71 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Design a source evaluation protocol using lateral reading and credibility checks for digital information. Use when students need to evaluate websites, online sources, or social media claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a source evaluation protocol using lateral reading and credibility checks for digital information. Use when students need to evaluate websites, online sources, or social media claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Why expensive, wasteful, effortful, or self-deprecating actions build trust and desire — Rory Sutherland on signalling. Use when the problem is credibility or desirability rather than meaning: the user asks 'why don't people trust us', 'how do we look more credible/committed/premium', 'is our guarantee/warranty worth it', 'should we spend on brand advertising', 'how do we justify a higher price', or wonders why a cheaper-looking competitor wins. Covers costly signals (advertising spend, guarantees, over-delivery), price-as-quality-signal (Veblen goods), and the Pratfall Effect (admitting a real flaw to gain trust). Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic. 日本語の相談（「信頼されない」「安心してもらえない」「強気な価格で売りたい」「広告費に意味はある？」）にも使う。中文咨询（“不被信任”“想以高价出售”“广告费有意义吗？”）也适用。
メモや調査資料をもとに、ブログ記事、ガイド、ニュースレターなどの長文を作成し、既存の文体やブランドの方針に合わせて構成と根拠を整えるスキル。
記事やガイド、ニュースレターを、提供された文例やブランドの文体に合わせて執筆します。メモや調査資料の文章化から、既存原稿の構成・根拠の見直しまで扱います。
競合のブランド表現やサービス、実績などを共通の基準で採点し、根拠付きの比較カードと戦略上の二軸図にまとめ、自社が狙う位置の競合を把握するスキル。
Three-layer bias analysis on any URL, file, or text — auto-fetches the content and any cited study, then audits data-level biases, source conflicts of interest, and journalism-added distortions, separating what the data supports from what's editorialized. USE WHEN bias analysis, analyze bias, bias check, check this study, who funded this, is this source biased, fact-check article, methodological flaws, source credibility, what's wrong with this claim. NOT FOR psychological author analysis, research synthesis (use Research), entity due diligence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when preparing full pre-earnings preview reports with executive summary, expectation bar, guidance credibility, KPI dashboard, scenarios, and call questions. Do not use after results or for short summaries unless the user explicitly asks for a summary/short version.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research a person's public track record and give a short credibility assessment. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /who-is-this.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing domain authority, trust, or citation credibility; runs a peer-relative 40-item CITE profile with evidence coverage and verified manipulation/penalty veto checks. Not for page-level content quality — use content-quality-auditor; not for backlink profiling alone — use offsite-signal-analyzer. 域名权威/网站可信度
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Acknowledges limitations in sample, design, measurement, and validation in a professional way that improves credibility without undermining the whole paper. Use when writing the limitations paragraph of a Discussion section, preparing a grant risk assessment, responding to reviewers about study weaknesses, or framing scope boundaries for a paper. Also triggers on "write my limitations", "how should I address the limitation of", "reviewer said my sample is too small", or "help me word this limitation".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Save URLs with auto-extracted insights, credibility scoring, and vault routing
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes content for E-E-A-T signals and suggests improvements to build authority and trust. Identifies missing credibility elements. Use PROACTIVELY for YMYL topics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dialogue writing and revision for screen and stage (对白/台词/潜台词) — merged from Robert McKee's Dialogue (dialogue as action, said/unsaid/unsayable, exposition as ammunition, beat = action/reaction gerunds, flaws of credibility/language/content/design, character-specific vocabulary and grammar, seven scene analyses), Richard Walter (economy, subtext, argument, no small talk, no parentheticals, silence), Neill Hicks (listening, on-the-nose exceptions, energy, five-step exercise), Lu Jun (语言要美; 典雅美/通俗美, 对话三要求 动作性/性格化/潜台词), Lajos Egri (dialogue born of three-dimensional character, escalation), Blake Snyder (cover-the-names test), and screwball-comedy dialogue conventions. Use when writing or polishing dialogue, fixing on-the-nose or expository lines, giving each character a distinct voice, converting a two-hander into a trialogue, writing comedy exchanges, or cutting speeches. Chinese-opera lyrics (戏曲唱词) are in sw-chinese-opera-banqiang, not here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Independently assess an RPI plan without editing it. Use when an implementation-ready plan needs a credibility check or a revised plan needs its earlier findings reconciled.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help users design and execute a press strategy that moves beyond vanity metrics to achieve specific business goals like funding, user acquisition, or B2B credibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write articles, guides, blog posts, tutorials, newsletter issues, and other long-form content in a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance. Use when the user wants polished written content longer than a paragraph, especially when voice consistency, structure, and credibility matter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the question is what makes the result tight or what the data identify for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript — covering both (a) structural/empirical-IO and experimental identification and (b) for pure theory, which assumptions drive the result and how robust the mechanism is. Stress-tests credibility; it does not build the model (see aejmic-theory-model).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the causal identification argument is the bottleneck for an American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) manuscript — RCT, difference-in-differences/event study, regression discontinuity, IV, or shift-share. Stress-tests the data-to-causal-estimate mapping to the AEJ: Applied credibility bar before exhibits are finalized; it does not write the prose or build the package.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the credibility of the causal evaluation of a policy is the bottleneck for an AEJ: Economic Policy manuscript — DID/event study, IV, RDD/bunching, or RCT of a program. Stress-tests the quasi-experimental policy-evaluation design to the AEJ: Policy bar before exhibits are finalized; it does not build the welfare mapping or write exhibits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when appraising the cumulative evidence and ensuring balance in an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — weighing conflicting findings by credibility, steelmanning rival schools, and handling the author's own work even-handedly. Audits evidence quality and fairness; it does not design the framework (amann-organizing-framework) or build exhibits (amann-tables-figures).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Render a punchy ~12s vertical (9:16) music-only direct-response OFFER ad as a 4-beat kinetic-typography film — HEADLINE slam → real PRODUCT drop → CLAIM/proof → CTA pill — from one config of copy slots, a real product photo, a brand palette, fonts, bpm, and beat split. DETERMINISTIC + FREE (a bundled Remotion project; springs + interpolate, no AI-gen for visuals). Backgrounds are engine gradient divs off the palette, props are inline SVG, the ONLY composited bitmap is the REAL product photo (objectFit:contain, never stretched), and ALL headline/claim/CTA/URL/wordmark text is typeset in the engine — never AI-rendered (the format's credibility guard). A driver binds the config to Remotion input props, renders the 9:16 master, and derives a 1:1 center-crop with ffmpeg. Two gating checks run before render (claim verbs must match the product's physical format; the claim beat needs an edge-entry mechanism prop). Use for the motion-graphics-offer-ad format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs subgroup and heterogeneous treatment effect (HTE) analyses for clinical trials. Covers Mantel-Haenszel pooling, Breslow-Day, interaction tests in regression, RERI for additive interaction, modern data-adaptive HTE methods (STEPP, SIDES, causal forests, X/R-learners), Bayesian shrinkage (Dixon-Simon, MAP, EXNEX), graphical multiplicity (Bretz-Maurer), and credibility frameworks (Sun BMJ, EMA 2019). Use when analyzing treatment effects across patient subgroups for regulatory submissions or precision-medicine claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to improve E-E-A-T, add trust signals, or optimize for expertise and authority. Also use when the user mentions "E-E-A-T," "E-E-A-T signals," "experience expertise authority trust," "author bio," "YMYL," "trust signals," "expertise signals," "authority signals," "citations," "references," or "credibility." For headings, use heading-structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。