「credibility」の検索結果

Plan how to earn customer trust and appropriate access. Use when credibility, permissions or AI policy constrain the engagement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build brand partnership strategy — co-branding campaigns, brand collaborations, licensing deals, partner brand alignment, and joint marketing. Use when the user says "brand partnership", "brand collab", "co-branding", "brand collaboration", "partnership marketing", "brand alliance", "co-branded product", "licensing deal", "partner with another brand", "brand collaboration strategy", "how do we partner with brands", "co-marketing partnership", "joint campaign", or wants to build credibility, reach, or revenue through alignment with another brand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a personal brand strategy for founders, executives, creators, and consultants. Use when the user says "personal brand", "personal branding", "build my brand", "founder brand", "executive brand", "thought leadership", "I want to be known for", "grow my personal brand", "LinkedIn presence", "creator brand", "consultant brand", "personal brand strategy", "position myself", "what should I be known for", or wants to establish credibility, grow an audience, or become a recognized voice in their industry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and execute brand marketing strategy for B2B companies — thought leadership, ABM brand layer, trust signals, LinkedIn presence, long sales cycle brand touchpoints, and enterprise credibility. Use when the user says "B2B marketing", "B2B brand", "business to business marketing", "selling to companies", "enterprise marketing", "we sell to businesses", "B2B brand strategy", "thought leadership strategy", "B2B content marketing", "account-based marketing brand", "B2B positioning", "how do we build trust with buyers", or is marketing a product or service sold to other businesses rather than consumers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user asks to "humanize", "make this sound more human", "rewrite to avoid AI detection", "make this less AI-sounding", "add a human voice", or "write like a person". Also use when the user pastes text and asks why it reads as robotic, generic, flat, or AI-like, or when generating new text in a register where AI tells (em dashes, semicolons, hedges, banned vocabulary like "delve", "leverage", "robust") would damage credibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn client wins into formatted case studies for proposals, social proof, and sales conversations. Use when someone needs to document results, build credibility, or create reusable proof assets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews pitch decks and investor presentations. Reads slide content, evaluates narrative flow, problem/solution clarity, market sizing, competitive positioning, financial projections, team credibility, and ask clarity. Generates a scored pitch-review.md with slide-by-slide feedback, overall score, top improvements, investor objection predictions, and comparisons to successful decks. Use when reviewing fundraising materials, investor decks, or pitch presentations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verification guide for citations added during rebuttal writing. Use when Stage 2 responses introduce new references, when the Area Chair asks about a cited paper, or when any citation in the rebuttal might have been AI-generated. Prevents the serious credibility damage of fabricated references in reviewer-facing documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Computational Scientist. Use when a task calls for Computational Scientist judgment. Reasons from Roache code/solution verification and ASME V&V 10/20/40 credibility through MMS/GCI, UQ ensembles, and Snakemake/Nextflow/CWL pipelines with conda-lock/Apptainer provenance while treating environment drift, workflow cache staleness, and validation-vs-calibration conflation as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Actuarial Scientist. Use when a task calls for Actuarial Scientist judgment. Reasons from mortality tables (qx, period/cohort, select/ultimate) and Chain-Ladder/Mack reserving through GLM/GAM frequency–severity and Tweedie pricing, limited-fluctuation and Bühlhmann-Straub credibility, Solvency II SCR standard formula, and IFRS 17 CSM/RA while treating triangle truncation, overfitting, and tail risk as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Semi-automated fact-checking, source credibility evaluation, misinformation detection, prebunking, and evidence-ledger based claim verification. Use when a user asks to verify a claim, article, social post, screenshot, URL, quote, data point, compare sources, detect manipulation, evaluate source reliability, or generate an HTML fact-check card/share-safe correction. Supports text, URLs, screenshots/images, two-source comparison, and topic-level prebunking in Bulgarian, English, Russian, EU policy, health, science, and geopolitical contexts. Trigger phrases: "is this true?", "is this fake?", "fact check this", "compare these sources", "проверка на факти", "истина ли е", "дезинформация ли е", "сравни тези източници".