ROI, or pre-release trust; not for writing or healing tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draws architecture diagrams as editable draw.io files with a fixed house style, C4 levels, evidence-tagged shapes, and optional multi-view identity checks. Use when producing a system context, container, component, deployment, data flow, sequence, state, or ERD, or redrawing an ASCII or Mermaid one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review changed Elixir/Phoenix code read-only. Check requirements, cite evidence, deduplicate, and return a verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review changed Elixir/Phoenix code read-only. Check requirements, cite evidence, deduplicate findings, and return a severity-based verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an A/B codex review experiment — holistic codex review vs 3 focused dimension passes (security, ecto, liveview) on the branch diff, classify findings, report a panel-value verdict. Use when the branch is fresh, before any codex review runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically verifies suspected security bugs to eliminate false positives. Produces TRUE POSITIVE or FALSE POSITIVE verdicts with documented evidence for each bug.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent arasi iletisim sablonlari. Standard handoff, QA verdict (PASS/FAIL), escalation, bug report, security finding ve status update formatlari.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement production-ready service mesh deployments with Istio, Linkerd, or Cilium. Configure mTLS, authorization policies, traffic routing, and progressive delivery patterns for secure, observable microservices. Use when setting up service-to-service communication, implementing zero-trust security, or enabling canary deployments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Final arbiter for Bug Hunter. Receives Hunter findings and Skeptic challenges, independently re-reads code, and delivers authoritative verdicts with CVSS scoring and proof-of-concept generation for security findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses and fixes skills in the dotnet/skills repository that lose to their own baseline, fail to activate, time out, or return "no credible improvement". Use when an evaluation verdict is a regression or underpowered, when a skill regressed after a change, when /evaluate reports no results, or when deciding whether a weak skill should be strengthened or retired. Do not use for scaffolding a brand-new skill (use create-skill) or a brand-new eval (use create-skill-test).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Own MSBuild import and hook discovery. USE FOR: CustomBefore/CustomAfter hooks, ordered wildcard and NuGet auto-imports, control properties, build/buildTransitive packed layout, package ID and file-name matching, per-TFM forwarders, and tracing why assets or hooks are missing, broken, or replaced. An import guard remains in scope when it is one defect in a broader hook/import flow. DO NOT USE for a focused safety verdict on whether one specific Import needs Exists or is an intentionally unguarded package contract; use msbuild-antipatterns. NEVER INVOKE when imports and hook placement already work and the request is only target Inputs/Outputs, incremental skipping, or FileWrites clean tracking; use incremental-build or target-authoring. Exclude props-versus-targets placement and non-MSBuild systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DO NOT INVOKE when the primary request explicitly asks to convert, migrate, modernize, or rewrite a legacy/old-style project to SDK style; use msbuild-modernization. Migration prompts often mention ToolsVersion, explicit Compile/Reference entries, packages.config, or Microsoft.CSharp.targets, but merely reviewing or auditing a file that contains those patterns remains in scope here. USE FOR broad review, audit, lint, or maintainability/correctness checks of project/build files, including custom targets; prioritized cross-cutting findings; discrete anti-patterns; F# ordering/FS0039; cross-platform paths; and focused Import safety verdicts. Review/audit is analysis-only unless fixes are requested. For concrete property/item defects use property-patterns/item-management; use target-authoring for implementation and extension-points for NuGet auto-import/layout discovery. Exclude non-MSBuild systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert .NET tests from xUnit.net v2/v3 to MSTest v4 while preserving VSTest or MTP. Use for replacing xunit packages, Fact/Theory/InlineData/MemberData, assertions, IClassFixture/ICollectionFixture, ITestOutputHelper, TestContext cancellation, traits/Owner, skips, timeouts, and xUnit parallelization. Also use when a "convert xUnit to MSTest" request may already be migrated: inspect and report the no-op. Do not use for xUnit v2-to-v3, MSTest upgrades, NUnit/TUnit conversion, or runner-only VSTest-to-MTP migration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summon shadow clones: genjutsu's full-scale pipeline for a whole website or web app, from scratch or as a full redesign. Harvests the client's real material, researches in parallel, lets Impeccable lead the direction and genjutsu the motion, builds the pages with parallel agents, then loops fixes, verdicts and a cold-eyes art director until only minor issues remain, the round cap of the chosen tier is reached, or a round fixes nothing. Announces its cost first and asks twice. Web. Needs a host that can spawn subagents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Running a team of subagents on one design build: clone briefs, disjoint file ownership, isolated builds, the evidence packet, review lenses, the fix plan, verdicts, cold eyes and the stop rule, with the workflow templates bunshin runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

用于火山引擎（Volcengine）数据库（MySQL、veDB-MySQL、PostgreSQL、SQL Server、MongoDB、Redis）和公网自建数据库（MySQL和PostgreSQL系列）的元数据管理、数据分析、开发变更、运维诊断、巡检。覆盖实例列表查询、实例下数据库列表查询、表列表查询、表结构查询、数据查询、数据分析与可视化报告（含跨数据源/文件联合分析）、数据治理（资产盘点/数据画像/数据质量/敏感数据识别）、慢查询诊断、死锁与锁等待分析、事务与活跃会话排查、错误日志查询、表空间分析、健康巡检、监控指标查询、变更工单申请等场景。不支持字节云（ByteCloud）数据库，如 ByteRDS / ByteDoc / ByteRedis。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workaround for Claude Code filtering BMP PUA Unicode (U+E000-U+F8FF). Supplementary PUA Nerd Font icons like 󰊤 󱃾 󰁹 (U+F0000+, e.g. nf-md-github, nf-md-kubernetes, nf-md-battery) can be written directly. BMP PUA icons (Powerline, Font Awesome, Devicons) require placeholder syntax like {{ U+E0A0 }} or {{ nf-fa-star }} (without spaces), which hooks auto-convert. Invoke when reading or writing Starship configs, tmux themes, shell prompts, or statuslines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Freshly judge exact subject content against bead or caller acceptance, optionally persist verdict.v2 for a declared consumer, and stop. Triggers: "validate", "independently validate", "vibe".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。