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Semi-automated fact-checking, source credibility evaluation, misinformation detection, prebunking, and evidence-ledger based claim verification. Use when a user asks to verify a claim, article, social post, screenshot, URL, quote, data point, compare sources, detect manipulation, evaluate source reliability, or generate an HTML fact-check card/share-safe correction. Supports text, URLs, screenshots/images, two-source comparison, and topic-level prebunking in Bulgarian, English, Russian, EU policy, health, science, and geopolitical contexts. Trigger phrases: "is this true?", "is this fake?", "fact check this", "compare these sources", "проверка на факти", "истина ли е", "дезинформация ли е", "сравни тези източници".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluating online information for credibility, accuracy, and context. Covers the SIFT method (Stop, Investigate, Find, Trace), lateral reading, reverse image search, primary source verification, and common misinformation tactics. Use when assessing the trustworthiness of a web page, article, video, social media post, or any digital claim before relying on it or sharing it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluating the quality, provenance, and relevance of evidence that supports or undermines a claim. Covers source credibility, sampling quality, study design, levels of evidence (anecdote to meta-analysis), base rate integration, distinguishing primary from secondary sources, and calibrating belief to evidence strength. Use when the question is not whether an argument is valid but whether its premises are actually supported by the available data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

用户写完推文初稿、准备发布前做完备性自检时;或纠结"这条推文发出去会有人收藏吗 / 值得收藏吗"时;或感觉初稿"差点什么"但说不清缺什么时。关键 trigger: 检查推文还缺什么 / 五件套 / 完备性检查 / 收藏理由 / 证据够不够 / 三个可 / checklist / is this tweet complete / worth saving。不适用于:还没写初稿时(先用起草工具);评估值不值得发(那是四省模型)。本 skill 把推文当小型信息产品逐件自检五要素:价值承诺 / 使用场景 / 低门槛入口 / 证据(三个可:可见可点可算)/ 收藏理由,缺任一件读者在该环节流失。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write articles, guides, blog posts, tutorials, newsletter issues, and other long-form content in a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance. Use when the user wants polished written content longer than a paragraph, especially when voice consistency, structure, and credibility matter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户需要让广告文案中的产品承诺更有说服力、更有"证据感"时调用。 适用于：写出产品好处但客户不信、需要在文案中加入"证明"元素、 做竞品对比文案。核心信号：用户在问"怎么让客户相信""怎么证明我的产品好"。 不适用于：纯品牌形象传播（不需要证明）、虚假宣传（造假不是伪逻辑）。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when rating a source with the NATO Admiralty Scale, the user asks "is this reliable?" / "rate this source", or the tradecraft pipeline calls for source assessment before publishing. Reliability A-F, credibility 1-6.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need Liberty91 platform intelligence — what actually happened (deduplicated Threat Events with every source, Admiralty reliability/credibility and verification stage), whether an IOC is already known to your account, the canonical threat library (actors, malware, vulnerabilities, clusters, ATT&CK TTPs), alert matches, or which of your customer organizations an occurrence affects — or when you need to push intelligence back: ingesting your own report, generating an intelligence package, or uploading an organization document. Also supplies event provenance fields, when the platform returns them, and Threat Library alias resolution to /source-provenance and /quality-of-information-check. Two-way, first-party integration. Commonly invoked by /ip-investigation and friends, /ioc-enrichment-workflow, /threat-actor-profiling, /campaign-tracking and /vulnerability-intelligence. Reads $LIBERTY91_API_KEY.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Founder Brand And Thought Leadership Specialist. Use to define founder IP territory, create content systems for X and LinkedIn, and turn founder experience into audience, distribution, and credibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a central bank governor — setting a policy rate decision against a dual mandate, deciding whether a distressed financial institution needs liquidity support or resolution, calibrating forward guidance language against credibility risk, weighing quantitative easing or tightening at the effective lower bound, or drafting the public communication that accompanies a policy decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Administrative Law Judge, Adjudicator, or Hearing Officer — applying a mandatory sequential/structured evaluation framework in required order, weighing conflicting medical or vocational opinion evidence using specific regulatory factors, writing findings that explicitly address significant contrary evidence in the record, drafting a credibility/consistency finding tied to specific record citations, or checking whether a draft decision would survive substantial-evidence review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Actuary — estimating unpaid claim reserves with chain-ladder or Bornhuetter-Ferguson methods, building or reviewing a rate indication from loss experience, applying credibility weighting to thin or volatile data, drafting a statement of actuarial opinion, or diagnosing whether a reserve or pricing assumption has stopped matching reality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write articles, guides, blog posts, tutorials, newsletter issues, and other long-form content in a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance. Use when the user wants polished written content longer than a paragraph, especially when voice consistency, structure, and credibility matter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。